Study Stopped
COVID 19 caused delays for this project and is unlikely to be revisited.
Comparing Frailty Care Pathways in Rural Primary Care: a Feasibility Study
1 other identifier
interventional
N/A
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Primary Care General Practitioners (GPs) are always looking at ways to improve the care of older people and ways to prevent older people from losing their independence. Pro-active provision of support often involves lifestyle advice and is a potentially important aspect of that, as it supports older people before acute care is needed. It's preventative caring, rather than reactive caring. But, implementing pro-active care is hampered by the high current workload of acute care, the uncertainty of 'what works' and whether patients are responsive to pro-active care plans. This project will explore different ways of providing pro-active support to older people who could be at risk of losing their independence and requiring frequent acute care. The benefits of pro-active care are arguably the greatest in these individuals.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
Started Sep 2021
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 31, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 30, 2022
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 28, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 9, 2023
CompletedMay 9, 2023
July 1, 2020
5 months
April 28, 2023
April 28, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Recruitment rate (feasibility determination)
The recruitment rate reflects the recruitment method and number of eligible patients and general interest to take part.
6 months
Drop out rate (feasibility determination)
The drop out rate reflects the number of participants lost to follow up, response rates and adherence/compliance to the intervention.
12 months
Frequency of health care use
The number of hospital admissions and GP visits in the preceding 12 months
12 months
electronic Frailty Index
This score reflects the number of accumulated deficits
12 months
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Physical Activity Level
12 months
Usual Walking Speed
12 months
Grip Strength
12 months
Study Arms (5)
Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA)
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants in this arm will undertake a Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment, and will be implemented based on Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment Toolkit for Primary Care Practitioners from the British Geriatrics Society. A personalised action plan will be developed and implemented based on the CGA.
Integrated Care for Older PEople (ICOPE)
EXPERIMENTALParticipants in this arm will undertake the assessment recommended by the World Health Organisation, and will be implemented by the publicly available app. A personalised action plan will be developed and implemented based on the ICOPE.
Identification and Management of frailty and sarcopenia
EXPERIMENTALParticipants in this arm will undertake the assessment recommended by the International Conference on Frailty and Sarcopenia Research Clinical Practice Guidelines for Identification and Management of physical frailty (ICFSR). A personalised action plan will be developed and implemented based on the ICFSR.
Functional Fitness Battery (FFB)
EXPERIMENTALParticipants in this arm will undertake a Functional Fitness Battery, comprising physical assessments on the intrinsic capacity, lifestyle and nutritional status
Usual Care
NO INTERVENTIONParticipants in this arm will not receive an intervention, but the usual care provided by the primary care provider.
Interventions
This intervention will take place in different primary care providers in a rural environment. Each provider will have one intervention and a no-intervention group, which will be part of the feasibility evaluation. The intervention will comprise a consultation with the participant, based on the different approaches described in the arm descriptions.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- adults aged 60 years or older
- mild frailty or frailty based on the eFI,
- without severe cognitive impairment diagnoses,
- not currently taking part in other research or in the previous 6 months,
- willing to provide informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- are terminally ill
- have severe cognitive or psychological impairments,
- have experienced a severe, disabling stroke within the previous 6 months
- are unable to communicate in English.
- are currently taking part in other research project, or was part of research in the previous 6 months.
- have experienced a heart attack, or unstable angina within the previous 3 months.
- already receive advice that includes exercise and diet by health professionals and were referred at discharge for condition-specific rehabilitation (e.g. pulmonary rehabilitation, stroke rehabilitation) within the previous 6 months
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Aberystwyth University
Aberystwyth, Ceredigion, SY23 3FD, United Kingdom
Related Publications (2)
Dent E, Morley JE, Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Woodhouse L, Rodriguez-Manas L, Fried LP, Woo J, Aprahamian I, Sanford A, Lundy J, Landi F, Beilby J, Martin FC, Bauer JM, Ferrucci L, Merchant RA, Dong B, Arai H, Hoogendijk EO, Won CW, Abbatecola A, Cederholm T, Strandberg T, Gutierrez Robledo LM, Flicker L, Bhasin S, Aubertin-Leheudre M, Bischoff-Ferrari HA, Guralnik JM, Muscedere J, Pahor M, Ruiz J, Negm AM, Reginster JY, Waters DL, Vellas B. Physical Frailty: ICFSR International Clinical Practice Guidelines for Identification and Management. J Nutr Health Aging. 2019;23(9):771-787. doi: 10.1007/s12603-019-1273-z.
PMID: 31641726BACKGROUNDde Jong LD, Peters A, Hooper J, Chalmers N, Henderson C, Laventure RM, Skelton DA. The Functional Fitness MOT Test Battery for Older Adults: Protocol for a Mixed-Method Feasibility Study. JMIR Res Protoc. 2016 Jun 20;5(2):e108. doi: 10.2196/resprot.5682.
PMID: 27324114BACKGROUND
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Marco Arkesteijn, PhD
Aberystwyth University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- There will be different people assigned to the delivery and the intervention. The effectiveness of this will be established as part of the feasibility evaluation.
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 28, 2023
First Posted
May 9, 2023
Study Start
September 1, 2021
Primary Completion
January 31, 2022
Study Completion
May 30, 2022
Last Updated
May 9, 2023
Record last verified: 2020-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, CSR
- Time Frame
- By december 2022, final data set will be made available comprising the primary and secondary outcome variables, potential other variables collected as part of the intervention arms.
The project data will be made public via the Open Science Framework. This will include all IPD that underlie results in a publication