Real-world Experience With Lutetium Vipivotide Tetraxetan in Metastatic Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer
1 other identifier
observational
500
1 country
36
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to describe routine clinical practice with lutetium (177Lu) vipivotide tetraxetan on Health related quality of life (HRQoL) at baseline, on treatment, and post progression.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Sep 2024
Typical duration for all trials
36 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 18, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 24, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 4, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2028
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2028
April 13, 2026
April 1, 2026
3.4 years
July 18, 2024
April 7, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (14)
Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Prostate (FACT-P)
FACT-P assesses symptoms/problems related to prostate carcinoma and its treatment. It is a combination of the FACT- General + the Prostate Cancer Subscale (PCS). The FACTGeneral (FACT-G) is a 27 item Quality of Life (QoL) measure that provides a total score as well as subscale scores: Physical (0-28), Functional (0-28), Social (0-28), and Emotional Well-being (0-24). The total score range is between 1-108, higher scores indicates better for total score and subscale scores. PCS is a 12-item prostate cancer subscale that asks about symptoms and problems specific to prostate cancer (Range 0-48, higher scores better). The FACT-P total score is the sum of all 5 subscale scores of the FACT-P questionnaire and ranges from 0-156. Higher scores indicate higher degree of functioning and better quality of life.
Baseline, up to 1 year after end of treatment
Change from baseline in FACT-P
FACT-P assesses symptoms/problems related to prostate carcinoma and its treatment. It is a combination of the FACT- General + the Prostate Cancer Subscale (PCS). The FACTGeneral (FACT-G) is a 27 item Quality of Life (QoL) measure that provides a total score as well as subscale scores: Physical (0-28), Functional (0-28), Social (0-28), and Emotional Well-being (0-24). The total score range is between 1-108, higher scores indicates better for total score and subscale scores. PCS is a 12-item prostate cancer subscale that asks about symptoms and problems specific to prostate cancer (Range 0-48, higher scores better). The FACT-P total score is the sum of all 5 subscale scores of the FACT-P questionnaire and ranges from 0-156. Higher scores indicate higher degree of functioning and better quality of life.
Baseline, up to 1 year after end of treatment
Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Radionuclid Therapy (FACT-RNT)
The FACT-RNT (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Radionuclide Therapy) is a Patient Reported Outcomes (PRO) new measure developed using FACIT specific questions (items), selected from FACIT item bank, to assess treatment-related symptoms of special interest associated with radioligand therapies. The FACT-RNT contains items assessing dry mouth, dry eyes, vomiting, diarrhea, constipation, loss of appetite, fatigue, impact of fatigue, bone pain, and isolation due to illness or treatment. FACT-RNT score range 0 to 60, with higher score indicating better quality of life.
Baseline, up to 1 year after end of treatment
Change from baseline in FACT-RNT
The FACT-RNT (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Radionuclide Therapy) is a Patient Reported Outcomes (PRO) new measure developed using FACIT specific questions (items), selected from FACIT item bank, to assess treatment-related symptoms of special interest associated with radioligand therapies. The FACT-RNT contains items assessing dry mouth, dry eyes, vomiting, diarrhea, constipation, loss of appetite, fatigue, impact of fatigue, bone pain, and isolation due to illness or treatment. FACT-RNT score range 0 to 60, with higher score indicating better quality of life.
Baseline, up to 1 year after end of treatment
Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF)
The BPI-SF is a publicly available instrument to assess the pain and includes severity and interference scores. BPI-SF is an 11-item selfreport questionnaire that is designed to assess the severity and impact of pain on daily functions of a participant. Pain severity score is a mean value for BPI-SF questions 3, 4, 5 and 6 (questions inquiring about the extent of pain, where the extent is ranked from 0 \[no pain\] to 10 \[pain as bad as you can imagine\]). Pain severity progression is defined as an increase in score of 30% or greater from baseline without decrease in analgesic use
Baseline, up to 1 year after end of treatment
Change from baseline in BPI-SF
The BPI-SF is a publicly available instrument to assess the pain and includes severity and interference scores. BPI-SF is an 11-item selfreport questionnaire that is designed to assess the severity and impact of pain on daily functions of a participant. Pain severity score is a mean value for BPI-SF questions 3, 4, 5 and 6 (questions inquiring about the extent of pain, where the extent is ranked from 0 \[no pain\] to 10 \[pain as bad as you can imagine\]). Pain severity progression is defined as an increase in score of 30% or greater from baseline without decrease in analgesic use
Baseline, up to 1 year after end of treatment
Radiographic progression
Radiographic progression is measured with radiographic imaging (e.g. CT with contrast/MRI, bone scan, PET/CT, SPECT/CT) according to RECIST/PCWG3
Up to 1 year after end of treatment
Clinical progression
Unequivocal clinical progression (UCP) is considered a worsening of clinical status with or without radiographic progression (RAD): escalation in cancer related-pain, immediate need for initiation of new anticancer treatment, surgical, or radiological intervention, deterioration in ECOG to grade 3 or higher, in the opinion of investigator
Up to 1 year after end of treatment
Time to prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression
Time to PSA progression is defined as time from randomization to first PSA progression. PSA progression is defined as the date that a ≥ 25% increase in PSA and an absolute increase of 2 ng/mL or more from the nadir or baseline is documented and confirmed by a second consecutive value obtained 3 or more weeks later. Rises in PSA within the first 12 weeks will be ignored in the absence of other evidence of disease progression (adapted from Prostate Cancer Working Group (PCWG3) Guidance).
Up to 1 year after end of treatment
Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) 30/50/90
Response rates are defined as the proportion of patients who have a ≥30%/50%/90% decrease in PSA from baseline that is confirmed by a second PSA measurement.
Up to 1 year after end of treatment
Progression-free survival (PFS)
PFS, defined as the time from initial treatment to the first documented disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first.
Up to 1 year after end of treatment
Progression-free survival 2 (PFS2)
PFS2, defined as time from initial treatment to the first documented disease progression or death under the treatment after lutetium (177Lu) vipivotide tetraxetan.
Up to 1 year after end of treatment
Overall Survival (OS)
OS defined as the time from initial treatment until death from any cause.
Up to 1 year after end of treatment
Time to initiation of pain medication
Time to initiation of pain medication is defined as time from index date to the first use of any pain medication or progression.
Up to 1 year after end of treatment
Study Arms (1)
Lutetium (177Lu) vipivotide tetraxetan
Patients with mCRPC initiating lutetium (177Lu) vipivotide tetraxetan
Interventions
This is an observational study. There is no treatment allocation. The decision to initiate lutetium vipivotide tetraxetan will be based solely on clinical judgement.
Eligibility Criteria
Adult male patients with mCRPC
You may qualify if:
- Adult male patients diagnosed with mCRPC and initiating lutetium (177Lu) vipivotide tetraxetan by treating physician as per local label. After treatment decision enrollment is allowed before date of cycle 1 or within 2 weeks after the date of Cycle 1.
- ≥ 18 years old at the time of enrollment
- Written informed consent must be obtained prior to any data collection
- Willing to participate in Quality of Life post treatment date collection for 1 year
You may not qualify if:
- \- Simultaneous participation in any investigational trial or simultaneous participation in another Novartis-sponsored non-interventional study with lutetium (177Lu) vipivotide tetraxetan
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (36)
Novartis Investigative Site
Konstanz, Baden-Wurttemberg, 78464, Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Stuttgart, Baden-Wurttemberg, 70174, Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Munich, Bavaria, 81377, Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Regensburg, Bavaria, 93053, Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Würzburg, Bavaria, 97080, Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Cottbus, Brandenburg, 03048, Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Frankfurt (Oder), Brandenburg, 15236, Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Ludwigshafen, Germany, 67063, Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Marburg, Hesse, 35043, Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Cologne, North Rhine-Westphalia, 50937, Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Dresden, Saxony, 01307, Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Leipzig, Saxony, 04103, Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Halle, Saxony-Anhalt, 06120, Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Jena, Thuringia, 07740, Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Aachen, 52074, Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Augsburg, 86179, Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Berlin, 10249, Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Berlin, 12559, Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Berlin, 13125, Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Bielefeld, 33611, Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Bonn, 53105, Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Chemnitz, 09113, Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Dortmund, 44137, Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Dortmund, 44309, Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Erlangen, 91054, Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Essen, 45147, Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Fulda, 36043, Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Herford, 32049, Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Homburg, 66421, Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Magdeburg, 39120, Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Mainz, 55131, Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Nuremberg, 90419, Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Rostock, 18057, Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Trier, 54290, Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Tübingen, 72076, Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Ulm, 89081, Germany
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Central Study Contacts
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
CONTACT
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 18, 2024
First Posted
July 24, 2024
Study Start
September 4, 2024
Primary Completion (Estimated)
February 1, 2028
Study Completion (Estimated)
February 1, 2028
Last Updated
April 13, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share