Realistic in Generation of HEp-2 Cell Images Using Latent Diffusion Models: a Multi-center Visual Turing Test
Evaluating the Realism of ANA HEp-2 Cell Images Synthesized Using Latent Diffusion Models: A Multi-center Visual Turing Test
1 other identifier
observational
300
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The objective of this prospective observational study is to rigorously examine the feasibility and efficacy of utilizing latent diffusion models for data augmentation in anti-nuclear antibody (ANA) Hep-2 cell immunofluorescence images. The main question it aims to answer is: Can the application of such models potentially enhance the data quality, increase sample diversity, or improve the accuracy and efficiency of subsequent analytical processes (like disease diagnosis and classification) when utilized with ANA-related images?
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Sep 2024
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 23, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 7, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2026
ExpectedAugust 7, 2024
July 1, 2024
1.2 years
July 23, 2024
August 2, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The realistic of images synthesized by diffusion models
The investigators conducted a study using the visual Turing test method, measuring through a questionnaire format, and assessed the measurement results using a 5-point Likert Scale. The 5-point Likert Scale assesses participants' opinions on the quality of images through five response options: Real, Much like, Uncertain, Not quite like, Fake. It calculates scores by assigning numbers (e.g., 5 to 1) to these options, summing up scores for each participant. Results are evaluated by analyzing the distribution of scores, including mean scores, and assessing their reliability and validity. Additionally, the investigator calculated a range of parameters utilized for internal model assessment, including: including precision, recall, F1 score, and mean average precision (mAP).
Baseline
Secondary Outcomes (2)
The impact of the AI model's output on the participants
Baseline
The time taken of ANA pattern interpretation
Baseline
Study Arms (2)
experts
with over 20 years of experience in ANA-IIF reading
junior cytopathologists
less than 5 years of academic medical experience
Interventions
determining the ANA pattern type with or without referring to the results of AI model output.
Eligibility Criteria
We are recruiting cytopathologists from clinical laboratories in multiple medical institutions worldwide who specialize in interpreting anti-nuclear antibody (ANA) patterns to participate in a visual Turing test.
You may qualify if:
- Originating from reputable medical institutions
- Possessing relevant certification and qualifications
- Having over one year of experience in interpreting anti-nuclear antibody (ANA) patterns within a laboratory setting
You may not qualify if:
- Lacking relevant professional certification and qualifications
- Without experience in interpreting ANA patterns
- Unwilling to accept the rules and informed consent of the visual Turing test
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (6)
Zeng J, Gao X, Gao L, Yu Y, Shen L, Pan X. Recognition of rare antinuclear antibody patterns based on a novel attention-based enhancement framework. Brief Bioinform. 2024 Jan 22;25(2):bbad531. doi: 10.1093/bib/bbad531.
PMID: 38279651BACKGROUNDRahman S, Wang L, Sun C, Zhou L. Deep learning based HEp-2 image classification: A comprehensive review. Med Image Anal. 2020 Oct;65:101764. doi: 10.1016/j.media.2020.101764. Epub 2020 Jul 7.
PMID: 32745976BACKGROUNDHobson P, Lovell BC, Percannella G, Vento M, Wiliem A. Benchmarking human epithelial type 2 interphase cells classification methods on a very large dataset. Artif Intell Med. 2015 Nov;65(3):239-50. doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2015.08.001. Epub 2015 Aug 13.
PMID: 26303104BACKGROUNDNiehues JM, Muller-Franzes G, Schirris Y, Wagner SJ, Jendrusch M, Kloor M, Pearson AT, Muti HS, Hewitt KJ, Veldhuizen GP, Zigutyte L, Truhn D, Kather JN. Using histopathology latent diffusion models as privacy-preserving dataset augmenters improves downstream classification performance. Comput Biol Med. 2024 Jun;175:108410. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2024.108410. Epub 2024 Apr 4.
PMID: 38678938BACKGROUNDSelim M, Zhang J, Brooks MA, Wang G, Chen J. DiffusionCT: Latent Diffusion Model for CT Image Standardization. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2024 Jan 11;2023:624-633. eCollection 2023.
PMID: 38222387BACKGROUNDMarouf M, Machart P, Bansal V, Kilian C, Magruder DS, Krebs CF, Bonn S. Realistic in silico generation and augmentation of single-cell RNA-seq data using generative adversarial networks. Nat Commun. 2020 Jan 9;11(1):166. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-14018-z.
PMID: 31919373BACKGROUND
Related Links
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Guangyu Chen, PhD
Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Target Duration
- 6 Months
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 23, 2024
First Posted
August 7, 2024
Study Start
September 1, 2024
Primary Completion
December 1, 2025
Study Completion (Estimated)
June 1, 2026
Last Updated
August 7, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share