Splenic Embolisation Decisions
SPEED
Decision to Treat Acute Traumatic Splenic Artery Injury in the Context of Trauma
1 other identifier
observational
8,000
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The spleen is often injured when the body sustains trauma. This leads to bleeding. The bleeding can be stopped by a big operation cutting open the belly or a small hole in your groin where a blood vessel can be accessed and through which the bleeding can be stopped. We do not know what types of injuries it is best to use this procedure. We do not know why we do not use the smaller technique in some instances. We also do not know exactly which of a number of ways to stop the bleeding could be better. We have a big data set in the trauma and audit research network (TARN) which we would like to use to help answer these questions and design further studies to better answer the questions. Adding a few other pieces of data, we are able to answer key questions into how the spleen will best be treated in trauma.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Jul 2024
Typical duration for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 21, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 27, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 22, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 2, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 30, 2026
December 4, 2025
November 1, 2025
1.9 years
March 21, 2024
November 26, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
Splenic embolisation rate as percentage of; acute splenic trauma per Major Trauma Centre (MTC)
Splenic embolisation rate as percentage of; acute splenic trauma, per injury grade and per Major Trauma Centre (MTC). Failure of conservative management rate and splenectomy rate.
5 years
Number of On call IR consultants affecting embolisation rate
Does the number of on call IR consultants affect the embolisaiton rate
5 years
What is the splenic salvage rate for proximal versus distal embolisation
What is the splenic salvage rate for proximal versus distal embolisation
5 years
Readmission rate of splenic embolisation versus splenectomy
Readmission rate of splenic embolisation versus splenectomy
5 years
Embolisation failure
Embolisation failure rate
5 years
Study Arms (3)
Conservative management
No intervention for splenic injury other than supportive care
Splenic embolisation
Interventional radiology guided splenic artery embolisation
Splenectomy
Surgical splenectomy
Eligibility Criteria
All patients identified as having an acute traumatic splenic injury grade AAST 2-5 on the TARN database between the given dates will be included. Hospitals who decline participation in the data collection will have their patients excluded from the analysis excluded by site as identified in TARN database
You may qualify if:
- All patients who had traumatic splenic injury between 01/01/2016 and 31/12/2020 with data available from TARN CT available for review.
You may not qualify if:
- CT not available to radiologically grade the Splenic injury
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust
Plymouth, Devon, PL6 5DH, United Kingdom
Related Publications (6)
Chakraverty S, Flood K, Kessel D, McPherson S, Nicholson T, Ray CE Jr, Robertson I, van Delden OM. CIRSE guidelines: quality improvement guidelines for endovascular treatment of traumatic hemorrhage. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2012 Jun;35(3):472-82. doi: 10.1007/s00270-012-0339-7. Epub 2012 Jan 20. No abstract available.
PMID: 22271075BACKGROUNDKozar RA, Crandall M, Shanmuganathan K, Zarzaur BL, Coburn M, Cribari C, Kaups K, Schuster K, Tominaga GT; AAST Patient Assessment Committee. Organ injury scaling 2018 update: Spleen, liver, and kidney. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2018 Dec;85(6):1119-1122. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002058. No abstract available.
PMID: 30462622BACKGROUNDYiannoullou P, Hall C, Newton K, Pearce L, Bouamra O, Jenks T, Scrimshire AB, Hughes J, Lecky F, Macdonald A. A review of the management of blunt splenic trauma in England and Wales: have regional trauma networks influenced management strategies and outcomes? Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2017 Jan;99(1):63-69. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2016.0325. Epub 2016 Oct 28.
PMID: 27791418BACKGROUND4. RCR 2015 - Standards for practice and guidance for trauma radiology in the severely injured patient. Available at: https://www.rcr.ac.uk/system/files/publication/field_publication_files/bfcr155_traumaradiol.pdf
BACKGROUNDSchnuriger B, Inaba K, Konstantinidis A, Lustenberger T, Chan LS, Demetriades D. Outcomes of proximal versus distal splenic artery embolization after trauma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Trauma. 2011 Jan;70(1):252-60. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181f2a92e.
PMID: 21217497BACKGROUNDFoley PT, Kavnoudias H, Cameron PU, Czarnecki C, Paul E, Lyon SM. Proximal Versus Distal Splenic Artery Embolisation for Blunt Splenic Trauma: What is the Impact on Splenic Immune Function? Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2015 Oct;38(5):1143-51. doi: 10.1007/s00270-015-1162-8. Epub 2015 Jul 3.
PMID: 26139039BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- OTHER
- Time Perspective
- OTHER
- Target Duration
- 3 Years
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 21, 2024
First Posted
March 27, 2024
Study Start
July 22, 2024
Primary Completion (Estimated)
June 2, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
September 30, 2026
Last Updated
December 4, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-11