Effectiveness of the Justice Diversion Halt-intervention
The Evaluation of the Effectiveness of the Diversion Measure Halt-intervention: a Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
1,300
1 country
1
Brief Summary
In the current study the effectiveness of the Dutch diversion measure Halt is investigated using a randomized controlled trial. Because of the thorough scientific substantiation of the intervention theory, it is hypothesized that receiving the Halt-intervention will lead to less recidivism in comparison to receiving no intervention.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Feb 2024
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 12, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 9, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2027
March 7, 2025
April 1, 2024
3.4 years
March 12, 2024
March 4, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Criminal Recidivism based on self-report
Assessed using the items from the Youth Delinquency Survey.
T0 (baseline); T1 (100 days follow up); T2 (12 month follow up)
Criminal Recidivism based on official police records
Assessed using official Dutch Police registration records.
T3 (24 month follow up)
Criminal Recidivism based on official judiciary records
Assessed using official Dutch judicial records.
T3 (24 month follow up)
Truancy based on self-report
Assessed using the items from the Youth Delinquency Survey.
T0 (baseline); T1 (100 days follow up); T2 (12 month follow up)
Secondary Outcomes (15)
Conventional beliefs
T0 (baseline); T1 (100 days follow up); T2 (12 month follow up)
Minimizing/mislabeling
T0 (baseline); T1 (100 days follow up); T2 (12 month follow up)
Social skills
T0 (baseline); T1 (100 days follow up); T2 (12 month follow up)
Taking responsibility for the consequences of behavior
T0 (baseline); T1 (100 days follow up); T2 (12 month follow up)
Correct wrongdoing
T0 (baseline); T1 (100 days follow up); T2 (12 month follow up)
- +10 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (13)
Mental health problems during the last six months
T0 (baseline)
Experienced problems
T0 (baseline); T1 (100 days follow up); T2 (12 month follow up)
Delinquent friends
T0 (baseline; T1 (100 days follow up); T2 (12 month follow up)
- +10 more other outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Experimental group: Halt-intervention
EXPERIMENTALThe experimental group will receive the Halt-intervention.
Control group: No Halt-intervention
NO INTERVENTIONThe control group will not receive the Halt-intervention, nor will they receive any other intervention or form of punishment.
Interventions
The Halt-intervention is a Dutch extrajudicial, or diversion, measure for minors (aged 12-17) who committed a minor offence. The intervention can consist of conversations with the Halt-employee, working or learning assignments to learn from the mistakes made or to work on certain skills, such as social skills, and/or apologizing to the victim.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Juveniles who have been referred to Halt after committing a minor offence that is eligible for the Halt-intervention.
- Juveniles between the ages of 12 and 18.
You may not qualify if:
- Participants who do not speak Dutch or who do not speak Dutch fluently.
- Participants who have already participated in the study before.
- Participants who are participating in the following Halt-programs: 'Hack\_right', 'Respect Online' or 'Sport en Spel'.
- Participants of whom it is suspected that their are serious concerns for their safety.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek en Datacentrumlead
- Utrecht Universitycollaborator
- Leiden Universitycollaborator
Study Sites (1)
WODC
The Hague, South Holland, 2500EH, Netherlands
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
André M. van der Laan, Prod. Dr.
Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek en Datacentrum
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Prof. dr.
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 12, 2024
First Posted
April 9, 2024
Study Start
February 1, 2024
Primary Completion (Estimated)
July 1, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
July 1, 2027
Last Updated
March 7, 2025
Record last verified: 2024-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
This study is part of a dissertation consisting of multiple articles which will be offered for publication to peer reviewed journals. First the study protocol article will be written and offered for publication to a peer reviewed journal, including a brief Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP) and as supplement the Informed Consent Form (ICF). Thereafter the study results articles will be offered for publication to peer reviewed journals asap. During this period there is no plan to make individual participant data (IPD) available.