NCT06410326

Brief Summary

Some MS patients quickly accumulate neurological deficits, while others remain well for decades. Even though associations with age, sex, health behaviors, comorbidities and social determinants of health are widely acknowledged, the clinical heterogeneity in MS is poorly understood and variables with a robust prognostic value are lacking. Recent data suggest a key role for resilience in the central nervous system, potentially supporting the concept of neurological reserve in MS.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
2,600

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2024

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 1, 2024

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 1, 2024

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 1, 2024

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 4, 2024

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 13, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

May 13, 2024

Status Verified

May 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

Same day

First QC Date

April 4, 2024

Last Update Submit

May 8, 2024

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

  • EDSS

    The EDSS ranges from 0 to 10 in 0.5 unit increments that represent higher levels of disability. In the lower part of its range, the EDSS score predominantly reflects the result of the examination by a neurologist, primarily a measure of impairment in eight functional systems (FS). In the middle part of its range, the EDSS score is primarily a measure of ambulation ability. At the higher end, upper limb and bulbar function as well as the ability to accomplish activities of daily living determine the score. The EDSS is considered to be an ordinal scale. The point estimates of the central tendency should be presented as median values and the measures of dispersion as interquartile ranges (Uitdehaag B, 2014). According to Havardova et al, MSJ 2017, the following disease severity groups can be distinguished: Mild EDSS 0-3 Moderate EDSS 4-6.5 Severe EDSS 7-9

    2 years

  • Functional tests

    Functional tests of upper limbs (9-HPT) and lower limbs (25FWT) are measured in seconds. Higher scores indicate a worse function. A 20% change of the scores is considered to be a reasonable cutoff value for reliably detecting a clinically meaningful change.

    2 years

  • Cognitive tests

    Cognitive screening tests include the PASAT (till 2015) and the SDMT (since 2015). The results are corresponding to the number of correct answers in a fixed time frame. Higher scores indicate a better function. The tests were usually performed on a yearly basis to limit learning effects.

    2 years

  • The EQ-Visual Analog Score (EQ-VAS)

    The EQ-Visual Analog Score (EQ-VAS) records the patient's self-rated health on a vertical visual analogue scale, a kind of 'thermometer' where the endpoints are labelled 'The best health you can image' (endpoint 100 at the top) and 'The worst health you can image' (endpoint 0 at the bottom). The patient is asked to draw a line from the box marked 'Your health status today' to the appropriate point on the 'thermometer' scale. The VAS can be used as a quantitative measure of health outcome that reflects the patient's own judgement. The 5-level EQ-5D version (EQ-5D-5L) was introduced by the EuroQol Group in 2009 to improve the instrument's sensitivity and to reduce ceiling effects, as compared to the EQ-5D-3L. Five questions assessing five domains (mobility, self-care, usual activity, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression) are included. A single index value can be generated.

    2 years

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Multiple Sclerosis patients followed in the National MS center Belgium

You may qualify if:

  • diagnosis of MS needs to be based on diagnostic criteria valid at the time of data entry and confirmed during follow up

You may not qualify if:

  • Neuromyelitis Optica diagnosis, AQ4 positive or MOG positive

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Nationaal Multiple Sclerose Centrum Melsbroek

Melsbroek, Vlaams-Brabant, 1820, Belgium

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Multiple Sclerosis

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Demyelinating Autoimmune Diseases, CNSAutoimmune Diseases of the Nervous SystemNervous System DiseasesDemyelinating DiseasesAutoimmune DiseasesImmune System Diseases

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
OTHER
Time Perspective
RETROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Prof Dr D'hooghe

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 4, 2024

First Posted

May 13, 2024

Study Start

April 1, 2024

Primary Completion

April 1, 2024

Study Completion

April 1, 2024

Last Updated

May 13, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-05

Locations