BCAA vs. Rifaximin in Patients With Cirrhosis for Secondary Prophylaxis of HE
HERB
Branch Chain Amino Acids vs. Rifaximin in Patients With Cirrhosis for Secondary Prophylaxis of Hepatic Encephalopathy: Double-blind Placebo-controlled Multicentric Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
336
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Rationale
- Patients who recover from an episode of overt HE(OHE) are at risk of recurrent episodes of HE and persistent minimal hepatic encephalopathy, impacting their daily functioning and mental health.
- A multicentric pan-India team will evaluate the role of oral branched-chain amino acids (BCAA) vs Rifaximin as secondary prophylaxis following overt HE as compared with improvement in cognitive function. Novelty:
- This study is intended to investigate the role of BCAA vs rifaximin as the ideal second-line therapy for HE management, recurrence, and overall health, including cognitive function, depression and anxiety.
- The head-to-head comparison of BCAA+lactulose+ pill-placebo vs rifaximin+ lactulose+ powder-placebo ensures minimization of bias and has adequate power to determine rates of recurrence, Objectives:
- To assess the 1st breakthrough episode of HE during 6months in BCAA vs rifaximin groups as ideal secondary prophylaxis in HE. Methodology
- Double-blind placebo-controlled double-dummy randomized trial of BCAA supplementation vs rifaximin as the ideal second-line therapy in patients with cirrhosis who have recovered from an episode of OHE. Expected Outcome
- Ideal second line agent HE prophylaxis (rifaximin or BCAA) following 1st line lactulose is unclear in an Indian context where dysbiosis and sarcopenia are prevalent, and cost of therapy needs to be optimized.
- Optimal HE management prevents recurrence episodes of HE, and improves prognosis, neurocognitive function, and overall health-related quality of life(HRQOL).
- Creation of a management algorithm based deductive models incorporating etiology and severity of liver disease, cognitive performance, sarcopenia, and ammonia, and neuropsychiatric impact of using BCAA vs Rifaximin will be created.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_4
Started Feb 2025
Typical duration for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 23, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 5, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2027
June 10, 2025
June 1, 2025
1.5 years
April 23, 2024
June 5, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Number of breakthrough event of overt hepatic encephalopathy in BCAA vs rifaximin arm
Time to a breakthrough overt HE episode will be the duration (number of days) from time of first dose of study drug to the first breakthrough overt HE episode. The number of events of a first breakthrough overt HE episode during the treatment period will be assessed
24 Weeks
Secondary Outcomes (17)
Computerized Cognitive Test battery for Cognitive performance
At Enrolment
Computerized Cognitive Test battery for Cognitive performance
30 days
Computerized Cognitive Test battery for Cognitive performance
90 days
Psychiatric Assessment
0 days
Psychiatric Assessment
0 days
- +12 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
A1=Experimental:
EXPERIMENTALDrug: Oral BCAA + Rifaximin placebo + Lactulose ( Oral BCAA 15 gm in once daily dose With Lactulose for 12 weeks)
A2= Experimental:
EXPERIMENTALDrug: Rifaximin+ BCAA Placebo + Lactulose ( Oral Rifaximin 550 mg twice daily daily + Lactulose therapy for 12 weeks)
Interventions
The active drug BCAA supplement will be dispensed in a dose of 15 gm once daily x 12 weeks
Active drug rifaximin will be dispensed in a dose of 550mg twice daily x 12 weeks
Both groups will be treated with will be treated with 30-60 ml lactulose three times a day to ensure passage of 2-3 semisoft stools per day
A placebo comparator of 15 gm of skimmed milk powder will be used.
Identical placebo sugar pills will be used as a placebo.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Any gender
- Discharged from the hospital following an episode of overt hepatic encephalopathy.
- Participants able to give informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Subjects with active bacterial or fungal infection
- Subjects with active or very recent gastrointestinal bleeding in the last 2 weeks.
- Current overt hepatic encephalopathy, defined as grade II-IV hepatic encephalopathy according to the West-Haven classification.
- Conditions that can impact interpretation of cognitive function:
- i) Untreated viremic hepatitis C virus infection ii) Established neurological/degenerative disorders iii) Patient undergoing active alcohol withdrawal treatment Iv) Patient is intoxicated or under the influence of illicit drugs as per clinician assessment V) Treatment with antipsychotics or other psychotropic drugs with sedative effects
- Patients with active hepatocellular carcinoma or history of hepatocellular carcinoma that is in remission for less than six months.
- Patients with a history of significant extrahepatic disease with impaired short-term prognosis, including: i) Congestive heart failure New York Heart Association Grade III/IV or ejection fraction\<30% ii) COPD: GOLD \>2, ii) Chronic kidney disease with serum creatinine \>2mg/dL or under renal replacement therapy.
- Patients with current extra hepatic malignancies, including solid tumours and hematologic disorders.
- Patients with MELD\>20
- Patients with mental incapacity, or those unlikely to survive 12 weeks or any other reason considered by the investigator precluding adequate understanding, cooperation, or compliance in the study activities.
- Patients with TIPS shunt in situ
- Refusal or inability to give informed consent
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
PGIMER
Chandigarh, India
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Double-blind double dummy placebo-controlled multicentric randomized controlled trial
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 23, 2024
First Posted
August 5, 2024
Study Start
February 1, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
August 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
August 1, 2027
Last Updated
June 10, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share