The Unified Protocol for the Treatment of Emotional Disorders in Spanish Public Mental Health System
Cost-efficacy and Acceptability of the Unified Protocol for the Treatment of Emotional Disorders in the Spanish Public Mental Health System Using a Group Format
1 other identifier
interventional
200
1 country
3
Brief Summary
The present randomized, controlled trial will compare the cost-efficacy and acceptability of the Unified Protocol in group format against traditional individual Cognitive Behavioral Treatment in a sample of patients with emotional disorders. Ultimately, the goal of the current study is to explore whether the Unified Protocol in group format can be a cost-effective psychological intervention for emotional disorders in the Spanish National Health System, that is, one that generates long-lasting changes in symptoms, while reducing both direct and indirect economic costs associated with the treatment of emotional disorders.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Sep 2014
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 14, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 22, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 27, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 30, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 30, 2021
CompletedJune 18, 2020
June 1, 2020
7 years
February 22, 2017
June 17, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Change in the severity of depressive symptoms
The Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II) is a largely used measure that evaluates depressive symptomatology. It consists of 21 items, each including a set of four different sentences that reflect an increasing degree of depression. Responses are obtained through a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (lowest degree of depressive symptomatology) to 3 (most severe symptomatology). Scores in the BDI-II range from 0 to 63. The alpha coefficient obtained in the Spanish version (.87) indicates a good internal consistency.
Up to 12 months
Change in the severity of anxiety symptoms
The Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) is a frequently used measure of the severity of anxiety symptoms. The BAI includes 21 items. Each item reflects an anxiety symptom and respondents are asked to rate the extent to which the symptoms affected them during the past week. Responses are obtained through a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 0 = not at all to 3 = severely. Total score ranges from 0 to 63. The internal consistency estimate for the Spanish version of the BAI is high (.93).
Up to 12 months
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Change in quality of life
Up to 12 months
Change in the general tendency to worry
Up to 12 months
Change in obsessions and compulsions
Up to 12 months
Change in the severity of panic symptoms
Up to 12 months
Change in agoraphobia severity
Up to 12 months
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Unified Protocol (UP)
EXPERIMENTALInvestigators in the present study have adapted the UP to implement it in group format in a Public Mental Health setting in Spain. This adaptation is composed of 12 treatment sessions of two hours of duration each, at a rate of one per week. Participants in the UP will receive UP treatment in group format instead of the usual Cognitive Behavioral Therapy in individual format. Patients in the UP condition will receive pharmacological treatment (i.e., antidepressants and / or anxiolytics) as usual.
Treatment As Usual (TAU)
ACTIVE COMPARATORCognitive Behavioral Therapy in individual format is the treatment of choice (TAU) by psychologists and psychiatrists at the collaborating Public Mental Health Centers and Primary Care Centers, together with pharmacological treatment (i.e., antidepressants and / or anxiolytics).
Interventions
Intervention group that carries out the Unified Protocol in a group format
TAU group that carries out Cognitive Behavioral Therapy in an individual format
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Anxiety or mood disorder is the main diagnosis
- The patient is over 18 years of age
- The patient is fluent in the language in which the therapy is performed (Spanish in the present study)
- The patient is able to attend to the evaluation and treatment sessions
- The patient signs the informed consent form
You may not qualify if:
- The patient presents a severe mental disorder (bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, or an organic mental disorder) or there is suicide risk at the time of assessment
- The patient has used substances in the last three months (excluding cannabis, coffee, and / or nicotine)
- The patient has previously received 8 or more sessions of psychological treatment with clear and identifiable CBT principles
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Universitat Jaume Ilead
- Universidad de Zaragozacollaborator
Study Sites (3)
Hospital General Universitario de Elda
Elda, Spain
Clínica de Navarra
Pamplona, Spain
Hospital Comarcal de Vinaròs
Vinaròs, Spain
Related Publications (9)
Barlow DH, Farchione TJ, Fairholme CP, Ellard KK, Boisseau CL, Allen LB, Ehrenreich-May J. Protocolo unificado para el tratamiento transdiagnóstico de los trastornos emocionales: Manual del terapeuta y manual del paciente.[The unified protocol for transdiagnostic treatment of emotional disorders: Client workbook and Therapist guide]. Madrid: Alianza Editorial; 2015.
BACKGROUNDBeck AT, Steer R. Beck Anxiety Inventory manual. San Antonio: Psychological Corporation;1993.
BACKGROUNDGallagher MW, Sauer-Zavala SE, Boswell JF, Carl JR, Bullis J, Farchione TJ, Barlow DH. The Impact of the Unified Protocol for Emotional Disorders on Quality of Life. Int J Cogn Ther. 2013 Mar 1;6(1):10.1521/ijct.2013.6.1.57. doi: 10.1521/ijct.2013.6.1.57.
PMID: 24358405BACKGROUNDOsma J, Barrada JR, Garcia-Palacios A, Navarro-Haro M, Aguilar A. Internal Structure and Clinical Utility of the Anxiety Control Questionnaire-Revised (ACQ-R) Spanish Version. Span J Psychol. 2016 Oct 3;19:E63. doi: 10.1017/sjp.2016.69.
PMID: 27692017BACKGROUNDOsma J, Castellano C, Crespo E, García-PalaciosA. The Unified Protocol for Transdiagnostic Treatment of Emotional Disorders in format group in a Spanish public mental health setting. PsicologíaConductual. 2015; 23 (3): 447-466.
BACKGROUNDCarl JR, Gallagher MW, Sauer-Zavala SE, Bentley KH, Barlow DH. A preliminary investigation of the effects of the unified protocol on temperament. Compr Psychiatry. 2014 Aug;55(6):1426-34. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2014.04.015. Epub 2014 Apr 27.
PMID: 24933653BACKGROUNDPeris-Baquero O, Osma J. Unified Protocol for the Transdiagnostic Treatment of Emotional Disorders in Group Format in Spain: Results of a Noninferiority Randomized Controlled Trial at 15 Months after Treatment Onset. Depress Anxiety. 2023 Jun 30;2023:1981377. doi: 10.1155/2023/1981377. eCollection 2023.
PMID: 40224586DERIVEDOsma J, Peris-Baquero O, Suso-Ribera C, Farchione TJ, Barlow DH. Effectiveness of the Unified Protocol for transdiagnostic treatment of emotional disorders in group format in Spain: Results from a randomized controlled trial with 6-months follow-up. Psychother Res. 2022 Mar;32(3):329-342. doi: 10.1080/10503307.2021.1939190. Epub 2021 Jun 16.
PMID: 34132170DERIVEDOsma J, Suso-Ribera C, Garcia-Palacios A, Crespo-Delgado E, Robert-Flor C, Sanchez-Guerrero A, Ferreres-Galan V, Perez-Ayerra L, Malea-Fernandez A, Torres-Alfosea MA. Efficacy of the unified protocol for the treatment of emotional disorders in the Spanish public mental health system using a group format: study protocol for a multicenter, randomized, non-inferiority controlled trial. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2018 Mar 12;16(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s12955-018-0866-2.
PMID: 29530035DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jorge Osma, Ph.D.
Assistant Professor
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Masking Details
- Patients (participants) will know the treatment they have been assigned to, but they will not know whether that treatment is considered TAU or experimental (UP). Healthcare professionals and researchers will know the condition each patient has been assigned to (mandatory to provide a given type of intervention).
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 22, 2017
First Posted
February 27, 2017
Study Start
September 14, 2014
Primary Completion
September 30, 2021
Study Completion
December 30, 2021
Last Updated
June 18, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
IPD will not be shared with other researchers.