NCT06505616

Brief Summary

Prospective, multicenter, randomized, crossover, non-masked study to evaluate the impact on the thrombogenicity of the haemodialysis circuit by comparing synthetic haemodialysers against the ATA membrane of the Solacea™.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
32

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2022

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 17, 2022

Completed
24 days until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 10, 2022

Completed
1.3 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 20, 2023

Completed
1 year until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 5, 2024

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 17, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

July 17, 2024

Status Verified

July 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

24 days

First QC Date

June 5, 2024

Last Update Submit

July 10, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

anticoagulationheparinbiocompatibilityhaemodialysishaemodiafiltrationhaemodialyser

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Impact on the thrombogenicity of the haemodialysis circuit by comparing dialyzers

    The investigators measure the impact of Solacea membrane on the thrombogenicity of the haemodialysis circuit compared to other high-permeability synthetic dialysers commonly used in clinical practice. Heparin was progressively reduced until it was discontinued. After each session, investigators carried out a visual inspection of the venous chamber and the haemodialyser and assigned a coagulation score. In 8 patients also a scanning technique was carried out.

    four weeks, carried out in two phases

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Effect of heparin reduction or discontinuation

    four weeks, carried out in two phases

Study Arms (2)

Asymmetric cellulose triacetate (ATA™) membrane (Solacea™, Nipro, Osaka, Japan)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Patients were dialyzed with an asymmetric cellulose triacetate (ATA™) membrane (Solacea™, Nipro, Osaka, Japan). Non synthetic membrane, cellulose membrane.

Device: Compared the trombogenicity of the Solacea dialyzer with synthetic dialyzers after progressively decreasing heparin until discontinuing it

Synthetic haemodialysers membranes

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Synthetic haemodialysis membranes habitual used in the hospitals included in the study: FXCorDiax 800™ (Fresenius MC),Polyflux 210H™ (Baxter),Revaclear 400™ (Baxter),Eliseo 19H™ (Nipro)

Device: Compared the trombogenicity of the Solacea dialyzer with synthetic dialyzers after progressively decreasing heparin until discontinuing it

Interventions

The duration of the study was four weeks, carried out in two phases. After screening, patients were randomized to be dialyzed with the Solacea™ hemodialyzer versus the usual hemodialyzer, which in all cases had to be a synthetic membrane. In both arms, heparin was progressively decreased until it was discontinued. Afterwards the patients were crossed over to the other arm.

Asymmetric cellulose triacetate (ATA™) membrane (Solacea™, Nipro, Osaka, Japan)Synthetic haemodialysers membranes

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients over 18 years of age.
  • Patients in a chronic haemodialysis program who had been on dialysis for more than three months were included.
  • Patients provided informed consent.

You may not qualify if:

  • allergies to synthetic membranes
  • allergies to heparin
  • patients receiving anticoagulant treatment
  • women Pregnant
  • breastfeeding
  • patients with cognitive impairment

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Hospital Universitario Infanta Leonor

Madrid, 28031, Spain

Location

Related Publications (12)

  • Claudel SE, Miles LA, Murea M. Anticoagulation in hemodialysis: A narrative review. Semin Dial. 2021 Mar;34(2):103-115. doi: 10.1111/sdi.12932. Epub 2020 Nov 1.

  • Davenport A. What are the anticoagulation options for intermittent hemodialysis? Nat Rev Nephrol. 2011 Jul 5;7(9):499-508. doi: 10.1038/nrneph.2011.88.

  • Sahota S, Rodby R. Inpatient hemodialysis without anticoagulation in adults. Clin Kidney J. 2014 Dec;7(6):552-6. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfu114. Epub 2014 Oct 30.

  • Guery B, Alberti C, Servais A, Harrami E, Bererhi L, Zins B, Touam M, Joly D. Hemodialysis without systemic anticoagulation: a prospective randomized trial to evaluate 3 strategies in patients at risk of bleeding. PLoS One. 2014 May 13;9(5):e97187. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0097187. eCollection 2014.

  • Nakornchai P, Jitraree A, Homjan MC, Laykhram T, Trakarnvanich T. Comparison of citrate dialysate in pre- and post-dilution online hemodiafiltration: effect on clot formation and adequacy of dialysis in hemodialysis patients. Ren Fail. 2024 Dec;46(1):2302109. doi: 10.1080/0886022X.2024.2302109. Epub 2024 Jan 8.

  • Laville M, Dorval M, Fort Ros J, Fay R, Cridlig J, Nortier JL, Juillard L, Debska-Slizien A, Fernandez Lorente L, Thibaudin D, Franssen C, Schulz M, Moureau F, Loughraieb N, Rossignol P. Results of the HepZero study comparing heparin-grafted membrane and standard care show that heparin-grafted dialyzer is safe and easy to use for heparin-free dialysis. Kidney Int. 2014 Dec;86(6):1260-7. doi: 10.1038/ki.2014.225. Epub 2014 Jul 9.

  • Bramham K, Varrier M, Asgari E, Makanjuola D. Comparison of Tinzaparin and unfractionated heparin as anticoagulation on haemodialysis: equal safety, efficacy and economical parity. Nephron Clin Pract. 2008;110(2):c107-13. doi: 10.1159/000158561. Epub 2008 Sep 30.

  • Maduell F, Moreso F, Pons M, Ramos R, Mora-Macia J, Carreras J, Soler J, Torres F, Campistol JM, Martinez-Castelao A; ESHOL Study Group. High-efficiency postdilution online hemodiafiltration reduces all-cause mortality in hemodialysis patients. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2013 Feb;24(3):487-97. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2012080875. Epub 2013 Feb 14.

  • Blankestijn PJ, Vernooij RWM, Hockham C, Strippoli GFM, Canaud B, Hegbrant J, Barth C, Covic A, Cromm K, Cucui A, Davenport A, Rose M, Torok M, Woodward M, Bots ML; CONVINCE Scientific Committee Investigators. Effect of Hemodiafiltration or Hemodialysis on Mortality in Kidney Failure. N Engl J Med. 2023 Aug 24;389(8):700-709. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2304820. Epub 2023 Jun 16.

  • Sombolos KI, Fragia TK, Gionanlis LC, Veneti PE, Bamichas GI, Fragidis SK, Georgoulis IE, Natse TA. The anticoagulant activity of enoxaparin sodium during on-line hemodiafiltration and conventional hemodialysis. Hemodial Int. 2009 Jan;13(1):43-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1542-4758.2009.00336.x.

  • Vanommeslaeghe F, Josipovic I, Boone M, Dhondt A, Van Biesen W, Eloot S. A randomized cross-over study with objective quantification of the performance of an asymmetric triacetate and a polysulfone dialysis membrane using different anticoagulation strategies. Clin Kidney J. 2019 Dec 22;14(1):398-407. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfz163. eCollection 2021 Jan.

  • Puerta M, Jaldo MT, Munoz P, Martinez-Miguel P, Maduell F, Lancho C, Garcia-Herrera AL, Eloot S, de Sequera P. SOLFA study: a multicenter, open-label, prospective, randomized study to investigate the clotting propensity of asymmetric cellulose triacetate membrane compared to synthetic membranes in on line HDF. J Nephrol. 2025 Mar;38(2):697-705. doi: 10.1007/s40620-024-02197-y. Epub 2025 Jan 19.

Study Officials

  • Marta Puerta, MD

    University Hospital Infanta Leonor

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Model Details: prospective, multicenter, randomized, crossover, non-masked study
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 5, 2024

First Posted

July 17, 2024

Study Start

January 17, 2022

Primary Completion

February 10, 2022

Study Completion

May 20, 2023

Last Updated

July 17, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-07

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations