Strattice in Repair of Inguinal Hernias
RING
Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Third-Party Blinded Multicenter Evaluation of Strattice/LTM in the Repair of Inguinal Hernias
1 other identifier
interventional
172
1 country
8
Brief Summary
This is a prospective, randomized, controlled, third-party blinded, multicenter, interventional evaluation of inguinal hernia repair comparing Strattice to light weight polypropylene mesh. Performance and outcomes measures to be compared include postoperative resumption of activities of daily living, nature and incidence of short- and long-term pain and complications, and incidence of hernia recurrence.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4
Started Apr 2008
Longer than P75 for phase_4
8 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2008
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 15, 2008
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 21, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2012
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
March 23, 2016
CompletedMay 10, 2016
April 1, 2016
4.2 years
May 15, 2008
September 18, 2013
April 6, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Change From Baseline in Activities Assessment Scale at 3 Months
The AAS includes 13 items covering a broad sample of sedentary, movement-related and graded-intensity physical activities. Respondents are asked to rate the degree of difficulty performing each of these activities in the previous 24 hours on a 5-point scale from "No difficulty = 1" to "Not able to do it = 5." The AAS has three subscales: sedentary activities (items 1-4); ambulatory activities (items 6-8); work/exercise activities (items 11-13). The AAS total and subscale scores are transformed to produce a range of 0-100, with higher values indicating greater functional activity. Subjects completed the assessment at baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months. It is the change from baseline to 3, 6, 12 and 24 months which is the primary outcome measure (Baseline calculated value minus time point calculated value). Therefore, a negative number indicates an increase in activity from baseline.
Baseline to 3 Months
Change From Baseline in Activities Assessment Scale at 6 Months
The AAS includes 13 items covering a broad sample of sedentary, movement-related and graded-intensity physical activities. Respondents are asked to rate the degree of difficulty performing each of these activities in the previous 24 hours on a 5-point scale from "No difficulty" to "Not able to do it." The AAS has three subscales: sedentary activities (items 1-4); ambulatory activities (items 6-8); work/exercise activities (items 11-13). The AAS total and subscale scores are transformed to produce a range of 0-100, with higher values indicating greater functional activity. Subjects completed the assessment at baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months. It is the change from baseline to 3, 6, 12 and 24 months which is the primary outcome measure (Baseline calculated value minus time point calculated value). Therefore, a negative number indicates an increase in activity from baseline.
Baseline to 6 Months
Change From Baseline in Activities Assessment Scale at 12 Months
The AAS includes 13 items covering a broad sample of sedentary, movement-related and graded-intensity physical activities. Respondents are asked to rate the degree of difficulty performing each of these activities in the previous 24 hours on a 5-point scale from "No difficulty" to "Not able to do it." The AAS has three subscales: sedentary activities (items 1-4); ambulatory activities (items 6-8); work/exercise activities (items 11-13). The AAS total and subscale scores are transformed to produce a range of 0-100, with higher values indicating greater functional activity. Subjects completed the assessment at baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months. It is the change from baseline to 3, 6, 12 and 24 months which is the primary outcome measure (Baseline calculated value minus time point calculated value). Therefore, a negative number indicates an increase in activity from baseline.
Baseline to 12 Months
Change From Baseline in Activities Assessment Scale at 24 Months
The AAS includes 13 items covering a broad sample of sedentary, movement-related and graded-intensity physical activities. Respondents are asked to rate the degree of difficulty performing each of these activities in the previous 24 hours on a 5-point scale from "No difficulty" to "Not able to do it." The AAS has three subscales: sedentary activities (items 1-4); ambulatory activities (items 6-8); work/exercise activities (items 11-13). The AAS total and subscale scores are transformed to produce a range of 0-100, with higher values indicating greater functional activity. Subjects completed the assessment at baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months. It is the change from baseline to 3, 6, 12 and 24 months which is the primary outcome measure (Baseline calculated value minus time point calculated value). Therefore, a negative number indicates an increase in activity from baseline.
Baseline to 24 Months
Study Arms (2)
1
ACTIVE COMPARATORlightweight polypropylene mesh
2
ACTIVE COMPARATORStrattice
Interventions
surgical mesh (15x15cm) to support Lichtenstein repair
Surgical mesh (10x16) used to support Lichtenstein repair
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- adult male
- symptomatic and palpable inguinal hernia
- open, elective, primary unilateral inguinal hernia repair
You may not qualify if:
- bilateral inguinal hernia repair
- BMI \>35
- chronic immunosuppression, active chemo/radiation therapy, uncontrolled diabetes, severe liver disease or COPD
- chronic prostatitis, orchitis, testicular pain
- local or systemic infection at time of repair
- known collagen disorder
- chronic pain syndrome or under active pain management
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- LifeCelllead
Study Sites (8)
Hospital of St Raphael
New Haven, Connecticut, 06511, United States
Tulane University Health Sciences Center
New Orleans, Louisiana, 70112, United States
University of Maryland School of Medicine
Baltimore, Maryland, 21201, United States
Creighton University
Omaha, Nebraska, 68178, United States
Regional Surgical Associates
Durham, North Carolina, 27704, United States
Oregon Health Sciences University
Portland, Oregon, 97239, United States
Baylor College of Medicine
Houston, Texas, 77030, United States
Sentara Norfolk General Hospital
Norfolk, Virginia, 23507, United States
Related Publications (1)
Bellows CF, Shadduck PP, Helton WS, Fitzgibbons RJ. The design of an industry-sponsored randomized controlled trial to compare synthetic mesh versus biologic mesh for inguinal hernia repair. Hernia. 2011 Jun;15(3):325-32. doi: 10.1007/s10029-010-0773-x. Epub 2011 Jan 8.
PMID: 21222008DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Donna Jacobs
- Organization
- LifeCell
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Charles Bellows, MD, FACS
Tulane University
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Samir Awad, MD, FACS
Baylor College of Medicine
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Robert Fitzgibbons, MD, FACS
Creighton University
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 15, 2008
First Posted
May 21, 2008
Study Start
April 1, 2008
Primary Completion
June 1, 2012
Study Completion
June 1, 2012
Last Updated
May 10, 2016
Results First Posted
March 23, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-04