NCT06480396

Brief Summary

The SARveillance trial is an efficient, pragmatic, multi-centre, international, stratified, partially-randomised, patient-preference trial within a registry of high versus lower intensity radiological surveillance following primary resection of retroperitoneal, abdominal and pelvic soft tissue sarcoma. The trial design is stratified by sarcoma tumour grade (high/intermediate grade and low grade).

Trial Health

67
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
584

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for phase_3

Timeline
93mo left

Started Nov 2024

Longer than P75 for phase_3

Geographic Reach
2 countries

2 active sites

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress17%
Nov 2024Dec 2033

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 24, 2024

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 28, 2024

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 1, 2024

Completed
9.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2033

Expected
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2033

Last Updated

October 16, 2024

Status Verified

June 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

9.1 years

First QC Date

June 24, 2024

Last Update Submit

October 14, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

SurveillanceRadiologySurgeryQuality of lifeCost-effectiveness

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Emotional Functioning

    Quality of life, assessed using Emotional Functioning domain (items 21-24) of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life questionnaire (QLQ-C30). Each of the four items for this functional domain are scored between 1 and 4 (range: 3) to a total of 16 points, scaled to a total out of 100 using a validated formula from the EORTC scoring manual.

    5 years

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Overall survival

    5 years

  • Cancer worry scale

    5 years

  • Health utility

    5 years

Other Outcomes (1)

  • Disease free survival

    5 years

Study Arms (2)

High-intensity radiological surveillance

EXPERIMENTAL

High/intermediate grade histology: 3-4 monthly CT scan up to 2-years postoperatively, 6-monthly CT scan from 2-5 years postoperatively (schedule 1) Low grade histology: 6-monthly CT scan up to 2-years postoperatively, annual CT scan from 2-5 years postoperatively (schedule 2)

Diagnostic Test: High-intensity radiological surveillance

Lower-intensity radiological surveillance

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

High intermediate grade histology: 6-monthly CT scan up to 2-years postoperatively, annual CT scan from 2-5 years postoperatively (schedule 2) Low grade histology: Annual CT scan up to 2-years postoperatively, 18 monthly CT scan from 2-5 years postoperatively (schedule 3)

Diagnostic Test: Lower-intensity radiological surveillance

Interventions

The standard approach to surveillance imaging will be contrasted CT (IV and oral contrast) of the chest, abdomen and pelvis. All patients require radiological assessment of the chest, abdomen and pelvis at each surveillance round. Tolerance will be given in the protocol for selected patients where CT is not suitable to receive alternative imaging such as MRI or combination of MRI and CT. Uncontrasted CT imaging is permissible where renal toxicity or allergy from intravenous contrast is of concern. The use of plain radiography is not permitted as an alternative to CT imaging of the chest.

High-intensity radiological surveillance

The standard approach to surveillance imaging will be contrasted CT (IV and oral contrast) of the chest, abdomen and pelvis. All patients require radiological assessment of the chest, abdomen and pelvis at each surveillance round. Tolerance will be given in the protocol for selected patients where CT is not suitable to receive alternative imaging such as MRI or combination of MRI and CT. Uncontrasted CT imaging is permissible where renal toxicity or allergy from intravenous contrast is of concern. The use of plain radiography is not permitted as an alternative to CT imaging of the chest.

Lower-intensity radiological surveillance

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Adult patients (greater than 18 years)
  • Primary resection
  • Histologically confirmed retroperitoneal, abdominal or pelvic soft tissue sarcoma
  • R0/R1 resection
  • Eligible whether or not the participant undergoes neoadjuvant treatment

You may not qualify if:

  • Metastatic disease at time of randomisation
  • Recurrent, metastatic or residual disease identified on baseline CT imaging (3-4 months post primary resection)
  • Reoperation for recurrent soft tissue sarcoma
  • Re-resection following previous inadequate surgery
  • R2 resection
  • Patients receiving adjuvant therapy that will delay, interrupt or render radiological surveillance unpredictable
  • Uterine sarcomas, gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST), fibromatosis, epithelial tumours, multifocal disease, sarcomas of bony origin
  • Patient declined to consent to data sharing with RESAR (unless in a centre contributing via pre-planned IPDMA)

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori

Milan, Lombardy, 20133, Italy

Location

University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust

Birmingham, West Midlands, B15 2GW, United Kingdom

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Baia M, Ford SJ, Dumitra S, Sama L, Naumann DN, Spolverato G, Callegaro D. Follow-up of patients with retroperitoneal sarcoma. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2023 Jun;49(6):1125-1132. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2022.02.016. Epub 2022 Mar 4.

    PMID: 35277304BACKGROUND

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Sarcoma

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neoplasms, Connective and Soft TissueNeoplasms by Histologic TypeNeoplasms

Study Officials

  • Samuel Ford, PhD

    samuel.ford@uhb.nhs.uk

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Patients that are willing to be randomised will be allocated in a 1:1 ratio to a high or lower intensity follow-up schedule. The trial design is partially randomised controlled and partly patient choice with patient preference arms (PPAs) for those that decline randomisation. Patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria and willing to be recruited will be stratified by tumour grade and then randomised to either high or lower intensity surveillance. Patients who decline randomisation will subsequently be offered the opportunity to participate within the PPAs. The PPAs will allow participating patients to choose either high or lower intensity surveillance arms. The data generated from the PPAs will not be included in the comparison of randomised arms. However, they will give important insight into patients' motivations in choosing high or lower intensity surveillance.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 24, 2024

First Posted

June 28, 2024

Study Start

November 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2033

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2033

Last Updated

October 16, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-06

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

For international centres that would otherwise be precluded from participating in SARveillance, due to institutional level data sharing restrictions, provision has been made for prearranged Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis (IPDMA). The IPDMA essentially replicates the instruments and processes of SARveillance at a single site level and allows for the PI to provide data for meta-analysis at the close of SARveillance. As the IPDMA derived data is supported by identical trial processes and materials, the subsequent data submitted for meta-analysis will be comparable in quality, safeguarding the statistical integrity of SARveillance during the meta-analysis. Centres within the trial delivery network that utilise the IPDMA process will be internal sponsors for SARveillance at the institutional level and are required to complete a pre-emptive agreement to share unidentified data with the trial network coordinating institutions for meta-analysis when SARveillance closes.

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, ANALYTIC CODE
Time Frame
Upon locking the study database upon completion of last patient's follow-up.
Access Criteria
After approval by the central Trial Management group and completion of a study data sharing agreement.

Locations