Evaluation of a Perceptual Learning Module on Spinal Ultrasound Among Residents.
MAP-Rachis
Evaluation of the Impact of a Perceptual Learning Module (PLM) on the Sonographic Identification of Spinal Structures by Novice Anesthesiology Residents. A Randomized Controlled Study
1 other identifier
interventional
20
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This medical education research project aims to evaluate the impact of a directed perceptual learning module (PLM) on spinal sonoanatomy. Following a demographic questionnaire, participants will be exposed to a tutorial explaining the necessary theoretical foundations for the PLM as well as the functioning of the PLM interface. A pre-test involving selecting the best image from a video sequence depicting spinal sonoanatomy will be administered to all participants. Participants will then be randomized into two groups and exposed to video sequences in the same manner as during the pre-test, with immediate feedback in the intervention group and no feedback in the control group. The video sequences presented will be the same between the two groups. Finally, a post-test will be administered immediately and remotely after exposure to the PLM. The time window corresponding to the best image will be predefined by an expert and compared to the resident\'s value. The difference in feedback exposure between the two groups will not be revealed to limit biases.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2024
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 26, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 2, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 1, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2025
CompletedAugust 1, 2024
July 1, 2024
8 months
April 2, 2024
July 29, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Improvement in the concordance of identifying the best image on the video within the interval specified by the expert in seconds, between the pre-test and the post-test.
Between the pre-test and the immediate post-test, as well as the post-test at 1 month.
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Improvement over time in the concordance of identifying the best image on the video within the interval specified by the expert in seconds
During the intervention phase
Study Arms (2)
Feedback group
EXPERIMENTALThis group will receive feedback upon completion of the task.
Control group
PLACEBO COMPARATORThis group will not receive any feedback
Interventions
Perceptual learning module providing feedback on the most relevant image for clinical practice in a spinal ultrasound video.
Participants in the control group will view the same videos as participants in the intervention group without feedback on the best image.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- To be a first, second, third, or fourth-year resident in the anesthesiology program at the Université de Montréal.
- Not having experience in spinal ultrasound (defined as not having performed more than 5 spinal ultrasounds, whether accompanied or not).
- To be familiar with ultrasound.
- Consenting to participate in the study.
- \- Having used spinal ultrasound in clinical practice or taught it within the last year.
You may not qualify if:
- Refusal to consent
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital
Montreal, Quebec, H1T 2M4, Canada
Related Publications (9)
Guegan S, Steichen O, Soria A. Literature review of perceptual learning modules in medical education: What can we conclude regarding dermatology? Ann Dermatol Venereol. 2021 Mar;148(1):16-22. doi: 10.1016/j.annder.2020.01.023. Epub 2020 Jul 9.
PMID: 32654795RESULTKellman PJ, Krasne S. Accelerating expertise: Perceptual and adaptive learning technology in medical learning. Med Teach. 2018 Aug;40(8):797-802. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2018.1484897. Epub 2018 Aug 9.
PMID: 30091650RESULTVanderWielen BA, Harris R, Galgon RE, VanderWielen LM, Schroeder KM. Teaching sonoanatomy to anesthesia faculty and residents: utility of hands-on gel phantom and instructional video training models. J Clin Anesth. 2015 May;27(3):188-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2014.07.007. Epub 2014 Nov 27.
PMID: 25433727RESULTDeacon AJ, Melhuishi NS, Terblanche NC. CUSUM method for construction of trainee spinal ultrasound learning curves following standardised teaching. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2014 Jul;42(4):480-6. doi: 10.1177/0310057X1404200409.
PMID: 24967763RESULTWatson MJ, Evans S, Thorp JM. Could ultrasonography be used by an anaesthetist to identify a specified lumbar interspace before spinal anaesthesia? Br J Anaesth. 2003 Apr;90(4):509-11. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeg096.
PMID: 12644427RESULTRamlogan R, Niazi AU, Jin R, Johnson J, Chan VW, Perlas A. A Virtual Reality Simulation Model of Spinal Ultrasound: Role in Teaching Spinal Sonoanatomy. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2017 Mar/Apr;42(2):217-222. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000537.
PMID: 28045758RESULTChin KJ, Perlas A. Ultrasonography of the lumbar spine for neuraxial and lumbar plexus blocks. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2011 Oct;24(5):567-72. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0b013e32834aa234.
PMID: 21822134RESULTMargarido CB, Arzola C, Balki M, Carvalho JC. Anesthesiologists' learning curves for ultrasound assessment of the lumbar spine. Can J Anaesth. 2010 Feb;57(2):120-6. doi: 10.1007/s12630-009-9219-2. Epub 2009 Dec 30.
PMID: 20041358RESULTSidiropoulou T, Christodoulaki K, Siristatidis C. Pre-Procedural Lumbar Neuraxial Ultrasound-A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials and Meta-Analysis. Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Apr 17;9(4):479. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9040479.
PMID: 33920621RESULT
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD, MA (Ed), DESAR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 2, 2024
First Posted
August 1, 2024
Study Start
March 26, 2024
Primary Completion
December 1, 2024
Study Completion
April 1, 2025
Last Updated
August 1, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-07