Accuracy of Motor Performance Perception in Multiple Sclerosis
Assessment of Perceptive Accuracy for Motor Performance in Persons With Multiple Sclerosis
1 other identifier
observational
88
1 country
3
Brief Summary
The aim of this study is to characterize perceptive abilities in PwMS compared to controls when performing prolonged functional tasks such as walking and repeated standing from a seated position. This study proposes primary and secondary research questions which will be tested in the context of two different newly designed experimental tasks and will be performed in maximum three days. The self-reported beliefs over perceptive abilities and the performance in the experimental perceptive tasks will be compared between persons with multiple sclerosis and an equally sized group of age and gender matched healthy controls. The results of this study may uncover specific deficits in the MS population and will help in defining subgroups of patients with weaker perceptive capacities to gauge their motor performance and therefore in need for tailored interventions additional to the standard practice.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Dec 2024
Shorter than P25 for all trials
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 9, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 19, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 16, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 16, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 9, 2025
CompletedNovember 19, 2025
September 1, 2025
10 months
August 19, 2025
November 18, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Perceptive Sensitivity
Ratio between participants' reporting frequency and actual variability in motor performance (e.g., gait and sit-to-stand \[STS\]), referred to as the 'Detection-rate.' Number of pinches is divided by the Coefficient of Variability (in %, of speed or smoothness parameter) in the studied time-window.
Day 1
Detection Accuracy
Accuracy of detecting naturally occurring variations in self-paced gait and sit-to-stand (STS) performance. Objective change points (events) in speed/smoothness are identified using peak detection algorithms with a predefined threshold to extract only perceptually meaningful speed/smoothness fluctuations. Participants indicate perceived changes using a pinch gesture. A response is classified as correct if it occurs within a ±2-second window of a detected event. Responses outside this window or unmatched with any event are incorrect. Perceptive accuracy is modeled as a binary variable (correct/incorrect) and analyzed using mixed-effects logistic regression to account for repeated measures within subjects.
Day 1
Correspondence Accuracy
Intra-subject correlation between perceived and actual imposed variations in walking speed or seat height, across different difficulty levels. Pearson correlations will study the linear relationship between the exercise difficulty and the reported difficulty. A Fisher Z transformation is carried out on all correlations before further analysis (group level comparisons across participants). -Detailed Picture of Each Phase: Average exercise difficulty and reported difficulty are calculated for every 30 s (or 3 STS repetitions). Multiple mixed model analyses are performed on the phases separately, with exercise difficulty and reported difficulty as dependent variables in separate analyses. Group (patient versus controls) and time are used as independent variables in all analyses. To control for potential baseline differences in any of the outcome variables exercise and reported difficulty in the last 30 s of the baseline phase are added as covariates in the analyses.
Day 2
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Confidence Rating
Day 1 and 2
Perceptive Awareness
Day 1 and 2
Interoceptive Sensibility
Day 1
Proprioceptive Sensibility
Day 1
Interoceptive Sensitivity and Attention Questionnaire (ISAQ)
Day 1
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (28)
Visual Analogic Scale for Fatigue
Day 1 and 2
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)
Day 1
Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS)
Day 1
- +25 more other outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Subjects with Multiple Sclerosis
Inclusion criteria: Age between 18 and 70 years old; a diagnosis of MS (2017 revisions of the McDonalds criteria); ability to walk for 6 minutes without rest and without the need of a walking aid; ability to repeatedly perform the sit to stand transitions on a standard chair (43cm seat height) without hand support. Additionally, no relapses \>1 month preceding the start of the study. Exclusion criteria: cognitive impairment hindering understanding of study instructions, pregnancy, and musculoskeletal disorders in the lower limbs (not related to MS), cardiovascular red flags for exercise (screened with Physical Activity Readines Questionnaire), other diagnosis for neurological or metabolic disease limiting the full execution of the tests (eg. peripheral neuropathy altering the foot plantar sensibility).
Healthy Controls
Age and sex matching is ensured within a five-year range per Healthy Contol. Exclusion criteria: cognitive impairment hindering understanding of study instructions, pregnancy, and musculoskeletal disorders in the lower limbs, cardiovascular red flags for exercise (screened with Physical Activity Readines Questionnaire), other diagnosis for neurological or metabolic disease limiting the full execution of the tests (eg. peripheral neuropathy altering the foot plantar sensibility).
Eligibility Criteria
44 PwMS and 44 healthy controls will be recruited from the Flemish MS rehabilitation centers in Melsbroek (NMSC) and Pelt (Noorderhart RMSC), and as well from the REVAL research center in UHasselt. No economical compensation will be provided. We will search age and sex-matching healthy controls, considering a 5-year range per subject. After giving informed consent, demographics of age and gender, height and weight, years of education, as well as MS-related information such as EDSS, type of MS, use of assistive device for walking in daily life, and year of diagnosis, will be collected and provided by the centers or via self-report. The participants will be instructed to keep their normal routine but to avoid extraneous physical activity at least 24 hours before the data collection session.
You may qualify if:
- age between 18 and 70 years old
- ability to walk for 6 minutes without rest and without the need of a walking aid
- ability to repeatedly perform the sit to stand transitions on a standard chair (43cm seat height) without hand support
- For People with Multiple Sclerosis group
- a diagnosis of MS (2017 revisions of the McDonalds criteria)
- no disease relapses \>1 month preceding the start of the study
You may not qualify if:
- cognitive impairment hindering understanding of study instructions
- ongoing or suspected pregnancy
- musculoskeletal disorders in the lower limbs
- cardiovascular red flags for exercise (screened with Physical Activity Readines Questionnaire)
- other diagnosis for neurological or metabolic disease limiting the full execution of the tests
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Hasselt Universitylead
- Revalidatie & MS Centrum Overpeltcollaborator
- National MS Center Melsbroekcollaborator
Study Sites (3)
REVAL
Diepenbeek, Belgium, 3590, Belgium
Noorderhart Revalidatie & MS
Overpelt, Belgium, 3900, Belgium
Nationaal MS-Centrum Melsbroek
Steenokkerzeel, Belgium, 1820, Belgium
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE CONTROL
- Time Perspective
- CROSS SECTIONAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Prof. dr.
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 19, 2025
First Posted
September 16, 2025
Study Start
December 9, 2024
Primary Completion
October 16, 2025
Study Completion
December 9, 2025
Last Updated
November 19, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-09