ESWT in Lateral Epicondylitis: Clinical,Ultrasonographic Evaluation
Clinical and Sonographic Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy (ESWT) in Patients With Lateral Epicondylitis
1 other identifier
interventional
42
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study aimed to check and compare how well shock wave therapy works for tennis elbow, both in terms of symptoms and what we can see on ultrasound.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Dec 2020
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2021
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 24, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 2, 2024
CompletedApril 2, 2024
March 1, 2024
9 months
March 24, 2024
March 31, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (6)
Hand Grip Strength
measured using the Jamar hand dynamometer
Baseline, post-treatment(4th week), and one-month post-treatment (8th week)
Pain severity
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) which was scored from 0 (no pain) to 10 (extremely severe).
Baseline, post-treatment(4th week), and one-month post-treatment (8th week)
Functionality
the Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation (PRTEE) The PRTEE allows patients to rate their levels of tennis elbow pain and disability from 0 to 10, and consists of 2 subscales: 1. PAIN subscale (0 = no pain, 10 = worst imaginable) Pain - 5 items 2. FUNCTION subscale (0 = no difficulty, 10 = unable to do) Specific activities - 6 items Usual activities - 4 items In addition to the individual subscale scores, a total score can be computed on a scale of 100 (0 = no disability). Pain Score = Sum of the 5 pain items(out of 50) Best Score = 0, Worst Score =50 Function Score = Sum of the 10 function items, Divided by 2 (out of 50) Best Score = 0, Worst Score = 50 Computing the Total Score Total Score = Sum of pain + function scores Best Score = 0, Worst Score = 50 Best Score = 0, Worst Score = 100
Baseline, post-treatment(4th week), and one-month post-treatment (8th week)
Quality of life score
Short Form-12 (SF-12), Patients are provided with the SF-12 questionnaire, which consists of 12 questions covering physical and mental health domains. The scoring yields two summary measures: the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS). PCS mean score: 56,5 MSC mean score: 60.7 Scores above mean indicate a better-than-average health-related quality of life, while scores below mean suggest below-average health.
Baseline, post-treatment(4th week), and one-month post-treatment (8th week)
deep muscular tissue sensitivity
pain pressure threshold (PPT) Pain pressure threshold (PPT) is used to measure deep muscular tissue sensitivity. The test determines the amount of pressure over a given area in which a steadily increasing nonpainful pressure stimulus turns into a painful pressure sensation. A varying pressure is applied from 0.5 to 1 kg/sec in a perpendicular direction relative to the muscle.
Baseline, post-treatment(4th week), and one-month post-treatment (8th week)
thickness of the common extensor tendon (CET)
During ultrasonography for LE, the elbow is positioned in 90 degrees of flexion and the wrist in pronation. The ultrasound probe is placed longitudinally on the radial surface of the elbow. And common extensor tendon thickness was measured sonographically.
Baseline, post-treatment(4th week), and one-month post-treatment (8th week)
Study Arms (2)
ESWT GROUP
EXPERIMENTALThe ESWT group received radial ESWT on the painful lateral epicondyle once per week for a total of 3 sessions. A wrist resting splint, wrist extensor strengthening and stretching exercises, and ice treatment were administered to both groups.
Sham-ESWT group
SHAM COMPARATORThe Sham-ESWT group received Sham radial ESWT on the painful lateral epicondyle once per week for a total of 3 sessions. A wrist resting splint, wrist extensor strengthening and stretching exercises, and ice treatment were administered to both groups.
Interventions
The ESWT group received radial ESWT each session with a total of 2000 pulses at a frequency of 10 Hz. A gel was used at the interface, and the air pressure was set at 1.8 bar per session.
The Sham-ESWT group received Sham radial ESWT each session, but without actual contact of the applicator. To enhance the illusion of treatment, gel was applied, and the device emitted sound at every shock
Ensuring proper usage of the wrist resting splint by the patient was confirmed during follow-up visits. The physician instructed the patients on stretching and strengthening exercises for wrist extensors, which they were asked to perform three times a day. Application of ice for 20 minutes every 3-4 hours during painful periods was recommended. During follow-up visits patients confirmed that they adherence to exercises and recommendations.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- experiencing pain and tenderness in the lateral epicondyle while extending their wrist and fingers against resistance for at least 3 months
You may not qualify if:
- Patients who are pregnant or have a coagulation disorder, cervical radiculopathy, peripheral neuropathy, peripheral vasculopathy in the upper extremity, complex regional pain syndrome, local infections, systemic inflammatory disease, fibromyalgia syndrome, arthritis (including rheumatoid arthritis, spondylarthritis, and crystal-induced arthropathies), malignancy, or those who have been treated with corticosteroids, PRP, or autologous blood injection, as well as those who have received physical therapy agents, undergone upper-extremity surgical interventions, or have a history of direct trauma to the elbow or a history of fracture,
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Istanbul Medeniyet University Faculty of Medicine, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Department
Istanbul, 34732, Turkey (Türkiye)
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD, Specialist of PMR,Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 24, 2024
First Posted
April 2, 2024
Study Start
December 1, 2020
Primary Completion
September 1, 2021
Study Completion
December 1, 2021
Last Updated
April 2, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share