Optimal Intensity of Reactive Balance Training Post-stroke
1 other identifier
interventional
63
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Falls in daily life are a serious risk for people with stroke. A new type of balance training, called reactive balance training (RBT). may help to reduce this risk of falling. In some previous studies participants improved their balance reactions a lot after RBT, whereas others did not improve at all. These studies used different types and amounts of training. Differences in training program features might explain differences in the study results. Training intensity is the difficulty or challenge of the training program. For other types of exercise (like 'cardio' or strength training) if the intensity of exercise is increased, someone can get the same benefits in less time than with lower intensity exercise. Physiotherapists report that they have limited time in rehabilitation to do everything they need to do with their stroke patients, so it would be valuable to know if high-intensity RBT improves balance reactions quickly. The goal of this study is to see if more intense RBT improves balance reactions faster than less intense RBT. People with chronic stroke will be randomly placed in one of three groups: high-intensity RBT, moderate-intensity RBT, or a walking control group. The investigators will find the fastest moving platform speed that participants can respond to with single step (multi-step threshold). There will then be 4 1-hour long training sessions in one week. Participants in the high-intensity group will experience platform movements that are 50% faster than the multi-step threshold. Participants in the moderate-intensity group will experience platform movements at the multi-step threshold. Participants in both RBT groups will experience 36 multi-directional platform movements in each training session, causing them to start to fall forwards, to the left, or to the right. Participants in the walking group will walk on the platform 36 times without any platform movements. The investigators will measure how quickly people improve their balance reactions over the training program.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2024
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 6, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 15, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 11, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2027
January 27, 2025
August 1, 2024
1.6 years
August 6, 2024
January 22, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Number of steps
Learning rate for number of steps to recover from 'backward fall' balance perturbations
One week
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Step initiation time
One week post-training
Step execution time
One week post-training
Step length
One week post-training
Braking impulse
One week post-training
Mechanical margin of stability
One week post-training
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (5)
Fall incidence
12 months post-training
Injurious fall incidence
12 months post-training
5-level EuroQoL health status measure (EQ-5D-5L)
One week and 12-months post-training
- +2 more other outcomes
Study Arms (3)
High intensity reactive balance training
EXPERIMENTALTraining sessions will be overseen by a physiotherapist and will last for 1 hour over 4 consecutive days.Participants assigned to the RBT groups will experience 36 multi-directional (left-, right-, and forward-fall) perturbations in each training session, presented in an unpredictable sequence. Balance perturbations will be provided using a custom moving platform. Participants assigned to high-intensity RBT will experience perturbations at 150% of the multi-step threshold; for example, for a multi-step threshold of 2 m/s\^2 the high intensity will be 3 m/s\^2.
Moderate intensity reactive balance training
ACTIVE COMPARATORTraining sessions will be overseen by a physiotherapist and will last for 1 hour over 4 consecutive days.Participants assigned to the RBT groups will experience 36 multi-directional (left-, right-, and forward-fall) perturbations in each training session, presented in an unpredictable sequence. Balance perturbations will be provided using a custom moving platform. Participants assigned to the moderate-intensity RBT group will experience perturbations at the multi-step threshold.
Walking control group
SHAM COMPARATORTraining sessions will be overseen by a physiotherapist and will last for 1 hour over 4 consecutive days. Participants in the walking control group will complete 36 unperturbed walking trials on the moving platform in each training session.
Interventions
Reactive balance training involves clients experiencing repeated balance perturbations so that they can practice and improve control of reactions to avoid falling after a loss of balance.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Chronic stroke (\>6 months post-stroke)
You may not qualify if:
- Are unable to stand independently without upper-limb support for \>30 seconds and/or walk independently (without a gait aid) for ≥10 metres;
- Have another neurological condition that could affect balance control (e.g., Parkinson's disease);
- Have cognitive impairment (Montreal Cognitive Assessment8 score \<26), or severe language or communication difficulties affecting understanding instructions;
- Have contraindications to RBT (has described by Mansfield et al., 2021), such as osteoporosis, activity restrictions due to cardiac event/surgery, or severe spasticity in the lower extremity; and/or
- Are currently attending in- or out-patient physiotherapy or supervised exercise.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Toronto Rehabilitation Institute
Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2A2, Canada
Related Publications (1)
Majoni N, Inness EL, Jagroop D, Danells CJ, Mansfield A. Investigating the optimal reactive balance training intensity in people with chronic stroke: Study protocol for a randomized control trial. PLoS One. 2025 Sep 9;20(9):e0327937. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0327937. eCollection 2025.
PMID: 40924697DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Avril Mansfield, PhD
University Health Network, Toronto
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 6, 2024
First Posted
August 15, 2024
Study Start
November 11, 2024
Primary Completion (Estimated)
June 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
June 1, 2027
Last Updated
January 27, 2025
Record last verified: 2024-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share