Impact of a Mock-up Fact-checking Extension on HPV Vaccine Misinformation: A Survey Experiment
Evaluating the Feasibility and Effectiveness of a Mock-up Fact-checking Extension to Improve Ability to Debunk HPV Vaccine Misinformation Among Parents of Middle School Girls: A Survey Experiment
1 other identifier
interventional
1,200
1 country
2
Brief Summary
The primary objective of this survey experiment study is to measure the impact of a mock-up Chinese fact-checking extension on the ability to dispel HPV and HPV vaccine-related misinformation among parents of middle school girls in China.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Apr 2024
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 26, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 28, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 8, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 31, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 30, 2024
CompletedMay 8, 2024
May 1, 2024
1 month
April 26, 2024
May 3, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Ability to debunk misinformation
This outcome measures participants' ability to debunk misinformation about the HPV or HPV vaccine. Total debunking scores range from 0 to 10, with higher scores reflecting better debunking skills.
Day 1, in a single survey
Secondary Outcomes (4)
HPV vaccination intention
Day 1, in a single survey
HPV vaccine confidence
Day 1, in a single survey
Tool acceptance
Day 1, in a single survey
User experience of mock-up fact-checking extension
Day 1, in a single survey
Study Arms (2)
Mock-up fact-checking extension intervention group
EXPERIMENTALIntervention group participants will engage with three modules: In Module 1, participants will examine six Weibo post screenshots, each featuring a mock-up of a Chinese fact-checking extension. Participants in the intervention group will assess a statement linked to the content of each post, which aligns with predefined HPV vaccine knowledge from section (b). Their response options will be: 1) Correct, 2) Incorrect, or 3) I don't know, taking into account both the post and the extension's feedback. In the module 2, participants will review four additional Weibo post screenshots, two of which include false information. Responses will follow the same format used in Module 1. In Module 3, participants will choose whether to view Weibo post screenshots with the fact-checking extension enabled or disabled. If they choose "Yes", the screenshot will be displayed with the extension; if "No", it will be shown without the extension.
Control group
NO INTERVENTIONControl group participants will participate in three modules: In Modules 1 and 2, they will review six and four Weibo post screenshots, respectively, without the mock-up Chinese fact-checking extension. Participants will evaluate statements linked to the content of each post, aligning with predefined HPV vaccine knowledge from section (b). Their response options will be: 1) Correct, 2) Incorrect, or 3) I don't know, based solely on the content of the posts. In Module 3, participants will choose whether to view Weibo post screenshots with the fact-checking extension enabled or disabled. If they choose "Yes", the screenshot will be displayed with the extension; if "No", it will be shown without the extension.
Interventions
The intervention in this survey experiment involves mobile Weibo post screenshots equipped with a mock-up Chinese fact-checking browser extension. All screenshots are based on actual Weibo posts. The fact-checking content is generated by a Large Language Model (LLM), tailored to relevant knowledge and prompts, and subsequently validated by experts. The Weibo posts cover a range of popular topics known to contain misinformation, including infertility, safety, vaccine ingredients, high-risk cervical cancer types, regular check-ups, transmission routes, and others.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Participants must be parents or legal guardians of female students currently enrolled in participating middle school.
- The parent's or guardian's female middle school student must not have received the HPV vaccine, must not have an HPV vaccination appointment scheduled, and must not have any contraindications to receiving the HPV vaccine.
- Participants must be free of mental health disorders or visual/reading disabilities that could prevent their full participation in and completion of the intervention activities.
- Participants must have provided informed consent and expressed a willingness to actively participate throughout the study.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Fudan Universitylead
- The University of Hong Kongcollaborator
Study Sites (2)
Chizhou Health Center for Disease Control and Prevention
Chizhou, Anhui, 247100, China
Jiading District Center for Disease Control and Prevention
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, 201800, China
Related Publications (17)
Lee KY, Dabak SV, Kong VH, Park M, Kwok SLL, Silzle M, Rachatan C, Cook A, Passanante A, Pertwee E, Wu Z, Elkin JA, Larson HJ, Lau EHY, Leung K, Wu JT, Lin L. Effectiveness of chatbots on COVID vaccine confidence and acceptance in Thailand, Hong Kong, and Singapore. NPJ Digit Med. 2023 May 25;6(1):96. doi: 10.1038/s41746-023-00843-6.
PMID: 37231110BACKGROUNDHuang S, Yang J, Fong S, Zhao Q. Artificial intelligence in the diagnosis of COVID-19: challenges and perspectives. Int J Biol Sci. 2021 Apr 10;17(6):1581-1587. doi: 10.7150/ijbs.58855. eCollection 2021.
PMID: 33907522BACKGROUNDScherer LD, McPhetres J, Pennycook G, Kempe A, Allen LA, Knoepke CE, Tate CE, Matlock DD. Who is susceptible to online health misinformation? A test of four psychosocial hypotheses. Health Psychol. 2021 Apr;40(4):274-284. doi: 10.1037/hea0000978. Epub 2021 Mar 1.
PMID: 33646806BACKGROUNDBin Naeem S, Kamel Boulos MN. COVID-19 Misinformation Online and Health Literacy: A Brief Overview. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 30;18(15):8091. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18158091.
PMID: 34360384BACKGROUNDSouthwick L, Guntuku SC, Klinger EV, Seltzer E, McCalpin HJ, Merchant RM. Characterizing COVID-19 Content Posted to TikTok: Public Sentiment and Response During the First Phase of the COVID-19 Pandemic. J Adolesc Health. 2021 Aug;69(2):234-241. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2021.05.010. Epub 2021 Jun 22.
PMID: 34167883BACKGROUNDTangcharoensathien V, Calleja N, Nguyen T, Purnat T, D'Agostino M, Garcia-Saiso S, Landry M, Rashidian A, Hamilton C, AbdAllah A, Ghiga I, Hill A, Hougendobler D, van Andel J, Nunn M, Brooks I, Sacco PL, De Domenico M, Mai P, Gruzd A, Alaphilippe A, Briand S. Framework for Managing the COVID-19 Infodemic: Methods and Results of an Online, Crowdsourced WHO Technical Consultation. J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jun 26;22(6):e19659. doi: 10.2196/19659.
PMID: 32558655BACKGROUNDNorman CD, Skinner HA. eHealth Literacy: Essential Skills for Consumer Health in a Networked World. J Med Internet Res. 2006 Jun 16;8(2):e9. doi: 10.2196/jmir.8.2.e9.
PMID: 16867972BACKGROUNDHu D, Martin C, Dredze M, Broniatowski DA. Chinese social media suggest decreased vaccine acceptance in China: An observational study on Weibo following the 2018 Changchun Changsheng vaccine incident. Vaccine. 2020 Mar 17;38(13):2764-2770. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.02.027. Epub 2020 Feb 22.
PMID: 32093982BACKGROUNDChen L, Wang X, Peng TQ. Nature and Diffusion of Gynecologic Cancer-Related Misinformation on Social Media: Analysis of Tweets. J Med Internet Res. 2018 Oct 16;20(10):e11515. doi: 10.2196/11515.
PMID: 30327289BACKGROUNDKeelan J, Pavri V, Balakrishnan R, Wilson K. An analysis of the Human Papilloma Virus vaccine debate on MySpace blogs. Vaccine. 2010 Feb 10;28(6):1535-40. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.11.060. Epub 2009 Dec 8.
PMID: 20003922BACKGROUNDZimet GD, Rosberger Z, Fisher WA, Perez S, Stupiansky NW. Beliefs, behaviors and HPV vaccine: correcting the myths and the misinformation. Prev Med. 2013 Nov;57(5):414-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2013.05.013. Epub 2013 May 31.
PMID: 23732252BACKGROUNDHuang Y, Xu S, Xu Y, Yao D, Wang L, Zhao Y, Wu Q. A New Strategy for Cervical Cancer Prevention Among Chinese Women: How Much Do They Know and How Do They React Toward the HPV Immunization? J Cancer Educ. 2021 Apr;36(2):386-394. doi: 10.1007/s13187-019-01642-y.
PMID: 31902089BACKGROUNDZhang Y, Wang Y, Liu L, Fan Y, Liu Z, Wang Y, Nie S. Awareness and knowledge about human papillomavirus vaccination and its acceptance in China: a meta-analysis of 58 observational studies. BMC Public Health. 2016 Mar 3;16:216. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-2873-8.
PMID: 26936076BACKGROUNDLi K, Li Q, Song L, Wang D, Yin R. The distribution and prevalence of human papillomavirus in women in mainland China. Cancer. 2019 Apr 1;125(7):1030-1037. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32003. Epub 2019 Feb 12.
PMID: 30748006BACKGROUNDLi C, Wu M, Wang J, Zhang S, Zhu L, Pan J, Zhang W. A population-based study on the risks of cervical lesion and human papillomavirus infection among women in Beijing, People's Republic of China. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2010 Oct;19(10):2655-64. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-10-0212. Epub 2010 Aug 18.
PMID: 20719907BACKGROUNDZhao FH, Lin MJ, Chen F, Hu SY, Zhang R, Belinson JL, Sellors JW, Franceschi S, Qiao YL, Castle PE; Cervical Cancer Screening Group in China. Performance of high-risk human papillomavirus DNA testing as a primary screen for cervical cancer: a pooled analysis of individual patient data from 17 population-based studies from China. Lancet Oncol. 2010 Dec;11(12):1160-71. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70256-4. Epub 2010 Nov 11.
PMID: 21075054BACKGROUNDLi X, Xiang F, Dai J, Zhang T, Chen Z, Zhang M, Wu R, Kang X. Prevalence of cervicovaginal human papillomavirus infection and genotype distribution in Shanghai, China. Virol J. 2022 Sep 12;19(1):146. doi: 10.1186/s12985-022-01879-y.
PMID: 36096810BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Zhiyuan Hou, PhD
Fudan University
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Leesa Lin, PhD
The University of Hong Kong
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 26, 2024
First Posted
May 8, 2024
Study Start
April 28, 2024
Primary Completion
May 31, 2024
Study Completion
June 30, 2024
Last Updated
May 8, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL
- Time Frame
- Beginning 12 months and ending 36 months following article publication
- Access Criteria
- Researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal for meta analysis. Proposals should be directed to zyhou@fudan.edu.cn; to gain access, data requestors will need to sign a data access agreement.
Individual participant data that underlie the results reported in the article, after de-identification (text, tables, figures, and appendices), will be shared upon reasonable requests. A written data-sharing request for meta-analysis should be submitted by email with a methodologically sound proposal. Proposals should be directed to zyhou@fudan.edu.cn; to gain access, data requestors will need to sign a data access agreement.