Comparison of Architectural and Performance Adaptations of Hip Extension Exercise Under Gravitational or Inertial Loading Conditions
1 other identifier
interventional
32
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The main objective of this study is to investigate training-induced adaptations in Biceps femoris long head (BFlh) architecture and performance measures such as muscle strength, jumping, and power variables after following 6 weeks of resistance training program with gravitational or inertial hip extension (HE) exercise and a subsequent detraining period, comparing those adaptations with a control group. In addition, this study aims to determine the time course of BFlh architectural adaptations throughout a 6-week training intervention.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2019
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 30, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 30, 2021
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 27, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 5, 2024
CompletedAugust 9, 2024
August 1, 2024
1.8 years
July 27, 2024
August 5, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
Fascicle length
Two-dimensional images of the Biceps femoris long head (BFlh) architecture were captured using B-mode ultrasonography. All imaging was conducted with participants lying prone with their hips and knees in a neutral and fully extended position.Three ultrasound images were taken and stored for analysis through the ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health, USA). The most visible fascicle in each image was used for measurement of fascicle pennation angle (i.e., angle between the fascicle and the intermediate aponeurosis) and estimation of fascicle length using a validated equation: FL = sin (AA + 90°) × MT ÷ sin (180° - (AA + 180° - PA))
Baseline, at weeks 2 and 3 of the intervention, at the end of the 6 weeks of training and 4 weeks after this (detraining period)
Muscle Strength Assessment
Knee flexion was assessed with subjects in prone position performing knee flexor maximal isometrics contractions with a knee angle of approximately 15 degrees. For hip extension, a resisted hip extension was requested with the subjects lying in the prone position with their legs straight. Hip adduction was evaluated in a supine position with the hips at 45º flexion, requesting an maximal isometrics contraction adduction with a resistance in the internal condyle.
Baseline, at the end of the 6 weeks of training and 4 weeks after this (detraining period)
Jump performance
CMJ and SJ, utilizing the MyJump 2 application on an iPad Pro (at 240 frames per second, high-definition video resolution). In the CMJ, participants initiated the jump from a standing position, performed a preparatory movement by bending their knees to 90° flexion, and then jumped upward as high as possible without pausing between movements. Similarly, for the SJ, participants began from a standardized position with knees flexed at 90°, and then jumped as high as possible with hands on their hips. Throughout both tests, participants were instructed to maintain their hands on their hips to minimize lateral and horizontal displacement, ensuring accurate vertical jump measurement.
Baseline, at the end of the 6 weeks of training and 4 weeks after this (detraining period)
Power
Power was calculated in both modalities (i.e., HE gravitational and inertial) as the product of velocity and force. The velocity was calculated using the MuscleLab 4020e linear encoder (Ergotest Technology AS, Porsgrunn, Norway). For gravitational loading (i.e. constant mass), the force was calculated as the product of mass and acceleration. For inertial loading, the force was calculated using a force gauge that was anchored along the rope, between a pulley and the proximal end of the second rope.
Baseline, at the end of the 6 weeks of training and 4 weeks after this (detraining period)
Soreness
Participants were asked "How sore do you feel in your hamstrings?" and rated their soreness on a 10-point Likert Scale (1 = No Soreness, 3 = Minimal Soreness, 5 = Moderate Soreness, 8 = Very Sore, 10 = Extremely Sore)
From session 1 (the beginning of week 1) to session 12 (the end of week 6), at the beginning and end of each session.
Study Arms (3)
Inertial
EXPERIMENTALHip extension exercise performed under inertial loading conditions using the EPTE Inertial Concept (Ionclinics SL, L'Alcudia, Spain) during six weeks with two sessions per week. The EPTE Inertial Concept is an inertial device that combines a series of output pulleys and telescopic arms, capable of implementing 6 disks of different weights and radii.
Gravitational
EXPERIMENTALHip extension exercise performed under gravitational loading conditions using free-weight equipment during six weeks with two sessions per week.
Control
NO INTERVENTIONParticipans was advised to continue their regular levels of physical activity but not to perform any lower body resistance training
Interventions
Hip extension exercise with gravitational load
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- at least two years of resistance training experience
- not have any injury, disease or pain that could reduce their maximal effort
You may not qualify if:
- history of injury to the lower limbs (including the hamstrings), wrist, or back in the past 18 months
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Rodrigo Martin-San Agustin
Valencia, Spain
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Rodrigo Martín-San Agustín
University of Valencia
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor of Physiotherapy
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 27, 2024
First Posted
August 5, 2024
Study Start
September 1, 2019
Primary Completion
June 30, 2021
Study Completion
June 30, 2021
Last Updated
August 9, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share