NCT06412406

Brief Summary

AIM OF STUDY: Comparison between effect of external oblique intercostal plane block and the Oblique subcostal transversus abdominis plane block in paraumbilical hernia repair as analgesia for intraoperative and postoperative pain.

Trial Health

65
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
62

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
7mo left

Started Jun 2024

Typical duration for not_applicable

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress75%
Jun 2024Dec 2026

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 23, 2024

Completed
3 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 14, 2024

Completed
18 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 1, 2024

Completed
2.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 28, 2026

Expected
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 29, 2026

Last Updated

June 6, 2024

Status Verified

June 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

2.4 years

First QC Date

February 23, 2024

Last Update Submit

June 5, 2024

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • The effect between external oblique intercostal plane block and the transversus abdominis plane block in paraumbilical hernia repair as analgesia for intraoperative and postoperative pain according to numeric rating score (NRS)

    numeric rating scale : from 0 to 10 0 : no pain 1 - 3 : mild pain 4 - 6 : moderate pain 7 - 9 : severe pain 10 : worst pain possible

    baseline

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • time of the first opioid request

    baseline

  • Heart rate

    baseline

  • Mean arterial blood pressure

    baseline

  • time to start ambulation

    baseline

Study Arms (2)

Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Group A will include 31 patients to receive TAP block with 20 ml volume on each side (0.25 % bupivacaine)

Procedure: Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block

External Oblique intercostal (EOI) block

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Group B will include 31 patients to receive EOI block with 20 ml volume on each side ( 0.25% bupivacaine)

Procedure: External Oblique Intercostal (EOI) block

Interventions

EOI block technique A linear ultrasound transducer placed in the sagittal plane between the midclavicular and anterior axillary lines at the level of sixth rib, The transducer was then rotated so the cranial end was directed slightly medially and the caudal end laterally to produce a paramedian sagittal oblique view with a short-axis view of the ribs, The following structures were identified, from superficial to deep: subcutaneous tissue, external oblique muscle, intercostal muscles between ribs, pleura, and lung. The skin entry point for the injection was cranial to the sixth rib level just medial to the anterior axillary line, with ultrasound opaque needle advanced in plane from a superomedial-to-inferolateral direction, through the external oblique muscle hydrodissecting the tissue plane between the sixth and seventh ribs, and then the needle was directed caudally toward the eighth rib. and inject 20 ml volume of (0.25 % bupivacaine).

External Oblique intercostal (EOI) block

TAP block technique: abdominal skin will be prepared and covered with sterile drapes. The needle can be introduced by multiple punctures along the oblique subcostal line from the xiphoid process towards the anterior part of the iliac crest (18) . Thus, LA will be injected in the TAP along this line provides both upper and lower abdominal wall analgesia. The OSCTAP block more consistently covers L1 dermatome. After negative aspiration, a test injection with 1 ml of 0.9% normal saline will be performed to confirm the needle location. and ingect 20 ml volume of (0.25 % bupivacaine). If the intended sensation will not decreased in surgical dermatomes after 30 min, the patient will be regarded to have a failed block and will be excluded from the study.

Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Age between 18 and 65 years with a body mass index (BMI) of 18-35 kg/m2
  • patients with the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I/II
  • Patients scheduled for elective paraumbilical hernia

You may not qualify if:

  • Known hypersensitivity to the study drugs. 2-Body Mass Index \> 40 kg/m2. 3- Inability to accurately describe postoperative pain to investigators. 4-Opioid tolerance or dependence. 5-Preexisting history of chronic pain. 6-History of renal, liver, cardiac, neuropsychiatric disorder problems. 7-Bleeding or coagulation abnormality. 8-Patients who received any analgesic 24 h before surgery 9-Patients who have difficulty understanding the study protocol

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (17)

  • Tsai HC, Yoshida T, Chuang TY, Yang SF, Chang CC, Yao HY, Tai YT, Lin JA, Chen KY. Transversus Abdominis Plane Block: An Updated Review of Anatomy and Techniques. Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:8284363. doi: 10.1155/2017/8284363. Epub 2017 Oct 31.

    PMID: 29226150BACKGROUND
  • Rozen WM, Tran TM, Ashton MW, Barrington MJ, Ivanusic JJ, Taylor GI. Refining the course of the thoracolumbar nerves: a new understanding of the innervation of the anterior abdominal wall. Clin Anat. 2008 May;21(4):325-33. doi: 10.1002/ca.20621.

    PMID: 18428988BACKGROUND
  • Elsharkawy H, Maniker R, Bolash R, Kalasbail P, Drake RL, Elkassabany N. Rhomboid Intercostal and Subserratus Plane Block: A Cadaveric and Clinical Evaluation. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2018 Oct;43(7):745-751. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000824.

    PMID: 30169476BACKGROUND
  • Desai N, El-Boghdadly K, Albrecht E. Epidural vs. transversus abdominis plane block for abdominal surgery - a systematic review, meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis. Anaesthesia. 2021 Jan;76(1):101-117. doi: 10.1111/anae.15068. Epub 2020 May 8.

    PMID: 32385856BACKGROUND
  • Qin C, Liu Y, Xiong J, Wang X, Dong Q, Su T, Liu J. The analgesic efficacy compared ultrasound-guided continuous transverse abdominis plane block with epidural analgesia following abdominal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Anesthesiol. 2020 Feb 28;20(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s12871-020-00969-0.

    PMID: 32111162BACKGROUND
  • Macrae WA. Chronic post-surgical pain: 10 years on. Br J Anaesth. 2008 Jul;101(1):77-86. doi: 10.1093/bja/aen099. Epub 2008 Apr 22.

    PMID: 18434337BACKGROUND
  • Gan TJ, Diemunsch P, Habib AS, Kovac A, Kranke P, Meyer TA, Watcha M, Chung F, Angus S, Apfel CC, Bergese SD, Candiotti KA, Chan MT, Davis PJ, Hooper VD, Lagoo-Deenadayalan S, Myles P, Nezat G, Philip BK, Tramer MR; Society for Ambulatory Anesthesia. Consensus guidelines for the management of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Anesth Analg. 2014 Jan;118(1):85-113. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000002.

    PMID: 24356162BACKGROUND
  • Elsharkawy H, Pawa A, Mariano ER. Interfascial Plane Blocks: Back to Basics. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2018 May;43(4):341-346. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000750.

    PMID: 29561295BACKGROUND
  • Sondekoppam RV, Brookes J, Morris L, Johnson M, Ganapathy S. Injectate spread following ultrasound-guided lateral to medial approach for dual transversus abdominis plane blocks. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2015 Mar;59(3):369-76. doi: 10.1111/aas.12459. Epub 2015 Jan 13.

    PMID: 25582299BACKGROUND
  • Borglum J, Jensen K, Christensen AF, Hoegberg LC, Johansen SS, Lonnqvist PA, Jansen T. Distribution patterns, dermatomal anesthesia, and ropivacaine serum concentrations after bilateral dual transversus abdominis plane block. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2012 May-Jun;37(3):294-301. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e31824c20a9.

    PMID: 22476239BACKGROUND
  • Tulgar S, Senturk O, Selvi O, Balaban O, Ahiskalioglu A, Thomas DT, Ozer Z. Perichondral approach for blockage of thoracoabdominal nerves: Anatomical basis and clinical experience in three cases. J Clin Anesth. 2019 May;54:8-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2018.10.015. Epub 2018 Oct 31. No abstract available.

    PMID: 30388604BACKGROUND
  • Hutchins J, Delaney D, Vogel RI, Ghebre RG, Downs LS Jr, Carson L, Mullany S, Teoh D, Geller MA. Ultrasound guided subcostal transversus abdominis plane (TAP) infiltration with liposomal bupivacaine for patients undergoing robotic assisted hysterectomy: A prospective randomized controlled study. Gynecol Oncol. 2015 Sep;138(3):609-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.06.008. Epub 2015 Jun 6.

    PMID: 26056753BACKGROUND
  • Hebbard PD, Barrington MJ, Vasey C. Ultrasound-guided continuous oblique subcostal transversus abdominis plane blockade: description of anatomy and clinical technique. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2010 Sep-Oct;35(5):436-41. doi: 10.1097/aap.0b013e3181e66702.

    PMID: 20830871BACKGROUND
  • Cosarcan SK, Ercelen O. The analgesic contribution of external oblique intercostal block: Case reports of 3 different surgeries and 3 spectacular effects. Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Sep 9;101(36):e30435. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000030435.

    PMID: 36086688BACKGROUND
  • Karcioglu O, Topacoglu H, Dikme O, Dikme O. A systematic review of the pain scales in adults: Which to use? Am J Emerg Med. 2018 Apr;36(4):707-714. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2018.01.008. Epub 2018 Jan 6.

    PMID: 29321111BACKGROUND
  • Marhofer P, Harrop-Griffiths W, Kettner SC, Kirchmair L. Fifteen years of ultrasound guidance in regional anaesthesia: part 1. Br J Anaesth. 2010 May;104(5):538-46. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeq069. Epub 2010 Apr 2.

    PMID: 20364022BACKGROUND
  • Soliz JM, Lipski I, Hancher-Hodges S, Speer BB, Popat K. Subcostal Transverse Abdominis Plane Block for Acute Pain Management: A Review. Anesth Pain Med. 2017 Oct 20;7(5):e12923. doi: 10.5812/aapm.12923. eCollection 2017 Oct.

    PMID: 29696110BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Dental Occlusion

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

DentistryDental Physiological PhenomenaDigestive System and Oral Physiological Phenomena

Study Officials

  • Nawal A Gadelrab, Professor

    Assiut University

    STUDY CHAIR
  • Abdelrahim M Mohamed, Professor

    Assiut University

    STUDY CHAIR
  • Mohamed G Hassan, Resident

    Assiut University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Mohamed G Hassan, Resident

CONTACT

Abdelrahim M Mohamed, Professor

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
principal investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 23, 2024

First Posted

May 14, 2024

Study Start

June 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

October 28, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 29, 2026

Last Updated

June 6, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-06

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share