Ultrasound Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Retrolaminar Plane Block
Comparison Between the Efficacy of Ultrasound Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Retrolaminar Plane Block for Postoperative Pain in Patients Undergoing Hepatobiliary Surgery
1 other identifier
interventional
50
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Retrolaminar block (RLB) and erector spinae plane block (ESPB) are alternative approaches to paravertebral block (PVB) and are advantageous in that they are easier and safer techniques compared with the traditional PVB. These blocks are considered to be compartment blocks or interfascial plane blocks. In these approaches, local anesthetics are assumed to penetrate the superior costotransverse ligament and reach the paravertebral space, although the needle tip is not advanced into the paravertebral space. the study aim to evaluate and compare the analgesic efficacy of retrolaminar plane block and erector spinae plane block.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2023
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 20, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 31, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 10, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2023
CompletedOctober 13, 2023
October 1, 2023
5 months
January 20, 2023
October 12, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Visual analogue pain scale
score from 0-10 (0 mean no pain and 10 the worst pain )
24 hour
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Time of first post operative analgesic request.
24 hour
Total analgesic consumption
24 hour
Study Arms (2)
Retrolaminar plane block
EXPERIMENTALESPB
EXPERIMENTALInterventions
curved probe will be placed 1-1.5 cm lateral to the target spinous process after identification of the lamina, the needle will be advanced caudally until it contacts the lamina
curved probe will be placed 2-3 cm lateral to the spine using a sagittal approach at the level of T8. After identification of erector spinae muscle and transverse processes, the needle will be inserted deeply into the erector spinae muscle.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age18-60.
- Both genders.
- hepatobiliary surgery.
- ASA I-III.
You may not qualify if:
- Drug allergy.
- Morbid obesity (BMI \>40 kg/m2).
- Psychiatric disorder.
- Opiod dependence.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Minia Universitylead
Study Sites (1)
Minia University
Minya, Minya Governorate, 61511, Egypt
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- lecturer of anesthesia and ICU
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 20, 2023
First Posted
January 31, 2023
Study Start
February 10, 2023
Primary Completion
July 1, 2023
Study Completion
August 1, 2023
Last Updated
October 13, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share