Bolt CSP-M Holter Study
Intracardiac Electrical Characteristics of LBBAP
1 other identifier
observational
75
1 country
2
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to investigate the cardiac electrical characteristics in different pacing outputs and body positions in LBB area pacing (LBBAP), from which the findings may help to develop and support data validation of a novel algorithm for LBB capture determination for LBBAP.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Aug 2024
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 1, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 6, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 13, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 30, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 30, 2026
September 29, 2025
September 1, 2025
1.9 years
August 1, 2024
September 23, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Intracardiac electrical characteristics in different pacing outputs.
12-lead ECG and LBBAP EGM characteristics and duration in different pacing outputs.
received LBBAP therapy >= 1 month for 1 to 4 months (including 1 and 4 month); and an optional follow-up 6 month after the enrollment
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Intracardiac electrical characteristics under different body position.
received LBBAP therapy >= 1 month for 1 to 4 months (including 1 and 4 month); and an optional follow-up 6 month after the enrollment
The correlation between LBB capture status and LBBAP EGM characteristics
received LBBAP therapy >= 1 month for 1 to 4 months (including 1 and 4 month); and an optional follow-up 6 month after the enrollment
Interventions
No intervention
Eligibility Criteria
The study selected two study site in China. One is a Tertiary A hospital in Shanghai, and another is a cardiovascular specialty hospital in Zhejiang Province. Both the two sites locate in the south east of China. This study will enroll 70 subjects who meet all the inclusion and exclusion criteria from the patients who have received LBBAP therapies from the two hospitals.
You may qualify if:
- Patients aged \>=18 years
- Patients who are willing to provide Informed Consent
- Patients who have received LBBAP therapy \>= 1 month for 1 to 4 months (including 1 and 4 month)
- Patients implanted with a single/dual-chamber pacemaker or a CRT-P with LBBAP lead connected to RV port
- Implanted device can provide at least 3-channel real-time intracardiac electrogram
You may not qualify if:
- Patients who are pregnant or have a plan for pregnancy during the study
- Patients who have medical conditions that would limit study participation
- Patients who were already enrolled in clinical trial(s) which would impact study participation
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Shanghai Chest Hospital
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China
Zhejiang Greentown Cardiovascular Hospital
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
Related Publications (4)
Huang W, Su L, Wu S, Xu L, Xiao F, Zhou X, Ellenbogen KA. A Novel Pacing Strategy With Low and Stable Output: Pacing the Left Bundle Branch Immediately Beyond the Conduction Block. Can J Cardiol. 2017 Dec;33(12):1736.e1-1736.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2017.09.013. Epub 2017 Sep 22.
PMID: 29173611BACKGROUNDChen X, Qian Z, Zou F, Wang Y, Zhang X, Qiu Y, Hou X, Zhou X, Vijayaraman P, Zou J. Differentiating left bundle branch pacing and left ventricular septal pacing: An algorithm based on intracardiac electrophysiology. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2022 Mar;33(3):448-457. doi: 10.1111/jce.15350. Epub 2022 Jan 12.
PMID: 34978368BACKGROUNDZhou Y, Wang J, Wei Y, Zhang W, Yang Y, Rui S, Ju C. Left ventricular septal pacing versus left bundle branch pacing in the treatment of atrioventricular block. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2022 May;27(3):e12944. doi: 10.1111/anec.12944. Epub 2022 Mar 10.
PMID: 35267228BACKGROUNDWu S, Chen X, Wang S, Xu L, Xiao F, Huang Z, Zheng R, Jiang L, Vijayaraman P, Sharma PS, Su L, Huang W. Evaluation of the Criteria to Distinguish Left Bundle Branch Pacing From Left Ventricular Septal Pacing. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2021 Sep;7(9):1166-1177. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2021.02.018. Epub 2021 Apr 28.
PMID: 33933414BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE ONLY
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 1, 2024
First Posted
August 6, 2024
Study Start
August 13, 2024
Primary Completion (Estimated)
June 30, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
June 30, 2026
Last Updated
September 29, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share