NCT07314125

Brief Summary

Evaluating ChatGPT-5 for Detecting Potential Drug-Drug Interactions in Intensive Care: A Comparative Analysis with a Clinical Decision Support System Background: Polypharmacy is a frequent challenge in intensive care units (ICUs), where critically ill patients are exposed to multiple concurrent medications. This situation significantly increases the risk of potential drug-drug interactions (pDDIs), which may contribute to adverse drug events, prolonged ICU stays, and higher morbidity and mortality rates. Ensuring timely and accurate detection of pDDIs is therefore a cornerstone of patient safety in critical care settings. Traditional rule-based clinical decision support systems (CDSSs), such as the UpToDate Drug Interaction Checker, provide standardized alerts but may have limitations in contextual interpretation and adaptability. Recently, large language models (LLMs), such as ChatGPT-4.0, have emerged as advanced tools with natural language processing capabilities, potentially offering a novel approach to medication safety. Objective: This study aims to compare the performance of ChatGPT-4.0 with the UpToDate Drug Interaction Checker in identifying, classifying, and interpreting potential drug-drug interactions within real ICU patient medication orders. Methods: A retrospective dataset of ICU patient orders will be systematically analyzed using both ChatGPT-4.0 and the UpToDate Drug Interaction Checker. Each potential interaction will be assessed for sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and clinical relevance. Discrepancies between the two systems will be documented and evaluated by independent critical care experts. Statistical analysis will be performed to compare detection rates and the qualitative depth of interaction explanations provided by each tool. Expected Outcomes: The study is expected to determine whether ChatGPT-4.0, as an AI-based system, can enhance the detection of clinically meaningful drug-drug interactions compared to traditional CDSS. The results may inform future integration of generative AI into ICU clinical workflows and contribute to safer pharmacotherapy practices in critical care. Conclusion: By directly comparing a state-of-the-art LLM with a widely used rule-based system, this study seeks to highlight the strengths, weaknesses, and potential clinical implications of generative AI in the domain of drug safety.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
101

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2025

Shorter than P25 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2025

Completed
1 day until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 2, 2025

Completed
29 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 1, 2025

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 10, 2025

Completed
23 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 2, 2026

Completed
Last Updated

January 2, 2026

Status Verified

December 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

1 day

First QC Date

December 10, 2025

Last Update Submit

December 23, 2025

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Sensitivity of pDDI Detection

    September 1 2025 to october 1 2025

  • Accuracy of Drug-Drug Interaction Detection of chatgpt

    from seprember 1 2025 to october 1 2025

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

The study population consists of adult patients (≥18 years) admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) for at least 48 hours at a tertiary care hospital. Eligible patients received four or more concurrent medications during their ICU stay, and only those with complete clinical and medication records were included. Patients with incomplete drug or interaction data, those receiving experimental or unproven drugs, as well as pediatric or pregnant patients, were excluded

You may qualify if:

  • Patients aged 18 years or older
  • Admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) for at least 48 hours
  • Receipt of five or more medications concurrently during ICU stay
  • Availability of complete clinical data and medication lists

You may not qualify if:

  • Cases with incomplete medication or interaction data
  • Patients receiving experimental or unproven drugs
  • Pediatric patients or those with pregnancy

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Bursa Yuksek Ihtisas Research and Education Hospital

Bursa, Bursa, 16235, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Riera P, Sole N, Suarez JC, Lopez PA, Fonts N, Rodriguez-Farre N, Fernandez de Gamarra-Martinez E, Moran I. Drug-drug interactions in an intensive care unit and comparison of updates in two databases. Farm Hosp. 2022 Aug 25;46(5):290-295.

    PMID: 36183229BACKGROUND

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
OTHER
Time Perspective
OTHER
Target Duration
1 Day
Sponsor Type
OTHER GOV
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Associate proffesor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 10, 2025

First Posted

January 2, 2026

Study Start

September 1, 2025

Primary Completion

September 2, 2025

Study Completion

October 1, 2025

Last Updated

January 2, 2026

Record last verified: 2025-12

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

This is a point-prevalence study using ICU patient records. Due to ethical and privacy considerations, individual participant data will not be shared outside the study team. De-identified individual participant data underlying the study findings may be shared upon reasonable request.

Locations