Progrip Versus ProFlor: Two Fixation Free Devices for Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair
ProPro
1 other identifier
interventional
150
1 country
1
Brief Summary
there are currently two methods for fixation free laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair specifically based on the intrinsic properties of the device used. The Progrip mesh technique leaves the hernia orifice patent and relies on the established principle of strengthening the groin through scar tissue incorporation induced by foreign body reaction. In contrast, the ProFlor concept introduces a 3D dynamic regenerative scaffold that permanently obliterates the defect and regenerates the herniated inguinal barrier. This report presents the outcomes of laparoscopic techniques employing Progrip and ProFlor in randomized clinical trial. The results of this clinical study may have the potential to pave the way for innovative advancements in hernia repair techniques.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4
Started Jan 2021
Longer than P75 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2023
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 29, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 16, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2025
CompletedAugust 16, 2024
August 1, 2024
3 years
June 29, 2024
August 13, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
postoperative adverse events
postoperative adverse events. The primary objective of these evaluations was to detect any possible complications that may have arisen, including but not limited to recurrence, hematoma, seroma, testicular swelling, wound infection/abscesses, prosthesis displacement, or any other complication. We used clinical observation and radiological findings to detect these complications.
30-postoperative days
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Visual analogue score (VAS)
1 - 6- 12 and 24 months
Carolinas Comfort Scale (CCS)
1 - 6- 12 and 24 months
Study Arms (2)
ProFlor group
ACTIVE COMPARATORpatients underwent to laparoscopic hernia repair with the use of ProFlor mesh
Progrip group
ACTIVE COMPARATORpatients underwent to laparoscopic hernia repair with the use of Progrip mesh
Interventions
evaluate the surgical outcomes of patients underwent to laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair with Proflor mesh.
evaluate the surgical outcomes of patients underwent to laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair with Progrip mesh.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- bilateral inguinal hernia
You may not qualify if:
- Recurrent inguinal hernia
- Incarcerated inguinal hernia
- Hernia not in the inguinal area
- Signs of obvious local or systemic infection
- ASA score \> 4
- Presenting with unstable angina or NYHA class of IV
- Pregnant
- Active drug user
- Immunosuppression, chemotherapy
- Chronic renal insufficiency
- Abdominal ascites
- Infection in area of the surgical field
- BMI \>34
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Italy
Palermo, 90127, Italy
Related Publications (1)
Di Buono G, Romano G, Rodolico V, Amato G, Zanghi G, Romano G, Calo PG, Agrusa A. Progrip versus ProFlor: two fixation-free devices for laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair-the Pro/Pro study, a randomized clinical trial. Surg Endosc. 2025 May;39(5):3113-3126. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11680-x. Epub 2025 Apr 1.
PMID: 40167608DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Giuseppe Di Buono
University of Palermo
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Antoninoq Agrusa
University of Palermo
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Masking Details
- Compared progrip mesh with proflor mesh
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Full Professor of Surgery
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 29, 2024
First Posted
August 16, 2024
Study Start
January 1, 2021
Primary Completion
December 31, 2023
Study Completion
December 31, 2025
Last Updated
August 16, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share