NCT04219696

Brief Summary

Falls in daily life are one of the most significant complications for people with stroke. Fall rates are particularly high soon after discharge from stroke rehabilitation. A new type of balance training, called reactive balance training (RBT), can reduce fall rates after discharge from stroke rehabilitation. In our previous study, RBT was implemented as part of routine care, and as a result, the dose of training was different for each participant; participants completed between one and twelve 30-minute sessions of RBT. Previous research in healthy older adults suggests that a single session of RBT is enough to lead to lasting changes in reactive balance control and reduce fall rates in daily life. It is not clear if the same is true for people with stroke, who have more severe impairments and might need a higher dose of training to achieve the same benefits. The overall goal of this work is to determine the optimal dose of reactive balance training for people with stroke who are attending rehabilitation. This pilot study will determine the feasibility of a clinical trial to address this larger goal. People with sub-acute stroke will be randomly assigned to one of three groups: 1 session, 3 sessions, or 6 sessions of RBT. Each session will be 45 minutes long, and will occur as part of participants' routine out-patient rehabilitation. We will use our experiences with this pilot study to help design a larger study. Specifically, we will use this pilot study to answer the following questions: 1) what is the optimal sample size; 2) how long will it take to reach this sample size; 3) what outcome measures should be used; 4) how feasible is it to prescribe a specific dose of RBT to people with sub-acute stroke; and 5) what two intervention groups should be included in the larger trial?

Trial Health

75
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
36

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable stroke

Timeline
3mo left

Started Aug 2020

Longer than P75 for not_applicable stroke

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
active not recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress95%
Aug 2020Sep 2026

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 17, 2019

Completed
21 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 7, 2020

Completed
8 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 20, 2020

Completed
5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 1, 2025

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 1, 2026

Expected
Last Updated

March 25, 2025

Status Verified

March 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

5 years

First QC Date

December 17, 2019

Last Update Submit

March 20, 2025

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Rate of falls in daily life

    Participants will be asked to report falls ("an event that results in a person coming to rest unintentionally on the ground or other lower level") in the 6 months post-training. Participants will be provided with stamped, addressed postcards to mail to the research team every 2 weeks for 6 months post-training. Postcards will contain a calendar, on which participants will record falls. The research assistant will call participants who do not return the postcard to determine if any falls occurred. The research assistant will contact participants reporting a fall to complete a short questionnaire determining the cause and consequences of the fall.

    6 months post-discharge

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Rate of accrual

    Through study completion, an average of 18 months

  • Rate of missing data

    Through study completion, an average of 18 months

  • Compliance with the intervention

    Through study completion, an average of 18 months

Other Outcomes (6)

  • Chedoke-McMaster Stroke Assessment

    Pre-intervention (at admission), post-intervention (before discharge, approximately 4 weeks), and 6 months post-intervention

  • Mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test

    Pre-intervention (at admission), post-intervention (before discharge, approximately 4 weeks), and 6 months post-intervention

  • Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale

    Pre-intervention (at admission), post-intervention (before discharge, approximately 4 weeks), and 6 months post-intervention

  • +3 more other outcomes

Study Arms (3)

1 session

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Participants will complete one 45-minute session of reactive balance training. Participants will experience 40-60 perturbations during this session. Participants will also complete 5 45-minute 'traditional' balance training sessions.

Other: Reactive balance training

3 sessions

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants will complete three 45-minute sessions of reactive balance training. Participants will experience 40-60 perturbations during each session. Participants will also complete 3 45-minute 'traditional' balance training sessions.

Other: Reactive balance training

6 sessions

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants will complete six 45-minute sessions of reactive balance training. Participants will experience 40-60 perturbations during each session.

Other: Reactive balance training

Interventions

A research physiotherapist will oversee reactive balance training (RBT) to ensure consistent RBT delivery across participants. Training strategies will be individualized to each participant, based on their balance impairments and rehabilitation goals. The RBT program includes multi-directional 'internal' and 'external' balance perturbations. Internal perturbations are achieved by asking the participant to complete tasks that challenge balance control, such that they lose balance when attempting to perform the task (e.g., kicking a soccer ball). External perturbation are delivered manually using a push or pull from the physiotherapist. As participants improve their reactive balance control, difficulty will be increased by shifting task requirements along a continuum from stable to mobile, and from predictable to unpredictable, and by increasing perturbation magnitude or imposing sensory or environmental challenges.

1 session3 sessions6 sessions

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 130 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Sub-acute stroke;
  • Receiving out-patient rehabilitation at the Toronto Rehabilitation Institute;
  • Can stand independently for \>30 seconds;
  • Can walk with or without a gait aid (but without assistance of another person) for \>10 metres; and
  • Living in the community.

You may not qualify if:

  • Completed reactive balance training during in-patient rehabilitation;
  • Lower-extremity amputation, weight-bearing restrictions, recent lower-extremity injury or surgery (e.g., fracture), acute back or lower-limb pain, halo, aspen collar, history of fragility fracture and/or severe osteoporosis/osteopenia, contractures that prevent neutral hip or ankle;
  • Activity restrictions following cardiac event/surgery, abnormal or unstable cardiovascular responses to exercise, arterial dissection;
  • Severe spasticity in the legs;
  • Cognitive impairment (i.e., unable to understand the purpose of training and/or to provide informed consent); and/or
  • Acute illness (e.g., vomiting, fever), extreme obesity (exceeds safety harness weight limits), colostomy bags, indwelling catheter, infection, pressure sore on pelvis or trunk.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Toronto Rehabilitation Institute

Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2A2, Canada

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Mansfield A, Inness EL, Danells CJ, Jagroop D, Bhatt T, Huntley AH. Determining the optimal dose of reactive balance training after stroke: study protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2020 Aug 26;10(8):e038073. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038073.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Stroke

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Cerebrovascular DisordersBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesVascular DiseasesCardiovascular Diseases

Study Officials

  • Avril Mansfield, PhD

    University Health Network, Toronto

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
Outcome measures will be obtained by a research assistant who will be blinded to group allocation.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Scientist

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 17, 2019

First Posted

January 7, 2020

Study Start

August 20, 2020

Primary Completion

September 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2026

Last Updated

March 25, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-03

Locations