Movement Analysis of Stroke Patients When Walking on a Treadmill
1 other identifier
interventional
25
1 country
1
Brief Summary
In daily clinic, the use of treadmills to analyze the gait quality of a patient increases. The advantages of using a treadmill are that a smaller space is needed compared to a 3D lab for motion analysis, more steps can be recorded in shorter time period and patients should not start, stop or rotate during the analyses. One of the systems which can be used to perform motion analysis on a treadmill is the GRAIL. This GRAIL (Gait Real-time Analysis Interactive Lab) consists of an advanced treadmill with force sensors. Patients can walk on this treadmill with an imposed speed (fixed-speed) or at a speed determined by the patient itself (self-paced). Because not everyone is used to walk on a treadmill it is important to know if a person's walking pattern is different when he walks over ground compared to walking on the treadmill. Based on these insights, decisions can be made regarding interventions including treadmill training or this findings can be taking into account during further analysis of walking patterns on a treadmill. For this study stroke patients would be invited for an assessment on the treadmill (1 assessment moment). The movement pattern of these patients would be compared in different conditions:
- (Forward and backward) Walking at comfortable walking speed on the GAITRite
- Walking at comfortable walking speed on the treadmill in fixed speed mode
- Walking at comfortable walking speed +0.2 m/s (faster walking) on the treadmill in fixed speed mode
- Walking at comfortable walking speed on the treadmill in self-paced mode
- Backward walking at comfortable walking speed on the treadmill in fixed speed mode (only if patients are eligible to do so) Hypotheses based on this study protocol:
- Do stroke patients walk different over ground compared to treadmill walking
- Do stroke patients walk different during treadmill walking self-paced compared to fixed speed
- Do stroke patients walk different during treadmill walking fixed speed comfortable walking speed compared to fast walking
- Is there a correlation between upper extremity impairment and arm swing
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable stroke
Started Jan 2020
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable stroke
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 21, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 27, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 6, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 15, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 15, 2020
CompletedApril 8, 2021
January 1, 2020
8 months
October 21, 2019
April 6, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Change in kinematics
Change in full body 3D kinematic analyses during walking (°)
Single point of assessment in one day
Change in kinetics
Change in full body 3D kinetic analyses during walking
Single point of assessment in one day
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Speed variability during self-paced treadmill walking
Single point of assessment in one day
Postural stability test
Baseline assessment before walking trials
Fugl Meyer assessment UL
Baseline assessment before walking trials
Fugl Meyer assessment LL
Baseline assessment before walking trials
Lateral rotation of the scapula
Baseline assessment before walking trials
Other Outcomes (1)
Demographic variables
Before walking trials
Study Arms (5)
GaitRite
EXPERIMENTALPatients will walk on the GaitRite. * forward walking at comfortable gait speed (6 x 10 meter) * backward walking at comfortable gait speed (4 x 10 meter)
Treadmill walking self-paced
EXPERIMENTALPatients will walk on the treadmill in self-paced mode. They can control walking speed by themselves. Patient walks for 3 minutes for every condition = data will be recorded for 1 minute.
Treadmill walking fixed speed - comfortable speed
EXPERIMENTALPatients will walk on the treadmill in fixed speed mode. They will walk at comfortable gait speed, which is determined in the familiarization period. Patient walks for 3 minutes for every condition = data will be recorded for 1 minute.
Treadmill walking fixed speed - fast speed
EXPERIMENTALPatients will walk on the treadmill in fixed speed mode. They will walk at a gait speed, which is 1 minimal clinical difference faster than their comfortable gait speed. Patient walks for 3 minutes for every condition = data will be recorded for 1 minute.
Treadmill walking fixed speed - backward walking
EXPERIMENTALPatients will walk on the treadmill in fixed speed mode. Patient will walk backwards on the treadmill if they are able to. Patient walks for 3 minutes for every condition = data will be recorded for 1 minute.
Interventions
Patients walk over ground on a mat with sensors and on a treadmill with sensors (in different conditions) to compare their movement pattern. Also the movement pattern will be compared between walking at comfortable walking speed en fast walking. Finally, the correlation between upper extremity impairment and arm swing will be investigated.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Stroke patients with the ability to walk without walking devices for 6 minutes without rest (indoor walking). Use of AFO is allowed if necessary.
You may not qualify if:
- Traumatic brain lesions (car accident, fall with bike, …)
- Other disorders such as neurologic, musculoskeletal, respiratory or severe cardiovascular disorders that affected gait performance
- Bilateral stroke
- Cerebellar stroke
- Orthopedic surgery lower limbs in the past
- Cognitive or language impairments that prevent the patients from understand simple orders
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University Ghentlead
- University Hospital, Ghentcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Ghent University Hospital
Ghent, 9000, Belgium
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- BASIC SCIENCE
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 21, 2019
First Posted
November 27, 2019
Study Start
January 6, 2020
Primary Completion
September 15, 2020
Study Completion
September 15, 2020
Last Updated
April 8, 2021
Record last verified: 2020-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share