NCT06550479

Brief Summary

This study aims to determine which type of distal arteriovenous fistula (SBAVF, RCAVF, and RCAVF with venous branch patch) is most clinically favorable. The recommendations and scientific evidence do not suggest which option should be chosen initially. The investigators expect that results will show which type of the anastomosis should be preferred.

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
180

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
51mo left

Started Jan 2024

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress36%
Jan 2024Jul 2030

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2024

Completed
7 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 30, 2024

Completed
14 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 13, 2024

Completed
3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 31, 2027

Expected
3 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 31, 2030

Last Updated

August 13, 2024

Status Verified

August 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

3.6 years

First QC Date

July 30, 2024

Last Update Submit

August 8, 2024

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Primary patency:

    The interval between VA creation and the first re-intervention (intervention free VA survival) for VA dysfunction or thrombosis, the time of measurement of patency or the time of its abandonment

    12 months

  • Assisted primary patency:

    The interval between VA creation and the first occlusion (thrombosis free VA survival) or measurement of patency including operative/endovascular interventions to maintain the VA.

    36 months

  • Secondary patency

    The interval between VA creation and the abandonment of this VA (i.e. thrombosis) after one or more interventions or the time of measurement of patency including achievement of a censored event (death, change of HD modality, loss of follow-up).

    36 months

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Mature VA

    6 weeks

Study Arms (3)

SBAVF

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients enrolled for snuffbox fistula creation.

Procedure: AVF

RCAVF

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients enrolled for RCAVF

Procedure: AVF

RCAVF with venous branch patch

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients enrolled for RCAVF with venous branch patch

Procedure: AVF

Interventions

AVFPROCEDURE

Distal forearm AVF for hemodialysis.

RCAVFRCAVF with venous branch patchSBAVF

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Aged \>18 years
  • Chronic kidney disease with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) \<20 mL/min/1.73 m2

You may not qualify if:

  • Heart failure of New York Heart Association functional class III or IV,
  • Episode of cardio- or cerebrovascular event or receiving intervention therapy within 3 months prior to screening.
  • The patient had the primary anastomosis in the past on ipsilateral extremity

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Department of Nephrology and Transplantation Medicine

Wroclaw, 50-556, Poland

RECRUITING

Related Publications (6)

  • Tordoir J, Canaud B, Haage P, Konner K, Basci A, Fouque D, Kooman J, Martin-Malo A, Pedrini L, Pizzarelli F, Tattersall J, Vennegoor M, Wanner C, ter Wee P, Vanholder R. EBPG on Vascular Access. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2007 May;22 Suppl 2:ii88-117. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfm021. No abstract available.

  • Roy-Chaudhury P, Kelly BS, Melhem M, Zhang J, Li J, Desai P, Munda R, Heffelfinger SC. Vascular access in hemodialysis: issues, management, and emerging concepts. Cardiol Clin. 2005 Aug;23(3):249-73. doi: 10.1016/j.ccl.2005.04.004.

  • Stoner L, Sabatier MJ. Use of ultrasound for non-invasive assessment of flow-mediated dilation. J Atheroscler Thromb. 2012;19(5):407-21. doi: 10.5551/jat.11395. Epub 2012 Mar 1.

  • Jemcov TK. Morphologic and functional vessels characteristics assessed by ultrasonography for prediction of radiocephalic fistula maturation. J Vasc Access. 2013 Oct-Dec;14(4):356-63. doi: 10.5301/jva.5000163. Epub 2013 Jul 1.

  • Bylsma LC, Gage SM, Reichert H, Dahl SLM, Lawson JH. Arteriovenous Fistulae for Haemodialysis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Efficacy and Safety Outcomes. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2017 Oct;54(4):513-522. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2017.06.024. Epub 2017 Aug 23.

  • Al-Jaishi AA, Oliver MJ, Thomas SM, Lok CE, Zhang JC, Garg AX, Kosa SD, Quinn RR, Moist LM. Patency rates of the arteriovenous fistula for hemodialysis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Kidney Dis. 2014 Mar;63(3):464-78. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2013.08.023. Epub 2013 Oct 30.

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Comparison of three different distal AVF types
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 30, 2024

First Posted

August 13, 2024

Study Start

January 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 31, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 31, 2030

Last Updated

August 13, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-08

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations