Patient's Informational Privacy in Prehospital Emergency Care - Educational Intervention Study for the Paramedics
1 other identifier
interventional
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The main goal of this educational intervention study about patient's informational privacy (IP) is to evaluate the effect of the educational intervention into the paramedics' knowledge and attitude regarding patient's IP. The study also investigates the usability and the feasibility of the educational intervention. The main questions it aims to answer are:
- 1.What is the effect of the educational intervention on the
- 2.theoretical knowledge of paramedics' regarding IP?
- 3.the paramedics' attitude towards patient's IP?
- 4.What is the usability and feasibility of the intervention being evaluated according to the respondents?
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2024
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 25, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 19, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 29, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 19, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 16, 2024
CompletedJune 18, 2024
June 1, 2024
2 months
April 19, 2024
June 17, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Paramedics' knowledge about patient's informational privacy
The possible change in paramedics' knowledge about patient's informational privacy (IP) will be evaluated by comparing the results from the first and second (after intervention) measurements from the both groups (experiment and control) by using the KAPIP (Knowledge and attitude towards patients' informational privacy) instrument developed for this research. It contains background factors and three separate sections. Sections I and II are providing the results for the main outcome: I) Subjective theoretical knowledge - paramedics' self-assessment of their knowledge about IP. Scaling from 1-5 (very poor, poor, fair, good, very good) II) Actual theoretical knowledge - knowledge test (objective evaluation regarding IP). Declarative sentences formed on true-or-false basis and with the option of I don't. The responses are scored as follows: In subjective and actual theoretical knowledge higher scores indicate higher level of knowledge: good, moderate, poor.
Measurements are conducted during two different time frame: first measurement before the educational intervention taking up to 4 weeks. Second measurement after educational intervention taking up to 4 weeks.
Secondary Outcomes (1)
paramedics' attitude towards patient's informational privacy.
Measurements are conducted during two different time frame: first measurement before the educational intervention taking up to 4 weeks. Second measurement after educational intervention taking up to 4 weeks.
Study Arms (2)
Intervention group
EXPERIMENTALReceives the educational intervention
control group
NO INTERVENTIONThe comparison group will not perform the educational intervention and will continue to work as normal standard according to their own organization's instructions.
Interventions
Educational intervention is a self-study, online course on Koulumaali platform about patient's informational privacy (IP) in prehospital emergency care (PEC). It comprises three separate educational modules approximately 30 min. long: module I) the meaning and significance of IP and its protection, module II) legislation regarding IP and its protection in healthcare and module III) breaches of IPand its protection in PEC. Each module contains theoretical sections as well as case-exercises and tests. Participants will have four weeks time to execute the entire course independently. Participants can execute the modules according to their own schedule. The modules need to be completed in certain order by following the numerical order from first to third. Only one of the modules is open at a time and the second module activates after the previous modules has been completed. Already completed modules become inactive.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Participating paramedic has a degree in healthcare or is in the process of completing a health care degree.
- Participating paramedics is working as an ALS (advanced life support) or BLS (basic life support) level paramedic in one of the two target rescue departments during the entire time of the data collection.
- Participant is capable to understand Finnish.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Eini Koskimieslead
Study Sites (1)
University of Turku
Turku, 20520, Finland
Related Publications (1)
Brooke, J. (2013). SUS: A Retrospective. Journal of Usability Studies, 8(2), 29- 40. Brooke, J. (1996). SUS: a 'quick and dirty' usability scale. In: Usability evaluation in industry (Jordan PW, Thomas B, Weerdmeester BA, McClelland AL ed.), Taylor and Francis, London, pp. 189- 194.
BACKGROUND
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Eini Koskimies, Doctoral researcher
University of Turku
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- BASIC SCIENCE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Doctoral reseacher
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 19, 2024
First Posted
April 29, 2024
Study Start
March 25, 2024
Primary Completion
May 19, 2024
Study Completion
June 16, 2024
Last Updated
June 18, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-06