Transdiagnostic Behavior Therapy Vs TAU for Adjustment Disorder Following Traumatic Event Exposure

NCT06433271 | Recruiting

• 2 other identifiers: Pro00134707PR230007
• Study Type: interventional
• Target: 150
• Locations: 1 country
• Sites: 1

Brief Summary

Adjustment Disorder (AjD) is the most common mental health condition diagnosed in Active Duty personnel, and is diagnosed following an extreme stress event such as traumatic loss of a comrade, serious accident or injury, or other intense stress event. Despite its high prevalence, no evidence based treatment for AjD has been subjected to randomized controlled trials. This study seeks to build on the research team's pilot work across several disorders study to benefit service members and Veterans with AjD, a highly prevalent but frequently inadequately treated condition. The investigators will compare the effects of Transdiagnostic Behavior Therapy (TBT) vs treatment as usual which is Moving Forward Problem Solving Therapy (TAU-PST) on AjD symptom outcomes. The investigators hypothesize that TBT will result in greater overall symptom reduction compared to TAU-PST.

Conditions

Adjustment Disorders; Mental Disorder

Keywords

Veterans; Military Personnel

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (12)

• Adjustment Disorder New Module Self Report

  The Adjustment Disorder New Module (ADNM) is a 20-item self-report measure of AjD that first asks participants to select from a list of past year stressors and to identify which was the most prominent or distressing. The second section comprises 20 items, which form six subscales in accordance with International Classification of Diseases 11th Revision (ICD-11) criteria relating to pre-occupation, failure to adapt, avoidance, depressive mood, anxiety, and impulse disturbance (Lorenz et al., 2016). Participants rate on a 4-point Likert scale how often they have experienced particular symptoms during the past two weeks, and overall symptom severity is calculated as a sum of all item scores. Total score ranges from 20-80, with a higher score indicating a higher risk of developing adjustment disorder.

  Baseline

• Adjustment Disorder New Module Self Report

  The ADNM is a 20-item self-report measure of AjD that first asks participants to select from a list of past year stressors and to identify which was the most prominent or distressing. The second section comprises 20 items, which form six subscales in accordance with ICD-11 criteria relating to pre-occupation, failure to adapt, avoidance, depressive mood, anxiety, and impulse disturbance (Lorenz et al., 2016). Participants rate on a 4-point Likert scale how often they have experienced particular symptoms during the past two weeks, and overall symptom severity is calculated as a sum of all item scores. Total score ranges from 20-80, with a higher score indicating a higher risk of developing adjustment disorder.

  1 week post treatment

• Adjustment Disorder New Module Self Report

  The ADNM is a 20-item self-report measure of AjD that first asks participants to select from a list of past year stressors and to identify which was the most prominent or distressing. The second section comprises 20 items, which form six subscales in accordance with ICD-11 criteria relating to pre-occupation, failure to adapt, avoidance, depressive mood, anxiety, and impulse disturbance (Lorenz et al., 2016). Participants rate on a 4-point Likert scale how often they have experienced particular symptoms during the past two weeks, and overall symptom severity is calculated as a sum of all item scores. Total score ranges from 20-80, with a higher score indicating a higher risk of developing adjustment disorder.

  3 months post treatment

• Adjustment Disorder New Module Self Report

  The ADNM is a 20-item self-report measure of AjD that first asks participants to select from a list of past year stressors and to identify which was the most prominent or distressing. The second section comprises 20 items, which form six subscales in accordance with ICD-11 criteria relating to pre-occupation, failure to adapt, avoidance, depressive mood, anxiety, and impulse disturbance (Lorenz et al., 2016). Participants rate on a 4-point Likert scale how often they have experienced particular symptoms during the past two weeks, and overall symptom severity is calculated as a sum of all item scores. Total score ranges from 20-80, with a higher score indicating a higher risk of developing adjustment disorder.

  6 months post treatment

• Generalized Anxiety Disorder Questionnaire - 7

  The Generalized Anxiety Disorder Questionnaire (GAD-7; Spitzer et al., 2006) consists of seven items measuring worry and anxiety symptoms. Each item is scored on a four-point Likert scale (0-3) with total scores ranging from 0 to 21 with higher scores reflecting greater anxiety severity.of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5) (PCL-5) (Weathers et al., 2013) is structured to correspond to the DSM-5 PTSD criteria. The 20-items are scored on a 0-4 Likert scale for each symptom corresponding to "Not at all" to "Extremely". Total score ranges from 0 to 80, with a higher score indicating greater PTSD symptom severity.

  Baseline

• Generalized Anxiety Disorder Questionnaire - 7

  The Generalized Anxiety Disorder Questionnaire (GAD-7; Spitzer et al., 2006) consists of seven items measuring worry and anxiety symptoms. Each item is scored on a four-point Likert scale (0-3) with total scores ranging from 0 to 21 with higher scores reflecting greater anxiety severity.of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5) (PCL-5) (Weathers et al., 2013) is structured to correspond to the DSM-5 PTSD criteria. The 20-items are scored on a 0-4 Likert scale for each symptom corresponding to "Not at all" to "Extremely". Total score ranges from 0 to 80, with a higher score indicating greater PTSD symptom severity.

  1 week post treatment

• Generalized Anxiety Disorder Questionnaire - 7

  The Generalized Anxiety Disorder Questionnaire (GAD-7; Spitzer et al., 2006) consists of seven items measuring worry and anxiety symptoms. Each item is scored on a four-point Likert scale (0-3) with total scores ranging from 0 to 21 with higher scores reflecting greater anxiety severity.of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5) (PCL-5) (Weathers et al., 2013) is structured to correspond to the DSM-5 PTSD criteria. The 20-items are scored on a 0-4 Likert scale for each symptom corresponding to "Not at all" to "Extremely". Total score ranges from 0 to 80, with a higher score indicating greater PTSD symptom severity.

  3 months post treatment

• Generalized Anxiety Disorder Questionnaire - 7

  The Generalized Anxiety Disorder Questionnaire (GAD-7; Spitzer et al., 2006) consists of seven items measuring worry and anxiety symptoms. Each item is scored on a four-point Likert scale (0-3) with total scores ranging from 0 to 21 with higher scores reflecting greater anxiety severity.of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5) (PCL-5) (Weathers et al., 2013) is structured to correspond to the DSM-5 PTSD criteria. The 20-items are scored on a 0-4 Likert scale for each symptom corresponding to "Not at all" to "Extremely". Total score ranges from 0 to 80, with a higher score indicating greater PTSD symptom severity.

  6 months post treatment

• Patient Health Questionnaire-9

  The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) (Kroenke et al., 2001) is a widely used, well-validated measure of depression severity with high internal consistency (alpha .83 to .92; Cameron et al, 2008) and is correlated strongly with other depression measures. Its nine items assess affective and somatic symptoms and correspond to diagnostic criteria for major depressive disorder (MDD). This measure will also be collected every other week during treatment. Total score ranges from 0 to 27 (scores of 5-9 are classified as mild depression; 10-14 as moderate depression; 15-19 as moderately severe depression; ≥ 20 as severe depression).

  Baseline

• Patient Health Questionnaire-9

  The PHQ-9 (Kroenke et al., 2001) is a widely used, well-validated measure of depression severity with high internal consistency (alpha .83 to .92; Cameron et al, 2008) and is correlated strongly with other depression measures. Its nine items assess affective and somatic symptoms and correspond to diagnostic criteria for MDD. This measure will also be collected every other week during treatment. Total score ranges from 0 to 27 (scores of 5-9 are classified as mild depression; 10-14 as moderate depression; 15-19 as moderately severe depression; ≥ 20 as severe depression).

  1 week post treatment

• Patient Health Questionnaire-9

  The PHQ-9 (Kroenke et al., 2001) is a widely used, well-validated measure of depression severity with high internal consistency (alpha .83 to .92; Cameron et al, 2008) and is correlated strongly with other depression measures. Its nine items assess affective and somatic symptoms and correspond to diagnostic criteria for MDD. This measure will also be collected every other week during treatment. Total score ranges from 0 to 27 (scores of 5-9 are classified as mild depression; 10-14 as moderate depression; 15-19 as moderately severe depression; ≥ 20 as severe depression).

  3 months post treatment

• Patient Health Questionnaire-9

  The PHQ-9 (Kroenke et al., 2001) is a widely used, well-validated measure of depression severity with high internal consistency (alpha .83 to .92; Cameron et al, 2008) and is correlated strongly with other depression measures. Its nine items assess affective and somatic symptoms and correspond to diagnostic criteria for MDD. This measure will also be collected every other week during treatment. Total score ranges from 0 to 27 (scores of 5-9 are classified as mild depression; 10-14 as moderate depression; 15-19 as moderately severe depression; ≥ 20 as severe depression).

  6 months post treatment

Secondary Outcomes (9)

• Insomnia Severity Index

  Baseline

• Insomnia Severity Index

  1 week post treatment

• Insomnia Severity Index

  3 months post treatment

• Insomnia Severity Index

  6 months post treatment

• Medical Outcome Study Short Form-36 Health Survey

  Baseline

Study Arms (2)

Transdiagnostic Behavior Therapy (TBT)

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants will receive 6, 30-45-minute, manualized, individual therapy sessions.

Behavioral: Transdiagnostic Behavior Therapy (TBT)

Active Comparator: Treatment as Usual-Problem Solving Therapy (TAU-PST)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Participants will receive 6, 30-45-minute, manualized, individual therapy sessions.

Behavioral: Treatment as Usual-Problem Solving Therapy (TAU-PST)

Interventions

Transdiagnostic Behavior Therapy (TBT) BEHAVIORAL

TBT manualized treatment incorporates daily exposure exercises from up to four categories of avoidance that are most characteristic of the emotional disorders (i.e., situational, interoceptive, imaginal, and positive emotional).

Transdiagnostic Behavior Therapy (TBT)

Treatment as Usual-Problem Solving Therapy (TAU-PST) BEHAVIORAL

PST is an evidence- based psychotherapy implemented in VA Primary Care - Mental Health Integration (PC-MHI), with hundreds of VA providers trained in the intervention nationally. The primary aim of PST is to improve a patient's ability to cope with stressful events by adopting an adaptive perspective to stressors and using goal-focused, problem-solving behaviors to manage the problems associated with the stressors.

Also known as: Moving Forward Problem Solving Therapy

Active Comparator: Treatment as Usual-Problem Solving Therapy (TAU-PST)

Eligibility Criteria

• Age: 18 Years+
• Sex: all
• Healthy Volunteers: No
• Age Groups: Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

• Adult male or female over the age of 18 that has served, or is currently serving, in the military.
• Stable psychotropic medication for at least 4 weeks if applicable
• Current DSM-5 diagnosis of Adjustment Disorder

You may not qualify if:

• Active psychosis
• Suicidal ideation with clear intent
• Severe substance use

Sponsors & Collaborators

• The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston: lead
• Ralph H. Johnson VA Medical Center: collaborator
• U.S. Army Medical Research and Development Command: collaborator

Study Sites (1)

Ralph H. Johnson VA Health Care System

Charleston, South Carolina, 29401, United States

RECRUITING

Related Publications (4)

• Gros DF. Development and initial evaluation of Transdiagnostic Behavior Therapy (TBT) for veterans with affective disorders. Psychiatry Res. 2014 Dec 15;220(1-2):275-82. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2014.08.018. Epub 2014 Aug 15.

  PMID: 25193379 BACKGROUND

• Gros DF, Allan NP. A randomized controlled trial comparing Transdiagnostic Behavior Therapy (TBT) and behavioral activation in veterans with affective disorders. Psychiatry Res. 2019 Nov;281:112541. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2019.112541. Epub 2019 Aug 29.

  PMID: 31514043 BACKGROUND

• Gros DF, Merrifield C, Rowa K, Szafranski DD, Young L, McCabe RE. A Naturalistic Comparison of Group Transdiagnostic Behaviour Therapy (TBT) and Disorder-Specific Cognitive Behavioural Therapy Groups for the Affective Disorders. Behav Cogn Psychother. 2019 Jan;47(1):39-51. doi: 10.1017/S1352465818000309. Epub 2018 May 29.

  PMID: 29807553 BACKGROUND

• Gros DF, Szafranski DD, Shead SD. A real world dissemination and implementation of Transdiagnostic Behavior Therapy (TBT) for veterans with affective disorders. J Anxiety Disord. 2017 Mar;46:72-77. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2016.04.010. Epub 2016 Apr 27.

  PMID: 27158076 BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Adjustment Disorders; Mental Disorders

Interventions

Therapeutics

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Trauma and Stressor Related Disorders

Study Officials

• Ron Acierno, PhD

  McGovern Medical School at UTHealth Houston

  PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Stephanie M Hart, MPH

CONTACT

8435775011; stephanie.hart4@va.gov

Study Design

• Study Type: interventional
• Phase: not applicable
• Allocation: RANDOMIZED
• Masking: SINGLE
• Who Masked: OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
• Purpose: TREATMENT
• Intervention Model: PARALLEL
• Sponsor Type: OTHER
• Responsible Party: PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
• PI Title: Professor

Study Record Dates

• First Submitted: May 22, 2024
• First Posted: May 29, 2024
• Study Start: October 8, 2024
• Primary Completion (Estimated): July 1, 2028
• Study Completion (Estimated): January 1, 2029
• Last Updated: December 6, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-12

Data Sharing

• IPD Sharing: Will not share

Locations

US (1)