NCT06547762

Brief Summary

Children and youth recovering from acquired injuries typically receive therapy via in-patient or outpatient rehabilitation (OPR). Families from peripheral areas often face significant time and financial burdens to access treatment. Over the past decade, evidence supporting the effectiveness of remote (online) rehabilitation has increased. Objectives: 1. Identify facilitators and barriers to hybrid service adoption. 2. Develop a hybrid telerehabilitation program for youth that is at least equivalent (non-inferior) to conventional, in-person therapy. 3. Compare hybrid rehabilitation to in-person rehabilitation at two centers in Israel in terms of: Adherence to therapy, Therapeutic alliance, Perceived quality of care (families and therapists), Functional effectiveness (measured by pre-post change in the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory, PEDI), Cost-effectiveness (including training requirements, physical space requirements, and costs); 4. Provide best practice recommendations for hybrid rehabilitation in children. Research Methods: Focus Groups: Experts will develop a two-month hybrid program for approximately 200 children in OPR, commencing one month after in-person rehabilitation. Evaluation Metrics: Therapy adherence, therapeutic alliance, and perceived quality of care will be assessed monthly and compared to in-person treatment. Insights will inform best practice guidelines for hybrid telerehabilitation. Data Collection: Thematic Analysis: Analyzing focus group information. Comparative Metrics: Comparing measures of adherence, therapeutic alliance, and perceived quality of care between hybrid and in-person programs. Difference-in-Difference Approach: Assessing functional differences between in-person and remote therapy. Cost Analysis: Estimating direct and indirect costs per child for in-person versus remote rehabilitation.

Trial Health

55
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
200

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2023

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
enrolling by invitation

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 16, 2023

Completed
11 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 17, 2024

Completed
23 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 9, 2024

Completed
1.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2025

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

August 9, 2024

Status Verified

August 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

2.3 years

First QC Date

July 17, 2024

Last Update Submit

August 6, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

Occupational TherapyPhysical TherapySpeech and Language PathologyPsychologyTelerehabilitationHybrid Rehabilitation

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (5)

  • Adherence to therapy

    Each child is prescribed a rehabilitation program. This outcome will follow the number of times that the child participated in the sessions- comparing to the prescribed program. For example if the child was supposed to participate in 5 weekly sessions and only participated in 3 sessions. The ratio of number of treatments performed to the number prescribed=adherence. A higher value indicates ahigher adherence level.

    2 months

  • Therapeutic alliance

    We will use the Working Alliance Inventory (WAI) (Horvath \& Greenberg, 1989), a self-report questionnaire designed to assess the structure of the therapeutic alliance. The items are rated on a 7-point scale (never to always). A higher scores reflect a higher quality of therapeutic alliance.

    2 months

  • Perceived quality of care- therapists

    The Clinician Evaluation of Tele rehabilitation Service (CETS) (Krasovsky et al., 2021) questionnaire for evaluating clinicians' feedback on tele rehabilitation will be completed. The scale is 1-5, with the higher score being better.

    2 months

  • Perceived quality of care- families

    For families the System Usability Scale (SUS) will be used, it is a10 item 5-point Likert scale to assess the user experience and perception of quality of care of the hybrid and in-person programs (Brooke, 1996). A higher score is better

    2 months

  • Cost-effectiveness of hybrid therapy

    We will assess direct costs of in-person services, including direct payment schedules per week, for each treatment modality. Additionally, we will ask parents to complete information on travel (time and costs) and related expenses. The costs will be reported in monetary units

    2 months

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Improved Function

    2 months

Study Arms (1)

Hybrid rehabilitation

EXPERIMENTAL

Children will receive one day of remote rehabilitation. All other days children will receive therapy at hospital

Other: Hybrid approach (in-person and remote) to pediatric rehabilitation: A look beyond the COVID-19 crisis

Interventions

Hybrid rehabilitation. Out patients will receive one day a week of remote therapy and the remaining (1-4 days) in person at rehabilitation hospital

Hybrid rehabilitation

Eligibility Criteria

Age3 Years - 21 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Children with physical disability
  • Children receiving treatment via the out patient department
  • Children who receive more than one day of treatment a week.
  • Children who are able to follow instructions
  • Families who can interact with a computer and other technologies

You may not qualify if:

  • Children who are visually impaired
  • Children who are hearing impaired
  • Children who receive hydrotherapy every day of their rehabilitation program

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Alyn Pediatric and Adolescent Rehabilitation Center

Jerusalem, 91090, Israel

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Cerebral PalsyBrain Injuries, TraumaticMusculoskeletal DiseasesSpeech

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Brain Damage, ChronicBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesBrain InjuriesCraniocerebral TraumaTrauma, Nervous SystemWounds and InjuriesVerbal BehaviorCommunicationBehavior

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SEQUENTIAL
Model Details: Control group and Intervention group
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
PI, PARC ALYN; Deputy Director General

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 17, 2024

First Posted

August 9, 2024

Study Start

August 16, 2023

Primary Completion

December 1, 2025

Study Completion

December 1, 2025

Last Updated

August 9, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-08

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations