CBCT-based Assessment of Apical Root Resorption and Alveolar Bone Height Following Orthodontic Treatment of Moderate Crowding With Labial vs. Lingual Fixed Appliances: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Sponsor study identifier
interventional
40
1 country
1
Study Start
March 10, 2022
Actual (reported)Primary Completion
June 15, 2022
Actual (reported)Study Completion
September 15, 2023
Actual (reported)Patients who have moderate crowding that could be treated on a non-extraction will be treated in this study. The apical root resorption and alveolar bone height of the lingual and labial fixed appliances will be assessed. All patients will receive a cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scan at two different times (T0: Before treatment, T1: After treatment). There are two groups: The first group (Experimental): The patients in this group will be treated using Lingual Fixed Orthodontic Appliances. The second group (Control): The patients in this group will be treated using Labial Fixed Orthodontic Appliances.
Registry-reported information. Elapsed time and enrollment totals alone do not measure study progress or recruitment pace.
September 15, 2023
Actual (reported)Click on a node to explore related trials.
Some registry-reported names shown below are not yet linked in this graph.
Dates and qualifiers reported by the registry. Estimated dates do not confirm that a milestone has occurred.
March 10, 2022
Actual (reported)June 15, 2022
Actual (reported)September 15, 2023
Actual (reported)May 2, 2024
Actual (reported)May 6, 2024
Actual (reported)Change in tooth lengths
Axial, coronal, and sagittal planes of the CBCT images will be reoriented to be perpendicular to the long axis of each tooth under assessment. The distances were measured as follows. Central and lateral incisors: from incisal edge to apex (sagittal section). Canines: from cusp tip to apex (sagittal section). Single-rooted premolar: from vestibular cusp tip to apex (sagittal section). Two-rooted premolar: from vestibular cusp tip to apex (sagittal section) and lingual cusp tip to apex (coronal section). Upper molars: from the mesiolingual cusp tip to the apex of the lingual root of the molar (coronal section), from the mesobuccal cusp tip to the apex of the mesobuccal root of the molar (sagittal section), from distobuccal cusp tip to the apex of distobuccal root of molar (sagittal section).
T0: one day before the commencement of treatment. T1: one day following the end of treatment
Change in the alveolar bone height
The CBCT images were redirected according to the long axis of each tooth as given previously. The distance between the cementoenamel junction and the crest of the alveolar bone was measured in the sagittal plane for central and lateral incisors, while in the coronal plane for canines. For the premolars and first molars, the distance between the cementoenamel junction and the crest of the alveolar bone was measured in the coronal plane.
T0: one day before the commencement of treatment. T1: one day following the end of treatment
This group received treatment with lingual brackets with 0.018-inch slots (DTC Orthodontics, Hangzhou, China) applied with the aid of a special, indirect bonding technique, the "Modified HIRO® Technique." Individual lingual archwires (Forestadent®, Germany) were also used.
Patients in this group received treatment with labial appliances with 0.018-inch slots (American Orthodontics brackets, Mini Master series, MBT prescription) directly bonded on both arches. Prefabricated archwires (American Orthodontics, Sheboygan, WI, USA) were also used.
These brackets will be used on the lingual surfaces of the upper and lower teeth.
These brackets will be used on the vestibular surfaces of the upper and lower teeth.
Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Damsacus
Damascus, DM20 HAJ72, Syria
Khattab TZ, Farah H, Al-Sabbagh R, Hajeer MY, Haj-Hamed Y. Speech performance and oral impairments with lingual and labial orthodontic appliances in the first stage of fixed treatment. Angle Orthod. 2013 May;83(3):519-26. doi: 10.2319/073112-619.1. Epub 2012 Oct 18.
Kara-Boulad JM, Burhan AS, Hajeer MY, Khattab TZ, Nawaya FR. Evaluation of the Oral Health-Related Quality of Life (OHRQoL) in Patients Undergoing Lingual Versus Labial Fixed Orthodontic Appliances: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. Cureus. 2022 Mar 22;14(3):e23379. doi: 10.7759/cureus.23379. eCollection 2022 Mar.
Jehad M. Kara-Boulad, DDS MSc PhD
Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Damascus University, Damascus, Syria
Ahmad S. Burhan, DDS MSc PhD
Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Damascus University
40 participants (actual enrollment reported by the registry).
First Submitted
May 2, 2024
First Posted
May 6, 2024
Study Start
March 10, 2022
Actual (reported)Registry-reported names are shown in full. Names without a link have not yet been matched to a Syfrah profile.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Nassif CE, Cotrim-Ferreira A, Conti ACCF, Valarelli DP, de Almeida Cardoso M, de Almeida-Pedrin RR. Comparative study of root resorption of maxillary incisors in patients treated with lingual and buccal orthodontics. Angle Orthod. 2017 Nov;87(6):795-800. doi: 10.2319/041117-247.1. Epub 2017 Jul 24.
Hajeer MY, Al-Homsi HK, Alfailany DT, Murad RMT. Evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy of CBCT-based interpretations of maxillary impacted canines compared to those of conventional radiography: An in vitro study. Int Orthod. 2022 Jun;20(2):100639. doi: 10.1016/j.ortho.2022.100639. Epub 2022 May 21.
Alfailany DT, Shaweesh AI, Hajeer MY, Brad B, Alhaffar JB. The diagnostic accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography and two-dimensional imaging methods in the 3D localization and assessment of maxillary impacted canines compared to the gold standard in-vivo readings: A cross-sectional study. Int Orthod. 2023 Sep;21(3):100780. doi: 10.1016/j.ortho.2023.100780. Epub 2023 Jun 6.
Kara-Boulad JM, Burhan AS, Hajeer MY, Khattab TZ, Nawaya FR, Al-Sabbagh R. Treatment of Moderately Crowded Teeth Using Lingual Fixed Appliance Prepared by a Modified HIRO(R) Technique: A Case Report and Method Description. Cureus. 2022 May 17;14(5):e25077. doi: 10.7759/cureus.25077. eCollection 2022 May.
Primary Completion
June 15, 2022
Actual (reported)Study Completion
September 15, 2023
Actual (reported)Last Updated
May 6, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-05
Download the complete ClinicalTrials.gov record imported by Syfrah, including fields not shown in this page. The registry may contain a newer revision.
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov.
JSON downloads include source attribution and retrieval details alongside the unchanged original record or the separately normalized values.
Source retrieved: