Setting a PERSONalized Outcome in ASthma: the PERSONAS Study. A Patient Driven Outcome (PDO) Study
PERSONAS
1 other identifier
interventional
190
1 country
12
Brief Summary
To optimize the effectiveness of asthma therapy there is a need to identify and address individual patient goals. Considering the self-management discussion as central for the achievement of health outcomes, Healthcare Providers may help patients make specific actions to obtain their desired goals. The current evidence suggest that Healthcare Professionals need to develop a more patient-centered and partnership-based approach based on the development and review of action plans, including the experiential asthma knowledge of patients and caregivers. From a practical perspective, the specialist (i.e. pulmunologists, allergologists, etc) has clear therapeutic targets to be reached in asthmatic patients: for example, improving the disease control, the spirometric values and asthma control test (ACT) score vs. pre-treatment evaluations represent the standard outcomes to reach (GINA 2019). However, as previously described, patients are more likely to achieve an improved clinical outcome when the treatment is driven by a personalized goal. This builds on the same principle as shared decision making between the physician and patient, recognizing both the personal motivation and the accountability on behalf of the patient (Hoskins et al. 2016). This study aims to evaluate if the identification of a personalized outcome allows patients to achieve a better control of asthma in terms of asthma control test (ACT) and asthma quality of life questionnaire (AQLQ). In addition, a set of clinical outcomes (i.e. forced expiratory volume in one second - FEV1, use of rescue therapy, night awakeness) will also be assessed.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jan 2023
Typical duration for not_applicable
12 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2023
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 13, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 20, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 15, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 30, 2025
CompletedApril 11, 2024
March 1, 2024
2 years
March 13, 2024
April 9, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Primary Outcome. The primary outcome of the study is to evaluate the impact of the personalized approach on asthma control (PDO group) versus a non-personalized approach (UC group).
The primary outcome of the study is to evaluate the impact of the personalized approach on asthma control (PDO group) versus a non-personalized approach (UC group). Primary outcome will be measured at month 3 by asthma control test (ACT).
Primary outcome will be measured at month 3 by asthma control test (ACT).
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Secondary Outcome. To evaluate the impact of the personalized approach on asthma control (PDO group) versus a non-personalized approach (UC group) assessed by the change of ACT from month 3 to month 6.
from month 3 to month 6
Secondary outcome. To evaluate the impact of the personalized approach on asthma control (PDO group) versus a non-personalized approach (UC group) assessed by the change of AQLQ from baseline to month 3.
from baseline to month 3
Secondary outcome. To evaluate the impact of the personalized approach on asthma control (PDO group) versus a non-personalized approach (UC group) assessed by the change of AQLQ from month 3 to month 6.
from month 3 to month 6;
Secondary outcome. To evaluate the impact of the personalized approach on asthma control assessed by the change of lung function (pulmonary functions tests: FEV1, FVC, FEV1/FVC) from baseline to month 3.
from baseline to month 3
Secondary outcome. To evaluate the impact of the personalized approach on asthma control assessed by the change of lung function (pulmonary functions tests: FEV1, FVC, FEV1/FVC) from baseline from month 3 to month 6.
from month 3 to month 6
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Personal approach on asthma control (PDO group)
EXPERIMENTALNon-personalized approach (UC group)
NO INTERVENTIONInterventions
Patients in the intervention gruop with set a personalized outcome within a usual asthma review consultation
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Male and female patients aged ≥18 years;
- Patients with a documented diagnosis of mild/moderate asthma, according to GINA, for at least 6 months before visit 1;
- Patients on LABA/ICS chronic inhaled treatment (\> 4 weeks before visit 1);
- ACT values \<20 points
- No smoking patients, or former smokers (at least 1 year since quitting smoking, and no more than 10 pack/year, according the WHO definition);
- Patients able to set up a personal outcome according to the protocol instruction, and willing to improve their personal outcome;
- Patients able to understand written and spoken Italian;
- Patients who give their informed consent to participate in the study.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients treated with oral corticosteroids (OCS) and/or biological for severe refractory asthma;
- Patients treated with OCS for any other chronic disease;
- Subjects with current evidence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), pneumonia, active tuberculosis, active lung cancer, significant bronchiectasis, sarcoidosis, lung fibrosis, pulmonary hypertension, interstitial lung diseases or other active pulmonary diseases or respiratory abnormalities other than asthma;
- Subjects with historical or current evidence of clinically significant cardiovascular, neurological, psychiatric, renal, hepatic, immunological, gastrointestinal, urogenital, nervous system, musculoskeletal, skin, sensory, endocrine (including uncontrolled diabetes or thyroid disease) or hematological abnormalities that are uncontrolled. Significant is defined as any disease that, in the opinion of the Investigator, would put the safety of the subject at risk through participation, or which would affect the efficacy or safety analysis if the disease/condition exacerbated during the study.
- Subjects with a history of psychiatric disease, intellectual deficiency, poor motivation or other conditions that will limit the validity of informed consent to participate in the study.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (12)
ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII
Bergamo, 24127, Italy
Azienda ospedaliera Spedali Civili di Brescia
Brescia, 25123, Italy
Ospedale San Martino di Genova
Genova, 16132, Italy
ASST Fate Bene e Fratelli Sacco
Milan, 20100, Italy
ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda
Milan, 20100, Italy
ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo
Milan, 20100, Italy
Fondazione IRCCS Cà Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico Milano
Milan, 20122, Italy
Policlinico San Matteo
Pavia, 27100, Italy
Ospedale di Rovigo
Rovigo, 45100, Italy
Humanitas Hospital - UO Allergologia
Rozzano, 20089, Italy
Humanitas Hospital - UO Pneumologia
Rozzano, 20089, Italy
Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri, IRCCS Tradate
Tradate, 21049, Italy
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 13, 2024
First Posted
March 20, 2024
Study Start
January 1, 2023
Primary Completion
January 15, 2025
Study Completion
September 30, 2025
Last Updated
April 11, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-03