NCT06317870

Brief Summary

The aim of this clinical trial is to compare the analgesic effect of pericapsular nerve block (PENG) with intrathecal morphine in patients scheduled for total hip replacement surgery. The main question to be answered is whether the PENG block is equivalent to intrathecal morphine in reducing postoperative pain. Participants will be randomised into two groups. Patients assigned to the PENG group will receive spinal anaesthesia with local anaesthetic (isobaric bupivacaine) alone and a PENG block. Patients assigned to the intrathecal morphine (ITM) group will receive spinal anaesthesia with a mixture of local anaesthetic (isobaric bupivacaine) and morphine (100 mcg) and a sham PENG block to ensure patient blinding.

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
80

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
12mo left

Started Sep 2024

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress63%
Sep 2024May 2027

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 4, 2024

Completed
15 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 19, 2024

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 10, 2024

Completed
2.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 1, 2027

Expected
4 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 1, 2027

Last Updated

August 22, 2024

Status Verified

August 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

2.3 years

First QC Date

March 4, 2024

Last Update Submit

August 20, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

nerve blockintrathecal morphinepostoperative painhip arthroplasty

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Cumulative postoperative morphine consumption at day 1

    total consumption in mg

    24 hours postoperatively

Secondary Outcomes (9)

  • Morphine consumption in the recovery room

    from admission till discharge from the recovery room, up to 2 hours

  • PCA administered morphine consumption at day 2

    at day 2 postoperatively

  • rest and dynamic pain scores

    at 2 hours, day 1 and day 2 postoperatively

  • Incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting

    at 2 hours, day 1 and day 2 postoperatively

  • Incidence of pruritus

    at 2 hours, day 1 and day 2 postoperatively

  • +4 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

PENG group

EXPERIMENTAL

Pericapsular nerve group block

Procedure: Pericapsular nerve group block (PENG)

ITM group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

intrathecal morphine injection

Procedure: Intrathecal morphine

Interventions

Spinal anesthesia will be performed as follows: patient will be placed in the lateral decubitus position on the non-operative side. Using sterile gloves red chlorhexidine 2% alcohol solution will be used for skin disinfection. The site will be secured with a sterile drape, and the L4-L5 lumbar space identified. After subcutaneous local infiltration with 1% lidocaine, a 25G Whitacre pencil point spinal needle will be used to access the intrathecal space with free flow of cerebrospinal fluid as confirmation. A mixture of 12.5 mg of isobaric bupivacaine and 100 mcg of morphine will be administered intrathecally. After the spinal anesthesia, the intrathecal morphine (ITM) group will receive a sham PENG block with the block needle inserted subcutaneously, the anesthesiologist using the same verbal block confirmation commands "aspirate, inject" but the needle withdrawn without injection. This will create the appearance of an identical cutaneous injection site to ensure patient blinding.

ITM group

Spinal anesthesia with intrathecal injection of 12.5 mg of isobaric bupivacaine will be performed, followed by a PENG block. After skin disinfection, a low frequency curvilinear ultrasound probe (2-5 MHz 8870, BK ultrasound, Peabody Massachussets, US) with a sterile covering will be used to identify the anterior inferior iliac spine, the pubic eminence and the psoas tendon with its fascial plane. A 22 gauge 10cm block needle (Sonoplex® Pajunk, Geisingen, DE), will be used to enter the fascial plane and 20ml of 0.75% Ropivacain (Fresenius Kabi, Krienz CH) will be injected.

PENG group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Male and female patients
  • ASA (American Society of Anaesthesiologists) I-III
  • years of age or older
  • Patients scheduled for elective primary hip arthroplasty
  • Able to give written conformed consent autonomously

You may not qualify if:

  • Refusal or inability to give consent
  • Allergy to any of: ropivacaine, paracetamol, ibuprofen, ketorolac, morphine, ondansetron or dexamethasone
  • Bleeding diathesis
  • Neurological deficit of the operative side
  • Existing preoperative opioid use
  • Renal insufficiency (GFR\<30ml/min according to the Cockroft-Gault formula)
  • Hepatic insufficiency
  • Pregnant or lactating women

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University Hospital of Lausanne

Lausanne, Canton of Vaud, 1011, Switzerland

RECRUITING

Related Publications (12)

  • Anger M, Valovska T, Beloeil H, Lirk P, Joshi GP, Van de Velde M, Raeder J; PROSPECT Working Group* and the European Society of Regional Anaesthesia and Pain Therapy. PROSPECT guideline for total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and procedure-specific postoperative pain management recommendations. Anaesthesia. 2021 Aug;76(8):1082-1097. doi: 10.1111/anae.15498. Epub 2021 May 20.

    PMID: 34015859BACKGROUND
  • Gonvers E, El-Boghdadly K, Grape S, Albrecht E. Efficacy and safety of intrathecal morphine for analgesia after lower joint arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis with meta-regression and trial sequential analysis. Anaesthesia. 2021 Dec;76(12):1648-1658. doi: 10.1111/anae.15569. Epub 2021 Aug 27.

    PMID: 34448492BACKGROUND
  • Vitola E, Buraka N, Erts R, Golubovska I, Miscuks A. Effect of different low doses of intrathecal morphine (0.1 and 0.2 mg) on pain and vital functions in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty: a randomised controlled study. BMC Anesthesiol. 2022 Dec 5;22(1):377. doi: 10.1186/s12871-022-01919-8.

    PMID: 36471258BACKGROUND
  • Kuchalik J, Granath B, Ljunggren A, Magnuson A, Lundin A, Gupta A. Postoperative pain relief after total hip arthroplasty: a randomized, double-blind comparison between intrathecal morphine and local infiltration analgesia. Br J Anaesth. 2013 Nov;111(5):793-9. doi: 10.1093/bja/aet248. Epub 2013 Jul 19.

    PMID: 23872462BACKGROUND
  • Souron V, Delaunay L, Schifrine P. Intrathecal morphine provides better postoperative analgesia than psoas compartment block after primary hip arthroplasty. Can J Anaesth. 2003 Jun-Jul;50(6):574-9. doi: 10.1007/BF03018643.

    PMID: 12826549BACKGROUND
  • Kearns R, Macfarlane A, Grant A, Puxty K, Harrison P, Shaw M, Anderson K, Kinsella J. A randomised, controlled, double blind, non-inferiority trial of ultrasound-guided fascia iliaca block vs. spinal morphine for analgesia after primary hip arthroplasty. Anaesthesia. 2016 Dec;71(12):1431-1440. doi: 10.1111/anae.13620. Epub 2016 Oct 7.

    PMID: 27714758BACKGROUND
  • Roofthooft E, Joshi GP, Rawal N, Van de Velde M; PROSPECT Working Group* of the European Society of Regional Anaesthesia and Pain Therapy and supported by the Obstetric Anaesthetists' Association. PROSPECT guideline for elective caesarean section: updated systematic review and procedure-specific postoperative pain management recommendations. Anaesthesia. 2021 May;76(5):665-680. doi: 10.1111/anae.15339. Epub 2020 Dec 28.

    PMID: 33370462BACKGROUND
  • Giron-Arango L, Peng PWH, Chin KJ, Brull R, Perlas A. Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) Block for Hip Fracture. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2018 Nov;43(8):859-863. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000847.

    PMID: 30063657BACKGROUND
  • Pascarella G, Costa F, Del Buono R, Pulitano R, Strumia A, Piliego C, De Quattro E, Cataldo R, Agro FE, Carassiti M; collaborators. Impact of the pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block on postoperative analgesia and functional recovery following total hip arthroplasty: a randomised, observer-masked, controlled trial. Anaesthesia. 2021 Nov;76(11):1492-1498. doi: 10.1111/anae.15536. Epub 2021 Jul 1.

    PMID: 34196965BACKGROUND
  • Lin DY, Brown B, Morrison C, Fraser NS, Chooi CSL, Cehic MG, McLeod DH, Henningsen MD, Sladojevic N, Kroon HM, Jaarsma RL. The Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) block combined with Local Infiltration Analgesia (LIA) compared to placebo and LIA in hip arthroplasty surgery: a multi-center double-blinded randomized-controlled trial. BMC Anesthesiol. 2022 Aug 6;22(1):252. doi: 10.1186/s12871-022-01787-2.

    PMID: 35933328BACKGROUND
  • Hu J, Wang Q, Hu J, Kang P, Yang J. Efficacy of Ultrasound-Guided Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) Block Combined With Local Infiltration Analgesia on Postoperative Pain After Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Prospective, Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial. J Arthroplasty. 2023 Jun;38(6):1096-1103. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.12.023. Epub 2022 Dec 16.

    PMID: 36529195BACKGROUND
  • Aliste J, Layera S, Bravo D, Jara A, Munoz G, Barrientos C, Wulf R, Branez J, Finlayson RJ, Tran Q. Randomized comparison between pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block and suprainguinal fascia iliaca block for total hip arthroplasty. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2021 Oct;46(10):874-878. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2021-102997. Epub 2021 Jul 20.

    PMID: 34290085BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

AgnosiaPain, Postoperative

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Perceptual DisordersNeurobehavioral ManifestationsNeurologic ManifestationsNervous System DiseasesSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsPostoperative ComplicationsPathologic ProcessesPain

Central Study Contacts

Eric Albrecht, Prof

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
quadruple
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: single centered, prospective, double blinded non inferiority trial
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Prof. Dr. Med. Eric Albrecht, Associate Professor, University of Lausanne

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 4, 2024

First Posted

March 19, 2024

Study Start

September 10, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 1, 2027

Last Updated

August 22, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-08

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations