High Versus Lower Intensity Surveillance Following Resection of Retroperitoneal Sarcoma
SARveillance
An International, Partially-randomised, Patient-preference Trial Within a Registry of High Versus Lower Intensity Radiological Surveillance Following Primary Resection of Retroperitoneal, Abdominal and Pelvic Soft Tissue Sarcoma
1 other identifier
interventional
584
2 countries
2
Brief Summary
The SARveillance trial is an efficient, pragmatic, multi-centre, international, stratified, partially-randomised, patient-preference trial within a registry of high versus lower intensity radiological surveillance following primary resection of retroperitoneal, abdominal and pelvic soft tissue sarcoma. The trial design is stratified by sarcoma tumour grade (high/intermediate grade and low grade).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_3
Started Nov 2024
Longer than P75 for phase_3
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 24, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 28, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2033
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2033
October 16, 2024
June 1, 2024
9.1 years
June 24, 2024
October 14, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Emotional Functioning
Quality of life, assessed using Emotional Functioning domain (items 21-24) of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life questionnaire (QLQ-C30). Each of the four items for this functional domain are scored between 1 and 4 (range: 3) to a total of 16 points, scaled to a total out of 100 using a validated formula from the EORTC scoring manual.
5 years
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Overall survival
5 years
Cancer worry scale
5 years
Health utility
5 years
Other Outcomes (1)
Disease free survival
5 years
Study Arms (2)
High-intensity radiological surveillance
EXPERIMENTALHigh/intermediate grade histology: 3-4 monthly CT scan up to 2-years postoperatively, 6-monthly CT scan from 2-5 years postoperatively (schedule 1) Low grade histology: 6-monthly CT scan up to 2-years postoperatively, annual CT scan from 2-5 years postoperatively (schedule 2)
Lower-intensity radiological surveillance
ACTIVE COMPARATORHigh intermediate grade histology: 6-monthly CT scan up to 2-years postoperatively, annual CT scan from 2-5 years postoperatively (schedule 2) Low grade histology: Annual CT scan up to 2-years postoperatively, 18 monthly CT scan from 2-5 years postoperatively (schedule 3)
Interventions
The standard approach to surveillance imaging will be contrasted CT (IV and oral contrast) of the chest, abdomen and pelvis. All patients require radiological assessment of the chest, abdomen and pelvis at each surveillance round. Tolerance will be given in the protocol for selected patients where CT is not suitable to receive alternative imaging such as MRI or combination of MRI and CT. Uncontrasted CT imaging is permissible where renal toxicity or allergy from intravenous contrast is of concern. The use of plain radiography is not permitted as an alternative to CT imaging of the chest.
The standard approach to surveillance imaging will be contrasted CT (IV and oral contrast) of the chest, abdomen and pelvis. All patients require radiological assessment of the chest, abdomen and pelvis at each surveillance round. Tolerance will be given in the protocol for selected patients where CT is not suitable to receive alternative imaging such as MRI or combination of MRI and CT. Uncontrasted CT imaging is permissible where renal toxicity or allergy from intravenous contrast is of concern. The use of plain radiography is not permitted as an alternative to CT imaging of the chest.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adult patients (greater than 18 years)
- Primary resection
- Histologically confirmed retroperitoneal, abdominal or pelvic soft tissue sarcoma
- R0/R1 resection
- Eligible whether or not the participant undergoes neoadjuvant treatment
You may not qualify if:
- Metastatic disease at time of randomisation
- Recurrent, metastatic or residual disease identified on baseline CT imaging (3-4 months post primary resection)
- Reoperation for recurrent soft tissue sarcoma
- Re-resection following previous inadequate surgery
- R2 resection
- Patients receiving adjuvant therapy that will delay, interrupt or render radiological surveillance unpredictable
- Uterine sarcomas, gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST), fibromatosis, epithelial tumours, multifocal disease, sarcomas of bony origin
- Patient declined to consent to data sharing with RESAR (unless in a centre contributing via pre-planned IPDMA)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milanolead
- University of Birminghamcollaborator
- University Hospital Birmingham NHS Foundation Trustcollaborator
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trustcollaborator
- University Hospital Padovacollaborator
- Campus Bio-Medico Universitycollaborator
- The Netherlands Cancer Institutecollaborator
- KU Leuvencollaborator
- Heidelberg Universitycollaborator
- Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Centercollaborator
- Emory Universitycollaborator
- Mayo Cliniccollaborator
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center/University of Washington Cancer Consortiumcollaborator
- The Cleveland Cliniccollaborator
- M.D. Anderson Cancer Centercollaborator
- University of Southern Californiacollaborator
- Ohio State Universitycollaborator
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institutecollaborator
- McGill Universitycollaborator
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Australiacollaborator
- Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australiacollaborator
Study Sites (2)
Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori
Milan, Lombardy, 20133, Italy
University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust
Birmingham, West Midlands, B15 2GW, United Kingdom
Related Publications (1)
Baia M, Ford SJ, Dumitra S, Sama L, Naumann DN, Spolverato G, Callegaro D. Follow-up of patients with retroperitoneal sarcoma. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2023 Jun;49(6):1125-1132. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2022.02.016. Epub 2022 Mar 4.
PMID: 35277304BACKGROUND
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Samuel Ford, PhD
samuel.ford@uhb.nhs.uk
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 24, 2024
First Posted
June 28, 2024
Study Start
November 1, 2024
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2033
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2033
Last Updated
October 16, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, ANALYTIC CODE
- Time Frame
- Upon locking the study database upon completion of last patient's follow-up.
- Access Criteria
- After approval by the central Trial Management group and completion of a study data sharing agreement.
For international centres that would otherwise be precluded from participating in SARveillance, due to institutional level data sharing restrictions, provision has been made for prearranged Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis (IPDMA). The IPDMA essentially replicates the instruments and processes of SARveillance at a single site level and allows for the PI to provide data for meta-analysis at the close of SARveillance. As the IPDMA derived data is supported by identical trial processes and materials, the subsequent data submitted for meta-analysis will be comparable in quality, safeguarding the statistical integrity of SARveillance during the meta-analysis. Centres within the trial delivery network that utilise the IPDMA process will be internal sponsors for SARveillance at the institutional level and are required to complete a pre-emptive agreement to share unidentified data with the trial network coordinating institutions for meta-analysis when SARveillance closes.