NCT00681291

Brief Summary

This is a prospective, randomized, controlled, third-party blinded, multicenter, interventional evaluation of inguinal hernia repair comparing Strattice to light weight polypropylene mesh. Performance and outcomes measures to be compared include postoperative resumption of activities of daily living, nature and incidence of short- and long-term pain and complications, and incidence of hernia recurrence.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
172

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for phase_4

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2008

Longer than P75 for phase_4

Geographic Reach
1 country

8 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 1, 2008

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 15, 2008

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 21, 2008

Completed
4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 1, 2012

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 1, 2012

Completed
3.8 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

March 23, 2016

Completed
Last Updated

May 10, 2016

Status Verified

April 1, 2016

Enrollment Period

4.2 years

First QC Date

May 15, 2008

Results QC Date

September 18, 2013

Last Update Submit

April 6, 2016

Conditions

Keywords

surgical meshinguinal hernia repairchronic groin pain

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

  • Change From Baseline in Activities Assessment Scale at 3 Months

    The AAS includes 13 items covering a broad sample of sedentary, movement-related and graded-intensity physical activities. Respondents are asked to rate the degree of difficulty performing each of these activities in the previous 24 hours on a 5-point scale from "No difficulty = 1" to "Not able to do it = 5." The AAS has three subscales: sedentary activities (items 1-4); ambulatory activities (items 6-8); work/exercise activities (items 11-13). The AAS total and subscale scores are transformed to produce a range of 0-100, with higher values indicating greater functional activity. Subjects completed the assessment at baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months. It is the change from baseline to 3, 6, 12 and 24 months which is the primary outcome measure (Baseline calculated value minus time point calculated value). Therefore, a negative number indicates an increase in activity from baseline.

    Baseline to 3 Months

  • Change From Baseline in Activities Assessment Scale at 6 Months

    The AAS includes 13 items covering a broad sample of sedentary, movement-related and graded-intensity physical activities. Respondents are asked to rate the degree of difficulty performing each of these activities in the previous 24 hours on a 5-point scale from "No difficulty" to "Not able to do it." The AAS has three subscales: sedentary activities (items 1-4); ambulatory activities (items 6-8); work/exercise activities (items 11-13). The AAS total and subscale scores are transformed to produce a range of 0-100, with higher values indicating greater functional activity. Subjects completed the assessment at baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months. It is the change from baseline to 3, 6, 12 and 24 months which is the primary outcome measure (Baseline calculated value minus time point calculated value). Therefore, a negative number indicates an increase in activity from baseline.

    Baseline to 6 Months

  • Change From Baseline in Activities Assessment Scale at 12 Months

    The AAS includes 13 items covering a broad sample of sedentary, movement-related and graded-intensity physical activities. Respondents are asked to rate the degree of difficulty performing each of these activities in the previous 24 hours on a 5-point scale from "No difficulty" to "Not able to do it." The AAS has three subscales: sedentary activities (items 1-4); ambulatory activities (items 6-8); work/exercise activities (items 11-13). The AAS total and subscale scores are transformed to produce a range of 0-100, with higher values indicating greater functional activity. Subjects completed the assessment at baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months. It is the change from baseline to 3, 6, 12 and 24 months which is the primary outcome measure (Baseline calculated value minus time point calculated value). Therefore, a negative number indicates an increase in activity from baseline.

    Baseline to 12 Months

  • Change From Baseline in Activities Assessment Scale at 24 Months

    The AAS includes 13 items covering a broad sample of sedentary, movement-related and graded-intensity physical activities. Respondents are asked to rate the degree of difficulty performing each of these activities in the previous 24 hours on a 5-point scale from "No difficulty" to "Not able to do it." The AAS has three subscales: sedentary activities (items 1-4); ambulatory activities (items 6-8); work/exercise activities (items 11-13). The AAS total and subscale scores are transformed to produce a range of 0-100, with higher values indicating greater functional activity. Subjects completed the assessment at baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months. It is the change from baseline to 3, 6, 12 and 24 months which is the primary outcome measure (Baseline calculated value minus time point calculated value). Therefore, a negative number indicates an increase in activity from baseline.

    Baseline to 24 Months

Study Arms (2)

1

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

lightweight polypropylene mesh

Device: Inguinal hernia repair with Ultrapro

2

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Strattice

Device: Inguinal hernia repair with Strattice

Interventions

surgical mesh (15x15cm) to support Lichtenstein repair

Also known as: Ultrapro (Ethicon, Somerville NJ)
1

Surgical mesh (10x16) used to support Lichtenstein repair

Also known as: Strattice Reconstructive Tissue Matrix
2

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexmale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • adult male
  • symptomatic and palpable inguinal hernia
  • open, elective, primary unilateral inguinal hernia repair

You may not qualify if:

  • bilateral inguinal hernia repair
  • BMI \>35
  • chronic immunosuppression, active chemo/radiation therapy, uncontrolled diabetes, severe liver disease or COPD
  • chronic prostatitis, orchitis, testicular pain
  • local or systemic infection at time of repair
  • known collagen disorder
  • chronic pain syndrome or under active pain management

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (8)

Hospital of St Raphael

New Haven, Connecticut, 06511, United States

Location

Tulane University Health Sciences Center

New Orleans, Louisiana, 70112, United States

Location

University of Maryland School of Medicine

Baltimore, Maryland, 21201, United States

Location

Creighton University

Omaha, Nebraska, 68178, United States

Location

Regional Surgical Associates

Durham, North Carolina, 27704, United States

Location

Oregon Health Sciences University

Portland, Oregon, 97239, United States

Location

Baylor College of Medicine

Houston, Texas, 77030, United States

Location

Sentara Norfolk General Hospital

Norfolk, Virginia, 23507, United States

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Bellows CF, Shadduck PP, Helton WS, Fitzgibbons RJ. The design of an industry-sponsored randomized controlled trial to compare synthetic mesh versus biologic mesh for inguinal hernia repair. Hernia. 2011 Jun;15(3):325-32. doi: 10.1007/s10029-010-0773-x. Epub 2011 Jan 8.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Hernia, Inguinal

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Hernia, AbdominalHerniaPathological Conditions, AnatomicalPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Results Point of Contact

Title
Donna Jacobs
Organization
LifeCell

Study Officials

  • Charles Bellows, MD, FACS

    Tulane University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Samir Awad, MD, FACS

    Baylor College of Medicine

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Robert Fitzgibbons, MD, FACS

    Creighton University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
OTHER
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 15, 2008

First Posted

May 21, 2008

Study Start

April 1, 2008

Primary Completion

June 1, 2012

Study Completion

June 1, 2012

Last Updated

May 10, 2016

Results First Posted

March 23, 2016

Record last verified: 2016-04

Locations