NCT06398197

Brief Summary

The purpose of the research study is to learn more about the best ways to teach cooking and food skills to adults, and how cooking classes may help reduce one's stress and food waste, as well as improve their diet.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
26

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2024

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 26, 2024

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 3, 2024

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 25, 2024

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 17, 2024

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 17, 2024

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

February 10, 2026

Completed
Last Updated

February 10, 2026

Status Verified

January 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

5 months

First QC Date

April 26, 2024

Results QC Date

December 17, 2025

Last Update Submit

January 23, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

Food LiteracyCooking Skills

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Food Waste Volume

    Food waste volume will be measured in grams using a study-provided food scale and waste log. Participants are asked to weigh discarded food and log the weight in a food waste tracking notebook for a period of 1 week prior to randomization at Baseline, and again for a period of 1 week at 10 weeks post-randomization. The outcome measure will use the difference in total volume of food waste between the two time points (post total food waste - pre total food waste).

    Change from Baseline to 10 weeks post-randomization

Study Arms (2)

Immediate Treatment Group

EXPERIMENTAL

Subjects first participate in 8 weekly cooking classes immediately after baseline data collection ends.

Behavioral: cooking and food skills intervention

Delayed intervention control group

NO INTERVENTION

Subjects receive no intervention for 9 weeks, serving as the control group. Once all data collection is complete, the delayed intervention control group will receive the intervention (8 weekly cooking classes)

Interventions

Participants will attend a weekly in-person class with brief instructional video clips, hands-on cooking and tasting experiences. Participants will work individually and as part of small groups during instructional sessions. At the end of each class, participants will receive a grocery bundle and a kitchen gadget that serves both as an incentive and implementation support to promote improved cooking frequency and confidence. Participants will be asked to post photos of what they made with their groceries to an instant messaging software (GroupMe application) and be encouraged to engage with fellow classmates on GroupMe to encourage social support of cooking. The intervention ends after the 8, weekly classes conclude (8 weeks total intervention time)

Also known as: Nourish
Immediate Treatment Group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Age 18 and over
  • Ability to attend classes in person

You may not qualify if:

  • Non-English speaking

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Community Recruitment

Cleveland, Ohio, 44118, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Cooking

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Food HandlingFood IndustryIndustryTechnology, Industry, and Agriculture

Limitations and Caveats

The primary outcome could not be analyzed for all participants. As a feasibility pilot, technical problems with measurement led to unreliable or uninterpretable data. In addition, there was a high amount of missing data. The small sample limits generalizability, and no conclusions about effectiveness can be drawn. Insights will guide methodological changes to reduce participant measurement burden and data collection errors.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Melissa Prescott
Organization
Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine

Study Officials

  • Melissa Prescott, PhD

    Case Western Reserve University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Brenna Ellison, PhD

    Purdue University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 26, 2024

First Posted

May 3, 2024

Study Start

July 25, 2024

Primary Completion

December 17, 2024

Study Completion

December 17, 2024

Last Updated

February 10, 2026

Results First Posted

February 10, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-01

Locations