Parietex Progrip Study
ProGrip Mesh Repair Versus Lichtenstein Mesh Repair: a Comparative Randomized Study in Primary Inguinal Hernia
1 other identifier
interventional
603
5 countries
9
Brief Summary
The objective of the study is to evaluate pain and disabling complications inducing social consequences in primary inguinal hernia ProGrip mesh repair compared to Lichtenstein repair with lightweight polypropylene mesh.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_4
Started Oct 2008
Longer than P75 for phase_4
9 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2008
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 22, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 23, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2012
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
November 17, 2016
CompletedNovember 17, 2016
November 1, 2016
4 years
January 22, 2009
August 23, 2013
November 16, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Pain Assessment During the First Three Months and at One Year After Surgery Using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Pain assessment during patient follow up after surgery using VAS score. VAS going from 0 mm (no pain) to 150 mm (worst conceivable pain) is presented to the patient who draw a vertical line on the scale to indicate the average amount of pain at the time of consultation or at home.
M3, M12 after surgery
Pain Assessment During the First Three Months and at One Year After Surgery Using a Surgical Pain Scales (SPS)
Surgical pain scales (=SPS) completed by patient during consultation or will be sent to the patient with instructions to complete it and send it back by mailing. The score of evaluation will be reported in mm, specifying if pain occurs at rest, during normal activities, during exercise. The score is ranged from 0 (no pain) to 150 mm (the worst pain yu have never known).
M3, M12 after surgery
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Foreign Body Sensation
M1, M3, M12 months after surgery
Chronic Pain Defined as Pain Lasting More Than 3 Months Using VAS Score
3 months after surgery
Wound Complications and Hernia Recurrences
M12 after surgery
Return to Work and to Normal Daily Activities
Effective date
Other Post-operative Complications
M12 after surgery
Study Arms (2)
1
ACTIVE COMPARATORParietex ProGrip
2
ACTIVE COMPARATORLow weight polypropylene mesh
Interventions
Surgical technique: Self-gripping lightweight Polyester and Polylactic acid meshes providing a sutureless fixation.
Surgical technique: Lichtenstein repair with lightweight polypropylene mesh (inferior to 70gr/m2) secured to the posterior inguinal wall with sutures
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- All male patients at participating centers with a primary, uncomplicated inguinal hernia.
- Collar of the defect ≤ 4 cm
- Signed informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- years ≥ Age ≥ 75 years
- Emergency procedure
- Bilateral inguinal hernia
- Recurrence
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Medtronic - MITGlead
Study Sites (9)
Universitaire Ziekenhuizen Leuven
Leuven, 3000, Belgium
Klinikum Bremen-Mitte
Bremen, 28177, Germany
Herz-Jesu-Krankenhaus gGmbH, Chirurgische Klinik
Fulda, D- 36039 Fulda, Germany
Catharina-ziekenhuis
Eindhoven, 5623 EJ, Netherlands
Medical Center Linköping
Linköping, 582 24, Sweden
Centre of clinical research
Västeras-, 721 89, Sweden
Western Infirmary
Glasgow, G11 6NT, United Kingdom
Imperial College London / Faculty of Medecine
London, W2 1NY, United Kingdom
Derriford Hospital
Plymouth, PL6, United Kingdom
Related Publications (1)
Sanders DL, Nienhuijs S, Ziprin P, Miserez M, Gingell-Littlejohn M, Smeds S. Randomized clinical trial comparing self-gripping mesh with suture fixation of lightweight polypropylene mesh in open inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg. 2014 Oct;101(11):1373-82; discussion 1382. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9598. Epub 2014 Aug 21.
PMID: 25146918DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Pr. Andrew KINGSNORTH
- Organization
- Derriford Hospital, Department of Surgery
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- LTE60
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 22, 2009
First Posted
January 23, 2009
Study Start
October 1, 2008
Primary Completion
October 1, 2012
Study Completion
October 1, 2012
Last Updated
November 17, 2016
Results First Posted
November 17, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-11