Prosthetic Femoral Access for Haemodialysis
Tunneled Femoral Catheter Versus Femoro-femoral Arteriovenous Graft as a Lower-Extremity Hemodialysis Vascular Access: A Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
48
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study will compare the outcomes of tunneled femoral catheter and femoro-femoral arteriovenous graft as a bailout procedure for hemodialysis in chronic kidney disease patients with exhausted upper-extremity and chest-wall vascular accesses regarding survival rate, complications, and quality of life
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Dec 2020
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 10, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 10, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2022
CompletedFebruary 10, 2021
February 1, 2021
2 years
January 10, 2021
February 4, 2021
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Primary patency
In case of TFC: Normally an extracorporeal blood flow should be about 300 ml/min. based on this, the catheter dysfunction can be defined by the first occurrence of either (1) peak blood flow of 200 ml per minute or less for 30 minutes during a dialysis treatment, (2) mean blood flow of 250 ml per minute or less during two consecutive dialysis treatments, or (3) inability to initiate dialysis owing to inadequate blood flow, after attempts to restore patency have been attempted. \- In case of AVG, stenosis \> 50% of the prosthesis diameter or complete occlusion is considered significant. This can be assessed by duplex ultrasonography every six months or when the patency is questionable. The patency rates will be determined according to the reporting standards, set by the Committee of Reporting Standards for arteriovenous hemodialysis accesses.
12 months postoperatively
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Secondary patency
24 months
Special adverse events complicating lower-extremity haemodialysis access
24 months
Patient satisfaction
6 & 12 months postoperatively
Other Outcomes (3)
Operation time
24 months
Hospital stay
24 months
Survival rate
24 months
Study Arms (2)
Tunneled femoral catheter
ACTIVE COMPARATOR20 patients with end stage renal disease and exhausted upper-extremity and chest-wall vascular accesses will be randomly allocated to this group
Femoral artery-femoral arteriovenous graft
ACTIVE COMPARATORa straight or loop configuration 28patients with end stage renal disease and exhausted upper-extremity and chest-wall vascular accesses will be randomly allocated to this group
Interventions
Patients with end-stage chronic kidney disease exhausted upper-extremity and chest-wall vascular accesses will be submitted to creation of a Lower-Extremity Hemodialysis Vascular either through application of tunneled femoral catheter
Patients with end-stage chronic kidney disease exhausted upper-extremity and chest-wall vascular accesses will be submitted to creation of a Lower-Extremity Hemodialysis Vascular either through application of tunneled femoral catheter
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- All end-stage renal disease patients who complain of exhaustion of all upper-extremity and chest-wall vascular accesses.
- ≥ 15 years
You may not qualify if:
- patients with previous history or evident deep venous thrombosis
- varicose veins
- femoral vein stenosis
- arterial insufficiency
- severe groin or limb infection.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Mohammed Mosallam Mohammed Ibrahim
Al Mansurah, Dakahleyya, 35511, Egypt
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Mohammed Mosallam M Ibrahim, Specialist of Vascular Surgery
CONTACT
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Specialist of Vascular Surgery, MD candidate
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 10, 2021
First Posted
February 10, 2021
Study Start
December 1, 2020
Primary Completion
December 1, 2022
Study Completion
December 1, 2022
Last Updated
February 10, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-02