Comparison Between External Oblique Intercostal Plane Block and the Transversus Abdominis Plane Block in Paraumbilical Hernia Repair as Analgesia for Intraoperative and Postoperative Pain.
1 other identifier
interventional
62
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
AIM OF STUDY: Comparison between effect of external oblique intercostal plane block and the Oblique subcostal transversus abdominis plane block in paraumbilical hernia repair as analgesia for intraoperative and postoperative pain.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2024
Typical duration for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 23, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 14, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 28, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 29, 2026
June 6, 2024
June 1, 2024
2.4 years
February 23, 2024
June 5, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The effect between external oblique intercostal plane block and the transversus abdominis plane block in paraumbilical hernia repair as analgesia for intraoperative and postoperative pain according to numeric rating score (NRS)
numeric rating scale : from 0 to 10 0 : no pain 1 - 3 : mild pain 4 - 6 : moderate pain 7 - 9 : severe pain 10 : worst pain possible
baseline
Secondary Outcomes (4)
time of the first opioid request
baseline
Heart rate
baseline
Mean arterial blood pressure
baseline
time to start ambulation
baseline
Study Arms (2)
Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block
ACTIVE COMPARATORGroup A will include 31 patients to receive TAP block with 20 ml volume on each side (0.25 % bupivacaine)
External Oblique intercostal (EOI) block
ACTIVE COMPARATORGroup B will include 31 patients to receive EOI block with 20 ml volume on each side ( 0.25% bupivacaine)
Interventions
EOI block technique A linear ultrasound transducer placed in the sagittal plane between the midclavicular and anterior axillary lines at the level of sixth rib, The transducer was then rotated so the cranial end was directed slightly medially and the caudal end laterally to produce a paramedian sagittal oblique view with a short-axis view of the ribs, The following structures were identified, from superficial to deep: subcutaneous tissue, external oblique muscle, intercostal muscles between ribs, pleura, and lung. The skin entry point for the injection was cranial to the sixth rib level just medial to the anterior axillary line, with ultrasound opaque needle advanced in plane from a superomedial-to-inferolateral direction, through the external oblique muscle hydrodissecting the tissue plane between the sixth and seventh ribs, and then the needle was directed caudally toward the eighth rib. and inject 20 ml volume of (0.25 % bupivacaine).
TAP block technique: abdominal skin will be prepared and covered with sterile drapes. The needle can be introduced by multiple punctures along the oblique subcostal line from the xiphoid process towards the anterior part of the iliac crest (18) . Thus, LA will be injected in the TAP along this line provides both upper and lower abdominal wall analgesia. The OSCTAP block more consistently covers L1 dermatome. After negative aspiration, a test injection with 1 ml of 0.9% normal saline will be performed to confirm the needle location. and ingect 20 ml volume of (0.25 % bupivacaine). If the intended sensation will not decreased in surgical dermatomes after 30 min, the patient will be regarded to have a failed block and will be excluded from the study.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age between 18 and 65 years with a body mass index (BMI) of 18-35 kg/m2
- patients with the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I/II
- Patients scheduled for elective paraumbilical hernia
You may not qualify if:
- Known hypersensitivity to the study drugs. 2-Body Mass Index \> 40 kg/m2. 3- Inability to accurately describe postoperative pain to investigators. 4-Opioid tolerance or dependence. 5-Preexisting history of chronic pain. 6-History of renal, liver, cardiac, neuropsychiatric disorder problems. 7-Bleeding or coagulation abnormality. 8-Patients who received any analgesic 24 h before surgery 9-Patients who have difficulty understanding the study protocol
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (17)
Tsai HC, Yoshida T, Chuang TY, Yang SF, Chang CC, Yao HY, Tai YT, Lin JA, Chen KY. Transversus Abdominis Plane Block: An Updated Review of Anatomy and Techniques. Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:8284363. doi: 10.1155/2017/8284363. Epub 2017 Oct 31.
PMID: 29226150BACKGROUNDRozen WM, Tran TM, Ashton MW, Barrington MJ, Ivanusic JJ, Taylor GI. Refining the course of the thoracolumbar nerves: a new understanding of the innervation of the anterior abdominal wall. Clin Anat. 2008 May;21(4):325-33. doi: 10.1002/ca.20621.
PMID: 18428988BACKGROUNDElsharkawy H, Maniker R, Bolash R, Kalasbail P, Drake RL, Elkassabany N. Rhomboid Intercostal and Subserratus Plane Block: A Cadaveric and Clinical Evaluation. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2018 Oct;43(7):745-751. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000824.
PMID: 30169476BACKGROUNDDesai N, El-Boghdadly K, Albrecht E. Epidural vs. transversus abdominis plane block for abdominal surgery - a systematic review, meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis. Anaesthesia. 2021 Jan;76(1):101-117. doi: 10.1111/anae.15068. Epub 2020 May 8.
PMID: 32385856BACKGROUNDQin C, Liu Y, Xiong J, Wang X, Dong Q, Su T, Liu J. The analgesic efficacy compared ultrasound-guided continuous transverse abdominis plane block with epidural analgesia following abdominal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Anesthesiol. 2020 Feb 28;20(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s12871-020-00969-0.
PMID: 32111162BACKGROUNDMacrae WA. Chronic post-surgical pain: 10 years on. Br J Anaesth. 2008 Jul;101(1):77-86. doi: 10.1093/bja/aen099. Epub 2008 Apr 22.
PMID: 18434337BACKGROUNDGan TJ, Diemunsch P, Habib AS, Kovac A, Kranke P, Meyer TA, Watcha M, Chung F, Angus S, Apfel CC, Bergese SD, Candiotti KA, Chan MT, Davis PJ, Hooper VD, Lagoo-Deenadayalan S, Myles P, Nezat G, Philip BK, Tramer MR; Society for Ambulatory Anesthesia. Consensus guidelines for the management of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Anesth Analg. 2014 Jan;118(1):85-113. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000002.
PMID: 24356162BACKGROUNDElsharkawy H, Pawa A, Mariano ER. Interfascial Plane Blocks: Back to Basics. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2018 May;43(4):341-346. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000750.
PMID: 29561295BACKGROUNDSondekoppam RV, Brookes J, Morris L, Johnson M, Ganapathy S. Injectate spread following ultrasound-guided lateral to medial approach for dual transversus abdominis plane blocks. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2015 Mar;59(3):369-76. doi: 10.1111/aas.12459. Epub 2015 Jan 13.
PMID: 25582299BACKGROUNDBorglum J, Jensen K, Christensen AF, Hoegberg LC, Johansen SS, Lonnqvist PA, Jansen T. Distribution patterns, dermatomal anesthesia, and ropivacaine serum concentrations after bilateral dual transversus abdominis plane block. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2012 May-Jun;37(3):294-301. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e31824c20a9.
PMID: 22476239BACKGROUNDTulgar S, Senturk O, Selvi O, Balaban O, Ahiskalioglu A, Thomas DT, Ozer Z. Perichondral approach for blockage of thoracoabdominal nerves: Anatomical basis and clinical experience in three cases. J Clin Anesth. 2019 May;54:8-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2018.10.015. Epub 2018 Oct 31. No abstract available.
PMID: 30388604BACKGROUNDHutchins J, Delaney D, Vogel RI, Ghebre RG, Downs LS Jr, Carson L, Mullany S, Teoh D, Geller MA. Ultrasound guided subcostal transversus abdominis plane (TAP) infiltration with liposomal bupivacaine for patients undergoing robotic assisted hysterectomy: A prospective randomized controlled study. Gynecol Oncol. 2015 Sep;138(3):609-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.06.008. Epub 2015 Jun 6.
PMID: 26056753BACKGROUNDHebbard PD, Barrington MJ, Vasey C. Ultrasound-guided continuous oblique subcostal transversus abdominis plane blockade: description of anatomy and clinical technique. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2010 Sep-Oct;35(5):436-41. doi: 10.1097/aap.0b013e3181e66702.
PMID: 20830871BACKGROUNDCosarcan SK, Ercelen O. The analgesic contribution of external oblique intercostal block: Case reports of 3 different surgeries and 3 spectacular effects. Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Sep 9;101(36):e30435. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000030435.
PMID: 36086688BACKGROUNDKarcioglu O, Topacoglu H, Dikme O, Dikme O. A systematic review of the pain scales in adults: Which to use? Am J Emerg Med. 2018 Apr;36(4):707-714. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2018.01.008. Epub 2018 Jan 6.
PMID: 29321111BACKGROUNDMarhofer P, Harrop-Griffiths W, Kettner SC, Kirchmair L. Fifteen years of ultrasound guidance in regional anaesthesia: part 1. Br J Anaesth. 2010 May;104(5):538-46. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeq069. Epub 2010 Apr 2.
PMID: 20364022BACKGROUNDSoliz JM, Lipski I, Hancher-Hodges S, Speer BB, Popat K. Subcostal Transverse Abdominis Plane Block for Acute Pain Management: A Review. Anesth Pain Med. 2017 Oct 20;7(5):e12923. doi: 10.5812/aapm.12923. eCollection 2017 Oct.
PMID: 29696110BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Nawal A Gadelrab, Professor
Assiut University
- STUDY CHAIR
Abdelrahim M Mohamed, Professor
Assiut University
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Mohamed G Hassan, Resident
Assiut University
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- principal investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 23, 2024
First Posted
May 14, 2024
Study Start
June 1, 2024
Primary Completion (Estimated)
October 28, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 29, 2026
Last Updated
June 6, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share