Bioactive Versus Non-Bioactive Restorative System in Deep Carious Molars
Outcome of Bioactive Versus Non-Bioactive System for Restoration of Deep Carious Molars Using Selective Caries Removal Technique: 18 Months Randomized Clinical Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
50
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This research study delves into the effectiveness of bioactive and non-bioactive restorative systems in deep carious permanent molars treated with selective caries removal. Selective caries removal techniques aim to preserve as much healthy tooth structure as possible while effectively eliminating carious tissue. The study investigates how the choice of restorative material influences the outcomes of selective caries removal procedures in deep carious lesions. By assessing factors such as restoration integrity, pulpal response, and long-term success rates, the research seeks to provide evidence-based insights into the comparative performance of bioactive and non-bioactive restorative systems in this clinical context.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2024
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 20, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 5, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 10, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 10, 2025
CompletedMarch 18, 2026
March 1, 2026
1.5 years
March 20, 2024
March 16, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Biological properties - Post Operative Hypersensitivity and Vitality-Success rate%-Scoring system:Ordinal1-5
1. excellent(No hypersensitivity,normal vitality 2. good(Minor hypersensitivity for a limited time,normal vitality 3. satisfactory(Moderate hypersensitivity-Delayed/mild sensitivity;no subjective complaints,no treatment needed 4. unsatisfactory(Intense hypersensitivity-Delayed with minor subjective symptoms-No detectable sensitivity-Intervention necessary but not replacement 5. poor(Intense, acute pulpitis or non-vital tooth-Endodontic treatment is necessary and restoration replacement
18 months
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Functional properties - (fracture and retention)
18 months
Functional properties - Approximal anatomical form (contact point and contour)
18 months
continue Functional properties (Radiographic Examination -when applicable)
18 months
continue Functional properties ( marginal adaptation )
18 months
Biological properties (Recurrence of caries (CAR), erosion, abfraction- Scoring system Ordinal 1-5)
18 months
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Conventional non-bioactive restorative system (Comparator)
ACTIVE COMPARATORdeep carious molars restored with conventional resin based restorative system
Bioactive system (Intervention)
ACTIVE COMPARATORdeep carious molars restored with bioactive resin based restorative system
Interventions
conventional dental restorative adhesive and resin based composite
bioactive dental restorative resin based system
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- young adult patients (age: 18-40 years) of both genders.
- Able to tolerate necessary restorative procedures.
- Willing to sign the informed consent.
- Accepts the follow-up period.
- Posterior permanent tooth with occlusal proximal deep carious lesion.
- Radiographically (bitewing radiograph) extending to the inner 1/3 of dentine (D3) with a radiopaque layer between the carious lesion and the pulp chamber.
- Sensible teeth according to cold pulp test.
You may not qualify if:
- Allergy to any restorative materials.
- Patients undergoing orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances.
- Pregnant women.
- Patients with debilitating systemic diseases
- Teeth with previous restorations.
- Spontaneous pain or prolonged pain (more than 15 s) after sensitivity test (cold test), which would indicate irreversible pulpitis.
- Negative sensibility tests, periapical radiolucencies and sensitivity to axial or lateral percussion.
- Mobile teeth, indicating periodontal disease or trauma.
- External or internal resorption.
- Cervical carious lesions.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Cairo Universitylead
Study Sites (1)
Faculty of Dentistry - Cairo University
Cairo, Egypt
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- General practitioner
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 20, 2024
First Posted
April 5, 2024
Study Start
June 1, 2024
Primary Completion
December 10, 2025
Study Completion
December 10, 2025
Last Updated
March 18, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-03