Feasibility and Effectiveness of a Novel Neck Training Device

NCT06410846 | Active Not Recruiting

• 1 other identifier: FY22-03
• Study Type: interventional
• Target: 60
• Locations: 1 country
• Sites: 1

Brief Summary

Functional training focusing on dynamic, multiplanar eccentric loading of the neck's complex musculature may provide a unique training effect that may protect against neck injuries and mTBI. The purpose of this study is to test the efficacy and adherence of a 12-week TopSpin360 training regimen on important physiologic and performance outcome measures between an intervention group and a control group. The specific aims are 1) to compare differences in four physiologic neck measures and two TopSpin360 performance measures by group and gender, and 2) to evaluate program adherence.

Conditions

Injury Prevention

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (5)

• Change in neck circumference measurement over time

  Describe change in neck measurement (inches) between intervention and control groups and gender. Examiner will use Gulick tape measure at the midcervical spine level at mid-point between the suboccipital junction and the C7 spinous process.

  Day 1 and post 12 week exercise follow up visit day

• Change in cervical spine range of motion (ROM) measurements over time

  ROM will be measured using smartphone inclinometer and compass measurements of cervical uniplanar (FL/EXT) and multiplanar (rotation) motion .These measurements have been found to be both reliable and 51 valid by Guidetti et.al. (2017) who demonstrated ICC \> .99 with minimally detectable change (MDC) of 4-8 degrees and percentage errors between 1-3%.The 52 overcomes the limitation of protractor measurement as a source of error in cervical spine measures as there is no reference to vertical or horizontal, relying on the visual perceptual skills of the examiner and a lack of a standard position.

  Day 1 and post 12 week exercise follow up visit day

• Change in Maximum Voluntary Isometric Contraction Testing (MVIC) over time

  The hand-held strain gage dynamometer (Lafayette Instruments HHD) will be conducted by the examiner and record the average of 3 trials most representative of best effort. HHD has demonstrated ICCs of .95 between HHD and the gold standard of MVIC measurement using a Cybex isokinetic device in stroke patients and that the make test demonstrated break force ICCs of .981.53 Isokinetic devices (Kin Com and Cybex) and the strain-gage HHD demonstrate a high test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.998) against a known load. MVIC 54 testing using a HHD requires that the examiner elicit the subject's maximum force against the dynamometer and examiner who holds the dynamometer steady. The Lafayette handheld dynamometer utilizes a microprocessor control unit that measures peak force, time to reach peak force, and total test time with an audible tone to indicate the end of preset time. The unit also provides a built-in calibration routine with an internal accuracy of + 1%.

  Day 1 and post 12 week exercise follow up visit day

• Change in speed for Peak Revolutions per minute (RPM) over time (TopSpin group only)

  An Inflatable pressure biofeedback device is used for the Craniocervical flexion test (CCFT). The CCFT of the deep cervical spine flexors (longus capitus and colli) assesses the activation and isometric endurance of the deep cervical flexors as well as their interaction with the superficial flexors (sternocleidomastoid and anterior scalenes) during five progressive stages of craniocervical flexion, demonstrated 56-58 SCM and AS muscle fatigue during sustained cervical flexion contractions at 25 and 50% of maximum voluntary isometric contraction. Testing will be conducted according to Jull et. al.'s (2008) progressive protocol using a pressure biofeedback device (Figure 5). The CCFT has demonstrated nearly perfect intra-rater (ICC =.98; CI = .99) and inter-rater reliability (ICC = .91). Changes in speed over exercise program will be described.

  Day 1 and post 12 week exercise follow up visit day

• Change in speed for completion of 60 revolutions over time (TopSpin group only)

  Measure and describe completion of a total of 60 revolutions (30 clockwise and 30 counterclockwise) as quickly as possible. During the test, when the participant completes the first 30 revolutions, they will stop the lever arm in front of their face and then perform the remaining 30 revolutions counterclockwise. The total time is recorded in seconds and is downloaded from the TopSpin app.

  Day 1 and post 12 week exercise follow up visit day

Study Arms (2)

TopSpin device

EXPERIMENTAL

TopSpin360 device/neck strengthening exercises.

Device: TopSpin360

Control group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Neck Strengthening exercises.

Other: Neck Strengthening Exercise Plan

Interventions

TopSpin360 DEVICE

Neck strength and conditioning device used during neck strengthening program.

TopSpin device

Neck Strengthening Exercise Plan OTHER

Physical therapist designed neck strengthening program.

Control group

Eligibility Criteria

• Age: 18 Years - 35 Years
• Sex: all
• Healthy Volunteers: Yes
• Age Groups: Adult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

• Healthy active-duty service members of any military rank assigned to LRMC
• years old
• assigned to Landstuhl Regional Medical Center
• own a personal cellphone to download the TopSpin360 App (intervention group)
• able to attend the two times per week training
• have sufficient time on station to complete entire study including post-study measures.

You may not qualify if:

• any medical profile that prevents full participation in the ACFT
• any chronic inner ear abnormalities (e.g., Meniere's disease or benign positional vertigo)
• history of invasive neck procedures (cortisone injections or neck surgery)
• any known cervical spine disorders (e.g., degenerative changes of the cervical spine) or gross cervical spine abnormalities when examined by the staff physical therapist
• non-US military personnel, i.e., German or Netherlands military personnel etc.

Sponsors & Collaborators

• Landstuhl Regional Medical Center: lead
• TriService Nursing Research Program: collaborator

Study Sites (1)

Landstuhl Regional Medical Center

Landstuhl, Rhineland-Palatinate, 66849, Germany

Location

Study Officials

• William Brown, PhD

  Martin Army Community Hospital

  STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

• Study Type: interventional
• Phase: not applicable
• Allocation: RANDOMIZED
• Masking: NONE
• Purpose: PREVENTION
• Intervention Model: PARALLEL
• Sponsor Type: FED
• Responsible Party: SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

• First Submitted: April 15, 2024
• First Posted: May 13, 2024
• Study Start: March 5, 2024
• Primary Completion: February 23, 2026
• Study Completion: February 23, 2026
• Last Updated: March 5, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-03

Data Sharing

• IPD Sharing: Will not share

Locations

DE (1)