Investigating the Effects of Neuromobilization in Lateral Epicondylitis
Comparison of the Effects of Neuromobilization and Conservative Rehabilitation Therapy on Pain, Grip Strength and Functional Status in Lateral Epicondylitis
1 other identifier
interventional
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study aimed to determine the effects of neuromobilization techniques and conservative rehabilitation therapy on pain, grip strength, and functional status in patients with lateral epicondylitis (LE). A total of 40 patients (26 females and 14 males; age: 42.80 ± 8.91 years) with a history of LE participated in the study. The patients were randomly assigned to two groups: the neuromobilization group and the control group. The neuromobilization group completed a 6-week conservative rehabilitation and radial nerve mobilization program, whereas the control group received conservative rehabilitation therapy only. Both groups underwent a 7-day weekly conservative home rehabilitation program. Pain severity, grip strength, pinch strength, joint mobility, and upper extremity functional level were assessed before treatment, at the third week, after treatment, and at the sixth week after treatment.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started May 2014
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 15, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 5, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 31, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 7, 2020
CompletedJanuary 7, 2020
January 1, 2020
8 months
December 31, 2019
January 3, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (12)
Pain severity
Pain severity was measured using a 10-cm visual analog scale, labeled from 0 (no pain) to 10 (the worst pain), at rest, at night, and during daily activities
at the beginning of treatment
Pain severity
Pain severity was measured using a 10-cm visual analog scale, labeled from 0 (no pain) to 10 (the worst pain), at rest, at night, and during daily activities
3 weeks later
Pain severity
Pain severity was measured using a 10-cm visual analog scale, labeled from 0 (no pain) to 10 (the worst pain), at rest, at night, and during daily activities
6 weeks later
Pain severity
Pain severity was measured using a 10-cm visual analog scale, labeled from 0 (no pain) to 10 (the worst pain), at rest, at night, and during daily activities
12 weeks later
Grip strength
Grip strength was measured using two different test methods: pain-free grip strength and maximum grip strength. Both tests were performed in the sitting position with the elbow flexed at 90° and in the standing position with the elbow extended at 0°. Both tests were performed using a calibrated hydraulic hand dynamometer® (Jamar, Bolingbrook IL).The measurements of both extremities were repeated 3 times with a resting interval of 30 s between each measurement. The average of the three trials was recorded in kilograms (kg).
at the beginning of treatment
Grip strength
Grip strength was measured using two different test methods: pain-free grip strength and maximum grip strength. Both tests were performed in the sitting position with the elbow flexed at 90° and in the standing position with the elbow extended at 0°. Both tests were performed using a calibrated hydraulic hand dynamometer® (Jamar, Bolingbrook IL).The measurements of both extremities were repeated 3 times with a resting interval of 30 s between each measurement. The average of the three trials was recorded in kilograms (kg).
3 weeks later
Grip strength
Grip strength was measured using two different test methods: pain-free grip strength and maximum grip strength. Both tests were performed in the sitting position with the elbow flexed at 90° and in the standing position with the elbow extended at 0°. Both tests were performed using a calibrated hydraulic hand dynamometer® (Jamar, Bolingbrook IL).The measurements of both extremities were repeated 3 times with a resting interval of 30 s between each measurement. The average of the three trials was recorded in kilograms (kg).
6 weeks later
Grip strength
Grip strength was measured using two different test methods: pain-free grip strength and maximum grip strength. Both tests were performed in the sitting position with the elbow flexed at 90° and in the standing position with the elbow extended at 0°. Both tests were performed using a calibrated hydraulic hand dynamometer® (Jamar, Bolingbrook IL).The measurements of both extremities were repeated 3 times with a resting interval of 30 s between each measurement. The average of the three trials was recorded in kilograms (kg).
12 weeks later
Tip pinch and key pinch
Tip pinch and key pinch were measured using the "Baseline Mechanical Pinch Gauge" (FEI, White Plains, NY). Measurements were repeated 3 times with a resting interval of 30 s between each measurement. The average of the three trials was recorded in kg.
at the beginning of treatment
Tip pinch and key pinch
Tip pinch and key pinch were measured using the "Baseline Mechanical Pinch Gauge" (FEI, White Plains, NY). Measurements were repeated 3 times with a resting interval of 30 s between each measurement. The average of the three trials was recorded in kg.
3 weeks later
Tip pinch and key pinch
Tip pinch and key pinch were measured using the "Baseline Mechanical Pinch Gauge" (FEI, White Plains, NY). Measurements were repeated 3 times with a resting interval of 30 s between each measurement. The average of the three trials was recorded in kg.
6 weeks later
Tip pinch and key pinch
Tip pinch and key pinch were measured using the "Baseline Mechanical Pinch Gauge" (FEI, White Plains, NY). Measurements were repeated 3 times with a resting interval of 30 s between each measurement. The average of the three trials was recorded in kg.
12 weeks later
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Wrist active range of motion (ROM)'s
at the beginning of treatment
Wrist active range of motion (ROM)'s
3 weeks later
Wrist active range of motion (ROM)'s
6 weeks later
Wrist active range of motion (ROM)'s
12 weeks later
The functional status of the upper extremity
at the beginning of treatment
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Neuromobilization group
EXPERIMENTALThe neuromobilization group received a supervised home program plus radial nerve mobilization. Radial nerve mobilization exercises were performed by the physiotherapist for 3 days a week for 3 weeks. The patients in the neuromobilization group also performed self-neuromobilization exercises at home for 6 weeks. Supervised home program including patient education and eccentric exercises was administered three times daily for 6 weeks.
Control group
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe control group received a supervised home program. Supervised home program including patient education and eccentric exercises was administered 3 times a day for 6 weeks.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients aged \>18 years
- A symptom duration of \>3 months
You may not qualify if:
- Bilateral symptoms
- Rheumatologic diseases affecting the elbow and the wrist
- Musculoskeletal disorders due to connective tissue diseases
- Diffuse pain syndrome
- Cervical radiculopathy
- Nerve compression syndromes involving upper extremity
- Undergone surgery at the affected arm
- Received an LE treatment in the last 6 months
- An inability to perform the exercises
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
KTO Karatay University
Konya, 42020, Turkey (Türkiye)
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Kamil Yılmaz, 1
KTO Karatay University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Double Blinded
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 31, 2019
First Posted
January 7, 2020
Study Start
May 1, 2014
Primary Completion
December 15, 2014
Study Completion
January 5, 2015
Last Updated
January 7, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-01