Efficiency, Efficacy, Periodontal & Occlusal Outcomes for Aligners Versus Fixed Orthodontic Appliances in Crowded Incisor Treatment
1 other identifier
interventional
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare between fixed labial braces and clear aligners for the straightening of moderately overlapped lower front teeth. The main questions it aims to answer are:
- Effect of treatment on gum health
- Which treatment achieves lower front teeth alignment faster in terms of alignment time and t number of visits required to the orthodontist
- How well it straightens teeth. Participants will:
- Receive either labial braces or clear aligners as part of their orthodontic treatment.
- Come for regular follow-up visits every 4 to 6 weeks with the orthodontist till full straightening of the lower front teeth.
- Have a 3D scan of their teeth taken after their teeth are aligned along with a specialized x-ray of their head and jaw.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2023
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 16, 2023
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 31, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 12, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2028
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2028
May 5, 2026
April 1, 2026
5.1 years
October 31, 2024
April 28, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (9)
Total alignment time
The duration of treatment time (rounded to the nearest day) required to achieve full alignment of the mandibular incisors determined clinically as \<1mm little's irregularity index, evaluated for both treatment groups. This information is to be extracted from participant notes into a data collection sheet designed specifically for this study.
Through alignment, an average of 6 months
Bleeding on probing
Bleeding on probing as an indicator of tissue inflammatory response to bacterial pathogensis, using the Michigan Williams probe assigned a score of 0 - 3 for each site.
Baseline, after 3 months, and after 6 months
Occlusal contact surface area
Occlusal contact surface area as measured by the T-scan device in terms of no. of pixels
Baseline, and after an average of 6 months, and after treatment an average of 1 year
Efficacy of clear aligners Vs fixed appliances in alignment of lower anterior teeth
Efficacy of clear aligners Vs fixed appliances in alignment of lower anterior teeth using Little's irregularity index
Baseline, and after an average of 6 months
Symmetry of contact distribution
Symmetry of contact distribution as measured by the T-scan device.
Baseline, and after an average of 6 months
Probing depth
The distance measured from the base of the pocket to the most apical point on the gingival margin using the Michigan Williams probe.
Baseline, after 3 months, and after 6 months
Plaque index
Plaque index to evaluate the level and rate of plaque formation on tooth surfaces
Baseline, after 3 months, and after 6 months
Gingival index
Gingival index to determine the severity of gingival inflammation with a score from 0 - 3
Baseline, after 3 months, and after 6 months
Total treatment time
The duration of treatment time (rounded to the nearest day) required to complete treatment, evaluated for both treatment groups. This information is to be extracted from participant notes into a data collection sheet designed specifically for this study.
Through treatment, an average of 1 year
Secondary Outcomes (11)
Total number of scheduled routine appointments and additional emergency visits
Through alignment, an average of 6 months
Missed appointment rate
Through alignment, an average of 6 months
Number of refinements
Through alignment, an average of 6 months
Bracket/ attachment failure rate
Through alignment, an average of 6 months
Chair side time
Through alignment, an average of 6 months
- +6 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Fixed labial braces group
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants in this group will be treated with pre-adjusted fixed orthodontic appliances.
Clear aligner group
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants in this group will receive clear aligners customized based on a digital model of each patient's dentition.
Interventions
Participants in this group will receive clear aligners (EON Aligner, Minneapolis), designed and customized based on a digital model of each patient's dental structure. Aligners will be worn for at least 22 hours daily, and patients will change to a new aligner depending on treatment progress.
Participants in this group will be treated with pre-adjusted fixed orthodontic appliances (Master Series®, American Orthodontics™, WI, USA). This system includes fixed brackets bonded on the labial surface of teeth and a sequence of progressively larger arch wires aimed at achieving alignment over time.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients with moderate lower crowding (Little's 4 to 6 mm), non-extraction treatment
- Age range: 13-45 years old
- Class I malocclusion
- Full permanent dentition
- No caries or periodontal disease
You may not qualify if:
- Extraction cases
- Patients with craniofacial syndromes, or cleft palate
- Patients with uncontrolled medical conditions or taking medication that can interfere with orthodontic tooth movement.
- Presence of extensive dental restorations in proximity to the gingival margin
- Presence of fixed bridges/crowns or partial dentures
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University Dental Hospital Sharjah (UDHS_
Sharjah city, Emirate of Sharjah, 27272, United Arab Emirates
Related Publications (1)
Buschang PH, Shaw SG, Ross M, Crosby D, Campbell PM. Comparative time efficiency of aligner therapy and conventional edgewise braces. Angle Orthod. 2014 May;84(3):391-6. doi: 10.2319/062113-466. Epub 2013 Nov 18.
PMID: 24749702RESULT
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Mais Medhat Sadek, BDS, MSc, PHD, Morth(RCSEd)
University of Sharjah
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 31, 2024
First Posted
December 12, 2024
Study Start
October 16, 2023
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2028
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2028
Last Updated
May 5, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR
- Time Frame
- IPD will be available once the trial is finalized up to 3 years post recruitment
- Access Criteria
- Principle investigator and researchers will have access to all IPD collected throughout the trial once it has been depersonalized.
All IPD collected throughout the trial