NCT06556498

Brief Summary

there are currently two methods for fixation free laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair specifically based on the intrinsic properties of the device used. The Progrip mesh technique leaves the hernia orifice patent and relies on the established principle of strengthening the groin through scar tissue incorporation induced by foreign body reaction. In contrast, the ProFlor concept introduces a 3D dynamic regenerative scaffold that permanently obliterates the defect and regenerates the herniated inguinal barrier. This report presents the outcomes of laparoscopic techniques employing Progrip and ProFlor in randomized clinical trial. The results of this clinical study may have the potential to pave the way for innovative advancements in hernia repair techniques.

Trial Health

55
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
150

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for phase_4

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2021

Longer than P75 for phase_4

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
enrolling by invitation

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2021

Completed
3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 31, 2023

Completed
6 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 29, 2024

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 16, 2024

Completed
1.4 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 31, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

August 16, 2024

Status Verified

August 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

3 years

First QC Date

June 29, 2024

Last Update Submit

August 13, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

hernia surgeryinguinal herniafixation free repairTAPPlaparoscopic surgery

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • postoperative adverse events

    postoperative adverse events. The primary objective of these evaluations was to detect any possible complications that may have arisen, including but not limited to recurrence, hematoma, seroma, testicular swelling, wound infection/abscesses, prosthesis displacement, or any other complication. We used clinical observation and radiological findings to detect these complications.

    30-postoperative days

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Visual analogue score (VAS)

    1 - 6- 12 and 24 months

  • Carolinas Comfort Scale (CCS)

    1 - 6- 12 and 24 months

Study Arms (2)

ProFlor group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

patients underwent to laparoscopic hernia repair with the use of ProFlor mesh

Procedure: Proflor group

Progrip group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

patients underwent to laparoscopic hernia repair with the use of Progrip mesh

Procedure: Progrip group

Interventions

Proflor groupPROCEDURE

evaluate the surgical outcomes of patients underwent to laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair with Proflor mesh.

ProFlor group
Progrip groupPROCEDURE

evaluate the surgical outcomes of patients underwent to laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair with Progrip mesh.

Progrip group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 85 Years
Sexmale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • bilateral inguinal hernia

You may not qualify if:

  • Recurrent inguinal hernia
  • Incarcerated inguinal hernia
  • Hernia not in the inguinal area
  • Signs of obvious local or systemic infection
  • ASA score \> 4
  • Presenting with unstable angina or NYHA class of IV
  • Pregnant
  • Active drug user
  • Immunosuppression, chemotherapy
  • Chronic renal insufficiency
  • Abdominal ascites
  • Infection in area of the surgical field
  • BMI \>34

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Italy

Palermo, 90127, Italy

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Di Buono G, Romano G, Rodolico V, Amato G, Zanghi G, Romano G, Calo PG, Agrusa A. Progrip versus ProFlor: two fixation-free devices for laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair-the Pro/Pro study, a randomized clinical trial. Surg Endosc. 2025 May;39(5):3113-3126. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11680-x. Epub 2025 Apr 1.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Hernia, Inguinal

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Hernia, AbdominalHerniaPathological Conditions, AnatomicalPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Giuseppe Di Buono

    University of Palermo

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Antoninoq Agrusa

    University of Palermo

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Masking Details
Compared progrip mesh with proflor mesh
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: we use progrip mesh and proflor mesh in different arms of patients
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Full Professor of Surgery

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 29, 2024

First Posted

August 16, 2024

Study Start

January 1, 2021

Primary Completion

December 31, 2023

Study Completion

December 31, 2025

Last Updated

August 16, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-08

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations