Comparison Between Ultrasound-Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Ultrasound-Guided Caudal Injection
1 other identifier
interventional
80
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Patient-controlled analgesia is typically used to relieve postoperative pain. Patient-controlled analgesia, on the other hand, is prone to opioid-related side effects. Furthermore, standard postoperative analgesia has a limited analgesic impact. If postoperative lumbosacral spine pain is not successfully treated, it can progress to chronic pain, compromising patients' quality of life. The methods of access for epidural injections are characterized as transforaminal, interlaminar, or caudal. Caudal epidural injections (CEI) are often utilized as a diagnostic or therapeutic tool in a range of lumbosacral-originating spinal pain problems, and they are especially useful in patients with complicated lumbar epidural access diseases, such as post laminectomy syndrome. It is regarded as a very simple treatment in the realm of interventional pain management, and it is also recognized to have a reduced risk of inadvertent Dural puncture than other epidural techniques
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable postoperative-pain
Started Apr 2024
Typical duration for not_applicable postoperative-pain
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 22, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 28, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2025
CompletedMarch 28, 2024
March 1, 2024
1 year
March 22, 2024
March 22, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Measurement of Post-operative Pain
Assessment of Pain after operations will be evaluated using the VAS consisting of a horizontal or vertical line, 10 centimeters long (100 mm) anchored at the extremes by two verbal descriptors referring to the pain status
the first 24 hours postoperatively
Study Arms (2)
Group A ( Erector Spinae Plane Block)
ACTIVE COMPARATORAbout 40 patients who will be subjected to Ultrasound-Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block.for Postoperative Pain Management
Group B (Caudal Injection)
ACTIVE COMPARATORAbout 40 patients who will be subjected to Ultrasound-Guided Caudal Injection in Lumbosacral Spine Surgeries for Postoperative Pain Management
Interventions
to compare between Ultrasound-Guided ESPB and Ultrasound-Guided CEI for postoperative pain relief in patients who underwent lumbosacral surgeries.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients undergoing lumbosacral spine surgeries from (L4-L5) level to end of spinal cord.
- American society of anesthesiologists' classification (ASA) I \& II.
You may not qualify if:
- Patient's refusal.
- History of any previous back surgeries.
- History of any spinal cord deformities e.g., Scoliosis, Lordosis, Kyphosis, Ankylosing Spondylitis
- Bleeding disorders (platelets count \< 80,000; International normalized ratio \>1.4; PC\< 70%) and coagulopathies.
- Skin lesion, wounds, or infection at the injection site.
- Known allergy to local anesthetic drugs.
- Peripheral and Central Neuropathy.
- Patients with pre-operative opioid consumption.
- Chronic opioids or analgesics users.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Al-Azhar University hospitals
Cairo, Egypt
Related Publications (2)
Patel Y, Ramachandran K, Shetty AP, Chelliah S, Subramanian B, Kanna RM, Shanmuganathan R. Comparison Between Relative Efficacy of Erector Spinae Plane Block and Caudal Epidural Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Lumbar Fusion Surgery- A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study. Global Spine J. 2025 Mar;15(2):639-647. doi: 10.1177/21925682231203653. Epub 2023 Sep 22.
PMID: 37737097RESULTShah M, Halalmeh DR, Sandio A, Tubbs RS, Moisi MD. Anatomical Variations That Can Lead to Spine Surgery at the Wrong Level: Part III Lumbosacral Spine. Cureus. 2020 Jul 28;12(7):e9433. doi: 10.7759/cureus.9433.
PMID: 32864257RESULT
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Tarek Monir, Professor
Anesthesiology, Intensive care, and Pain Management, Faculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Cairo,Egypt
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 22, 2024
First Posted
March 28, 2024
Study Start
April 1, 2024
Primary Completion
April 1, 2025
Study Completion
May 1, 2025
Last Updated
March 28, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-03