I4F: Isla for Frailty Feasibility Study
I4F
Acceptability, Feasibility, and Potential Effectiveness of Video-based Patient Records for Supporting Care Delivery for Older People With Frailty.
1 other identifier
observational
95
1 country
1
Brief Summary
BACKGROUND: Older patients with frailty have complex support needs. How they manage with daily tasks such as eating and drinking, mobilising, communicating their preferences, and the level of support they need, can vary on a day-to-day basis. They are at risk of rapid loss of functional independence when they are acutely unwell. When older people need input from multiple different professionals, ineffective communication is sadly very common. This leads to disjointed care, and patients becoming frailer and suffering avoidable health complications. One of the problems is that it can be difficult for healthcare professionals to build up a complete picture of a patient from brief verbal handovers and written information in medical records. It is believed that video-recordings capturing the changing functional abilities and support needs of individual patients could improve care-provider communication and support for older people. Smartphones with cameras are now a part of everyday life, and people often tell their stories using photographs and videos. However, video recording patients during care delivery is not commonplace. It is not know how patients and carers feel about being video recorded or whether video recordings improve care. AIM: To explore the perspectives of frail older patients, carers, and clinical staff around video recording during routine clinical care, and to understand how patient videos could impact on communication and care delivery across care transitions. METHODS: The study team will recruit frail, older inpatients, their carers, and clinical staff from a Medicine for the Elderly ward. Over three months, doctors, nurses, and therapists will securely record and view patient videos alongside providing usual care. Videos will capture patients' functional abilities and support needs to inform ongoing assessment and care delivery. The investigators will collect information from patients/ carers/ doctors/ nurses /therapists about their experiences of the video recording intervention through interviews and questionnaires.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Feb 2024
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 14, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 10, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 17, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 31, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 30, 2024
CompletedJuly 18, 2024
July 1, 2024
6 months
July 10, 2024
July 16, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (6)
Intervention acceptability [1]
Patient and carer perspectives on the acceptability of video-based records will be assessed within this mixed-methods feasibility study and process evaluation multiple measures: \[a\] Proportion of eligible participants declining enrolment and reasons for non-participation (% declining, descriptive statistics)
Within three-month pilot phase
Intervention acceptability [2]
Patient perspectives on the acceptability of video-based records will be assessed within this mixed-methods feasibility study and process evaluation multiple measures: \[b\] Proportion of enrolled patients with ≥ 1 video linked to the electronic patient record (% with at least one video linked to electronic patient record, descriptive statistics)
Within three-month pilot phase
Intervention acceptability [3]
Patient and carer perspectives on the acceptability of video-based records will be assessed within this mixed-methods feasibility study and process evaluation multiple measures: \[c\] Semi-structured interview at or within 2 weeks of discharge (Framework analysis to understand patient and carer views on acceptability)
At or within two weeks of patient discharge
Intervention acceptability [4]
Ward team perspectives on the acceptability of video-based records will be assessed within this mixed-methods feasibility study and process evaluation multiple measures: \[a\] Video evaluation questionnaire (a combination of stuctured and open-ended questions asking ward team to appraise whether video quality is suitable for clinical interpretation: Yes/No/To some extent; Video length: Too long/Too short/Just right, Whether ward team want to see more patient videos in the future: Yes/No - descriptive statistics. Open-ended questions ask ward team to explain their answers)
Within three-month pilot phase
Intervention acceptability [5]
Ward team perspectives on the acceptability of video-based records will be assessed within this mixed-methods feasibility study and process evaluation multiple measures: \[b\] Semi-structured interview after the three-month pilot (Framework analysis to understand ward team views on acceptability)
Ward staff interviews to be conducted within two months after three-month pilot phase
Intervention acceptability [6]
Ward team perspectives on the acceptability of video-based records will be assessed within this mixed-methods feasibility study and process evaluation multiple measures: \[c\] Number of videos requested, attempted \& submitted (Quantitative, descriptive statistics)
Within three-month pilot phase
Secondary Outcomes (10)
Intervention feasibility - Patient enrolment [1]
Within three-month pilot phase
Intervention feasibility - Patient enrolment [2]
Within three-month pilot phase
Intervention feasibility - Intervention barriers and facilitators [1]
At or within two weeks of patient discharge
Intervention feasibility - Intervention barriers and facilitators [2]
Ward staff interviews to be conducted within two months after three-month pilot phase
Intervention feasibility - Use of the Isla platform [1]
Within three-month pilot phase
- +5 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
Patients
Up to 30 adults, aged 65 years or older, who are frail or pre-frail, and who are admitted as an inpatient to an acute Medicine for the Elderly ward during a three-month pilot phase Intervention: Isla for Frailty - video-based patient records. Isla is a technology company providing a visual patient record platform. The platform allows anyone involved in a patient's care to capture and review visual data (photographs, videos) relating to a patient's health. The platform is web-based (a "progressive web application") and supports secure capture of visual data with encrypted storage in the cloud. Isla interfaces with Electronic Health Record (EHR) systems including Cerner, enabling health professionals to view data held on Isla's servers from within the electronic patient record, via the 'Cerner Red Button'. Health professionals can also view a patient's visual record through a secure weblink requiring an NHS email address and password.
Carers
Carers of enrolled patients, who are in receipt of the Isla for Frailty intervention (described above) Carers are those who provide the enrolled patient with assistance in their daily activities and are unpaid for these caring activities. A carer may be a member of the patient's family, a friend, or other person who provides the patient with unpaid care.
Ward team
Clinical staff working on one of three Medicine for the Elderly wards at St Mary's Hospital, where the Isla for Frailty intervention (described above) will be subject to a feasibility trial. Clinical staff must work regular shifts on the ward during study initiation and pilot phases.
Interventions
Isla for Frailty - video-based patient records. Isla is a technology company providing a visual patient record platform. The platform allows anyone involved in a patient's care to capture and review visual data (photographs, videos) relating to a patient's health. The platform is web-based (a "progressive web application") and supports secure capture of visual data with encrypted storage in the cloud. Isla interfaces with Electronic Health Record (EHR) systems including Cerner, enabling health professionals to view data held on Isla's servers from within the electronic patient record, via the 'Cerner Red Button'. Health professionals can also view a patient's visual record through a secure weblink requiring an NHS email address and password.
Eligibility Criteria
Patients: Adults, aged 65 years or older, who are frail or pre-frail, and who are admitted as an inpatient to an acute Medicine for the Elderly ward during a three-month pilot phase Carers: Carers of enrolled patients, who provide the enrolled patient with assistance in their daily activities and are unpaid for these caring activities. A carer may be a member of the patient's family, a friend, or other person who provides the patient with unpaid care Ward team: Clinical staff working on one of three Medicine for the Elderly wards at St Mary's Hospital, where the Isla for Frailty intervention (described above) will be subject to a feasibility trial
You may qualify if:
- Admitted as an inpatient to an acute Medicine for the Elderly ward at St Mary's Hospital during a 3-month pilot phase of Isla's visual record platform
- Aged ≥65 years old
- Are considered to be frail or pre-frail by the direct care team
- Have capacity to consent to study participation OR lack capacity to consent on the condition that a 'personal consultee' is available to advise on the patient's likely wishes and feelings about taking part.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients who lack capacity to consent will be excluded if a personal consultee is not available to advise on the patients' likely wishes or feelings about taking part.
- Carers.
- Aged ≥18 years
- Provide the patient/care-recipient with assistance in their daily activities and are unpaid for these caring activities
- Are willing to participate in an interview as part of the study
- A carer may be a member of the patient's family, a friend, or other person who provides the patient with unpaid care
- \- Carers will be excluded if the patient/care-recipient declined to participate in the study
- Ward team.
- Clinical staff working on an acute Medicine for the Elderly ward at St Mary's Hospital.
- Staff must be working regular shifts on the ward during study initiation and pilot phases
- Staff must have an active nhs.net account.
- Ad-hoc bank/agency staff
- Permanent staff on long-term leave (e.g. sick/maternity) during the pilot
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Imperial College Londonlead
- Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trustcollaborator
- National Institute for Health Research, United Kingdomcollaborator
- Health Education England, Wessexcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
St Mary's Hospital
London, W2 1NY, United Kingdom
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Phoebe Averill, PhD
Imperial College London
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE ONLY
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 10, 2024
First Posted
July 17, 2024
Study Start
February 14, 2024
Primary Completion
July 31, 2024
Study Completion
September 30, 2024
Last Updated
July 18, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share