Comparative Effectiveness Study of Constant-Load Versus Graded Aerobic Exercise in Obese Children With Bronchial Asthma
Constant-load Versus Graded Aerobic Exercise for Promoting Cardiorespiratory Fitness and Functional Capacity in Obese Children With Bronchial Asthma: a Randomized Comparative Effectiveness Inquiry
1 other identifier
interventional
78
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study aimed to compare the effect of constant-load aerobic exercise (CL-AE) and graded aerobic exercise (G-AE) on cardiopulmonary fitness, and functional capacity in a cohort of obese children with bronchial asthma (BA). A total of 78 children with BA were randomly assigned to the CL-AE group (n = 26, who underwent moderate-intensity aerobic training with the training load maintained at the same level throughout the entire program, besides the respiratory re-training program), the G-AE group (n = 26, received an intensity- and duration-graded aerobic training in addition to the respiratory re-training program), or the control group (n = 29, who only engaged in a respiratory re-training program). Interventions were administered three times/week for 12 successive weeks. The cardiopulmonary fitness and functional capacity were evaluated in the three groups before and after the completion of the assigned interventions.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2022
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 30, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 7, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 7, 2023
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 17, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 22, 2024
CompletedMarch 22, 2024
March 1, 2024
1.1 years
March 17, 2024
March 17, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Peak oxygen uptake
The peak oxygen uptake (mL/kg/min) was assessed through a symptom-free exercise tolerance test (i.e., the McMaster cycling protocol).
3 months
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Six-minute walk test
3 months
Dyspnea
3 months
Fatigue
3 months
Study Arms (3)
CL-AE group
EXPERIMENTALThe CL-AE group received a 12-week constant-load aerobic training besides the respiratory retraining program.
G-AE group
EXPERIMENTALThe G-AE group received a 12-week intensity- and duration-graded aerobic training in addition to the respiratory re-training.
Control group
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe control group received the respiratory re-training only for 12 consecutive weeks.
Interventions
The CL-AE group received a 12-week aerobic training, three times in addition to the respiratory re-training. the program included a moderate-intensity aerobic training program, with an intensity set at 65% of the maximum age-predicted heart rate for 45 minutes. The training intensity and duration were maintained at the same level throughout the program. The CL-AE program included a warm-up for 5 minutes and a cool-down for 5 minutes
The G-AE group received a 12-week intensity- and duration-graded aerobic training, three times in addition to the respiratory re-training. The G-AE program commenced with a training intensity corresponding to 50% of the maximum age-predicted heart rate for 25 minutes in the first two weeks, which progressed on a two-week basis, and ended up with a training intensity corresponding to 75% of the maximum age-predicted heart rate for 50 minutes in the last two weeks. The G-AE program also included a warm-up for 5 minutes and a cool-down for 5 minutes.
The respiratory re-training lasted for 30 minutes per session and was repeated three times a week for 12 consecutive weeks. The program consisted of diaphragmatic breathing exercises, breath-hold, and breathing control exercises, pursed lip breathing, respiratory muscle strengthening, postural correction exercises, and relaxation techniques.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age of 8-18 years
- Body mass index ranging from 30 to 35 kg/m2
- Verified asthma diagnosis per the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) criteria
- Moderate Onset
- Clinically Stable
- Maintained medication dosages in the past three months
- Free of lower limb or spinal deformities
- Not engaging in regular exercise regimens in the past six months.
You may not qualify if:
- Exacerbated asthma symptoms
- Chronic lung comorbidities
- Cardiovascular or musculoskeletal conditions expected to hinder the training.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Cairo Universitylead
Study Sites (1)
Ragab K. Elnaggar
Al Kharj, Riyadh Region, Saudi Arabia
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ragab K. Elnaggar, PhD
Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- A single-blind protocol was adopted. The researcher who collected the data was blind to the allocation of treatment
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 17, 2024
First Posted
March 22, 2024
Study Start
October 30, 2022
Primary Completion
December 7, 2023
Study Completion
December 7, 2023
Last Updated
March 22, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share