Acceptance and Commitment Therapy Based Group Psychoeducation for Nursing Students
Effect of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy Based Group Psychoeducatıon Applied to Nursing Students on Psychological Flexibility and Somatic Symptoms
1 other identifier
interventional
54
1 country
1
Brief Summary
In this study, the effects of acceptance and commitment therapy-based group psychoeducation applied to nursing students on psychological flexibility and somatic symptoms will be examined. The research will be carried out as a randomized controlled experimental study with a pre-test-post-test and follow-up design.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2024
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 18, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 13, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 11, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 14, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 13, 2024
CompletedOctober 23, 2024
August 1, 2024
2 months
August 11, 2024
October 19, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in the Psychological Flexibility Scale
The Psychological Flexibility Scale consists of 28 items and five sub-dimensions. The sub-dimensions of the scale are: "Values and committed action", "Contact with the present moment", "Acceptance", "Self as Context" and "Defusion." The increase in the scores obtained from the sub-dimensions and total scores of the scale means that individuals are psychologically flexible. The lowest score that can be obtained from the scale is 28, and the highest is 196.
Baseline, 8th week, 1st month follow-up, 3rd month follow-up) (Pretest-posttest follow-up experimental design
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Bradford Somatic Symptom Inventory Change
screening, baseline, 8th week, 1st month follow-up, 3rd month follow-up) (Pretest-posttest follow-up experimental design)
Other Outcomes (2)
Inclusion Form
screening
Participant Information Form
baseline, 8th week, 1st month follow-up, 3rd month follow-up) (Pretest-posttest follow-up experimental design)
Study Arms (2)
Acceptance and commitment therapy based group psychoeducation
EXPERIMENTALAcceptance and commitment therapybased group psychoeducation to be carried out with the experimental group is planned as 8 sessions. The sessions are planned to be held in 3 groups of 9 people each. The duration of a session is planned to be approximately 90 minutes. Group psychoeducation with the experimental group will be carried out face-to-face every week. The appropriate day for the sessions will be decided together with themembers of each group. The same group session will be held on the same day and time every week.
No Intervention: Waiting list group
NO INTERVENTIONAfter the follow-up tests were completed, it was planned to apply the 8-session group psychoeducation applied to the intervention group in the same way to the control group, upon their request. Intervention: Acceptance and commitment therapy-based group psychoeducation aimed at increasing students' psychological flexibility and reducing their somatic symptoms.
Interventions
Acceptance and commitment therapy-based group psychoeducation aimed at increasing nursing students' psychological flexibility and reducing their somatic symptoms.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Volunteering to participate in the study
- No problems understanding and speaking Turkish
- Having moderate and high-level somatic symptoms (Scoring 26 or higher on the Bradford Somatic Inventory)
You may not qualify if:
- Scoring 25 or less on the Bradford Somatic Inventory
- Having been diagnosed with a chronic/systemic physical illness
- Having been diagnosed with a psychiatric illness
- Being on medication for a current physical or psychiatric illness
- Have received or are receiving individual or group psychotherapy/counseling programs within the last two years
- Being a foreign national
- Being pregnant
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Tugba Yildirimlead
Study Sites (1)
Tuğba Yildirim
Merkez, Çankırı, 18200, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (11)
Üzar Özçetin, Y.S. (2020).Somatik belirti bozukluğu ve ilişkili bozukluklar ve hemşirelik bakımı. (Ed: Akgün Çıtak E, Hiçdurmaz, D). Psikiyatri Hemşireliği Akıl Notları. 1. Baskı. Ankara: Güneş Tıp Kitabevleri. s:229-245.
BACKGROUNDTowsend, M. (2016). Ruh Sağlığı ve Psikiyatri Hemşireliğinin Temelleri Kanıta Dayalı Uygulama Bakım Kavramları. (Çev.Ed: Tangül Özcan, C., Gürhan, N.) Ankara: Akademisyen Kitabevi. 6. Baskı. s: 516-544.
BACKGROUNDKöse,S.,Tekintas, N.S., Durmus,F. B., Akın,E., & Sayar, K. (2017). Reliability, validity,and factorial structure of the Turkish version of the Bradford Somatic Inventory (Turkish BSI-44) in a university student sample. Psychiatry and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 27(1), 62-69.
BACKGROUNDKotan, Z. (2021).Somatik belirti bozukluğu ve ilişkili bozukluklarda grup terapileri. Coşar B, editör. (Ed: Coşar, B.) Somatik Belirti ve İlişkili Bozukluklar. 1. Baskı. Ankara: Türkiye Klinikleri. s: 68-73.
BACKGROUNDKabadayı Şahin, E. (2017). Bedensel belirti bozukluğu ve oksidatif stres. Yıldırım Beyazıt Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Ruh Sağlığı ve Hastalıkları Ana Bilim Dalı Tıpta Uzmanlık tezi, Ankara.
BACKGROUNDIshizu K, Shimoda Y, Ohtsuki T. The reciprocal relations between experiential avoidance, school stressor, and psychological stress response among Japanese adolescents. PLoS One. 2017 Nov 22;12(11):e0188368. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0188368. eCollection 2017.
PMID: 29166647BACKGROUNDHayes,S.C. (2004). Acceptanceand commitment therapy, relational frametheory and thethird wave of bahavioral and cognitivetherapies. Behavior Therapy, 35, 639-665
BACKGROUNDHartman,T., Blankenstein. N., Molenaar. B., & Al.E. N.H.G.(2013). Guideline on medically unexplained symptoms (MUS). Huisarts Wet, 56(5):2-18.
BACKGROUNDCrary P. Beliefs, behaviors, and health of undergraduate nursing students. Holist Nurs Pract. 2013 Mar-Apr;27(2):74-88. doi: 10.1097/HNP.0b013e318280f75e.
PMID: 23399707BACKGROUNDBond FW, Hayes SC, Baer RA, Carpenter KM, Guenole N, Orcutt HK, Waltz T, Zettle RD. Preliminary psychometric properties of the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II: a revised measure of psychological inflexibility and experiential avoidance. Behav Ther. 2011 Dec;42(4):676-88. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2011.03.007. Epub 2011 May 25.
PMID: 22035996BACKGROUNDArch, J. J., & Craske, M. G. (2008). Acceptance and commitment therapy and cognitive behavioral therapy for anxiety disorders: Different treatments, similar mechanisms? Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 15(4), 263-279.
BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Tuğba YILDIRIM
Cankiri Karatekin University, Cankiri, Turkey, 18200
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Due to the nature of the study, it is not possible to blind the researcher implementing the intervention and the participants. To prevent bias in the study, the pretest will be applied before randomization. It is planned to blind the statistical and report writing process in the study. The assignment of students to the intervention and control groups will be made by a statistician independent of the study. The researcher and students will not know which group they are in until the application begins. After applying the follow-up tests, the researcher will code the data as A and B groups and transfer it to SPSS. With this method, it is planned that the statistician will do the analysis and reporting without knowing which group is the intervention and which group is the control group. It is planned to explain the codes of the groups after the analysis and reporting of the data. In this way, detection bias, statistical bias, and reporting bias will be prevented.
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Research Assistant
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 11, 2024
First Posted
August 14, 2024
Study Start
April 18, 2024
Primary Completion
June 13, 2024
Study Completion
September 13, 2024
Last Updated
October 23, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share