NCT06361667

Brief Summary

Stratified randomised controlled trial with two arms: arts intervention (any of the arts interventions, see list), which we call here Active Group (AG) vs waitlist control (WL).

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
382

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2024

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 20, 2024

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 26, 2024

Completed
17 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 12, 2024

Completed
8 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 19, 2024

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 19, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

October 1, 2025

Status Verified

September 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

9 months

First QC Date

March 26, 2024

Last Update Submit

September 24, 2025

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • The Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale (WEMWBS)

    The Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale (WEMWBS). This tool was developed in order to measure mental wellbeing in the general population by Tennant et al. (2007). It consists of 14 items responding using a 5-point Likert scale from 1 (never) to 5 (all the time). The overall score is calculated by summing the responses for every item without reversing none. The minimum overall score ranges from 14 to 70. Higher scores indicate increased mental wellbeing. The scale has been widely used nationally and internationally for monitoring, evaluating projects and programmes and investigating the determinants of mental wellbeing. An efficient internal consistency was proven using Cronbach's alpha score which was 0.89 for the student sample and 0.91 for the general population sample. Also, test-retest reliability at one week was high (0.83). The Greek validation showed acceptable internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha score 0.90).

    3 months

  • The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)

    The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) is a questionnaire which measures depression and grade severity of symptoms in general medical and mental health settings using nine DSM-5 criteria for major depression within the last two weeks. PHQ-9 constructed by Kroenke et al. (2001) and validated in Greek by Hyphantis et al. (2011) is using a four-point Likert-type scale. After summing all responses (0=not at all, 3=nearly every day), scores range from 0 to 27, with higher levels indicating increased symptom severity (0-4 no to minimal; 5-9 mild; 10-14 moderate; 15-19 moderately severe; 20-27 severe). The internal reliability of the PHQ-9 was excellent, with a Cronbach's α of 0.89 in the PHQ Primary Care Study (Kroenke et al., 2001) and 0.82 in Greek validation (Hyphantis et al., 2011).

    3 months

  • Generalised Anxiety Disorder Assessment (GAD-7)

    The Generalised Anxiety Disorder Assessment (GAD-7) is provided to screen symptom severity for the four most common anxiety disorders (generalized anxiety disorder, panic disorder, social phobia and posttraumatic stress disorder). GAD-7 constructed by Spitzer et al (2006) and validated in Greek by Vogazianos et al (2022). It consists of 7 items. The GAD-7 score is computed by assigning scores of 0, 1, 2, and 3, to the response categories of 'not at all', 'several days', 'more than half the days', and 'nearly every day', respectively, and summing together the scores for the seven questions (scores range from 0 to 21). Higher levels indicate increased anxiety. There are cut-offs for severity of anxiety as: (i) score 0-4: Minimal Anxiety; (ii) score 5-9: Mild Anxiety; (iii) score 10-14: Moderate Anxiety; (iv) score greater than 15: Severe Anxiety. The internal consistency of the GAD-7 was excellent (Cronbach α = 0.92) (Spitzer et al., 2006).

    3 months

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • UCLA 3-item Loneliness Scale

    3 months

  • The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ)

    3 months

Study Arms (2)

Active Group (AG)

EXPERIMENTAL

This arm will receive the arts intervention (any of the arts interventions).

Other: Arts

Waitlist Control (WL)

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

This arm will be the waitlist control and after 3 months it will be active.

Other: Arts

Interventions

ArtsOTHER

Arts (music, cinema, dance).

Also known as: Art as Prescription Therapy
Active Group (AG)Waitlist Control (WL)

Eligibility Criteria

Age10 Years - 99 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • age range: 10-99 years
  • be able to communicate effectively in order to provide answers to questionnaires that he/she will be asked to complete
  • be able to commit to monitoring the action
  • be able to participate in the activity alone (unaccompanied, without a carer),
  • be able to answer the questionnaires
  • to have legal capacity

You may not qualify if:

  • active dependency,
  • patients that are not consistent in following pharmaceutical drugs,
  • patients from different Patient Association which is not "affiliated" with a Mental Health Professional Therapist.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Eleni Kavadia

Athens, Greece

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Anxiety DisordersDepressive DisorderSchizophreniaAutistic Disorder

Interventions

Reproductive Techniques, Assisted

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Mental DisordersMood DisordersSchizophrenia Spectrum and Other Psychotic DisordersAutism Spectrum DisorderChild Development Disorders, PervasiveNeurodevelopmental Disorders

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Reproductive TechniquesTherapeuticsInvestigative Techniques

Study Officials

  • Nikos Stefanis, PhD

    University Mental Health Research Institute, Athens, Greece

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: We will follow standard practice for RCTs and apply an ANCOVA model to estimate the effects of treatment. The formalism is: y \~ b0 + b1xtreatment\_group + b2xtime + b3xtreatment\_groupxtime + covariates (1) Where, y is each outcome, b1-b3 are the regression coefficients and covariates denotes covariates at randomisation (DETERMINE) The inference of interest for the model concerns b3, the interaction term, as we posit that there will be a difference in slopes between the treatment groups. The inference is going to happen via an estimation of the t-statistic, defined as follows" t = b3/SE (2) Where SE is the standard error for coefficient b3 t \> 1.96 (3) And 1.96 is the critical value for statistical significance at alpha = 0.05.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Executive Secretariat

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 26, 2024

First Posted

April 12, 2024

Study Start

March 20, 2024

Primary Completion

December 19, 2024

Study Completion

December 19, 2024

Last Updated

October 1, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-09

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations