The Effect of the Helper Skin Tap Technique and Buzzy® During Vaccination
1 other identifier
interventional
96
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Aim: This randomised controlled experimental study was conducted to determine the effect of Helfer Skin Tap Technique and Buzzy® application on the pain level during measles-mumps-rubella-mumps (MMR) vaccine injection in 4-year-old children.Method: The study was a randomised controlled experimental study. The sample of the study consisted of 96 children (buzzy: 32, helfer skin tap: 32, control: 32) who underwent MMR vaccination at Bakırköy Family Health Centre No. 9 between May 2023 and October 2023. Data Collection Form, Wong-Baker pain scale, Fear scale and Buzzy® device were used as data collection tools. Buzzy® and Helfer skin tap technique were applied to the children in the intervention group before and after the vaccine injection, while routine vaccine injection was applied to the children in the control group. Children's pain and fear responses were evaluated by the nurse and parents before and after vaccine injection, and physiological parameters were evaluated by the nurse before and after vaccine injection.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started May 2023
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 2, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 2, 2023
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 8, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 15, 2024
CompletedMarch 15, 2024
March 1, 2024
5 months
March 8, 2024
March 13, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Child Information Form
The information form has been prepared by reviewing the literature on the subject (Canbulat and Bal 2015; Canbulat et al 2014) and includes the child's age, gender, height, weight, presence of other children in the family, physiological parameters before and after vaccination injection, Wong-Baker pain score, and Fear score evaluated by the nurse, parent, and child before and after the vaccination injection. There are a total of 5 questions in the data collection form.
1 day
Wong-Baker Scale (Pain Facial Expression Scale)
The Wong-Baker scale consists of faces representing increasing levels of pain from zero to five, moving from left to right. The face on the far left has a smiling expression, indicating a pain-free condition, while the face on the far right has a crying expression, representing the most severe pain. Each facial expression is accompanied by a brief description explaining the pain intensity: 0 - no pain, 1 - mild pain, 2 - a bit more pain, 3 - even more pain, 4 - quite a lot of pain, 5 - the most severe pain.
1 day
Child Fear Scale
The Child Fear Scale is used to assess the anxiety levels of children with five face shapes scored between 0-4: 0 = no anxiety, and 4 = severe anxiety. The scale can be evaluated by both the child and the researcher before, during, and after the intervention.
1 day
Study Arms (3)
Helper Skin Tap Technique Group
EXPERIMENTALBefore the vaccine injection, body weight, height and physiological parameters (pulse, blood pressure, SpO2, body temperature) were measured and behavioural pain responses were evaluated by the child, nurse and parent using the Wong-Baker pain scale and fear scale. Slow tapping was performed with rhythmic tapping movements on the left deltoid muscle where the vaccine will be administered to the children. When the needle was to be inserted into the deltoid muscle, the tapping was slightly increased and the needle entry was made with the same movement. After the vaccine injection was given, the needle was rapidly withdrawn from the muscle by increasing the tapping movements while the needle was withdrawn.
Buzzy Group
EXPERIMENTALBefore the vaccine injection, body weight, height and physiological parameters (pulse, blood pressure, SpO2, body temperature) were measured and behavioural pain responses were evaluated by the child, nurse and parent using the Wong-Baker pain scale and fear scale. The ice pack previously removed from the deep freezer was kept at room temperature for 10 minutes and the hole in the ice pack wing was placed on the hook behind the Buzzy®. The Buzzy® was placed on the left arm deltoid muscle and activated and kept for 30 seconds. After 30 seconds, Buzzy® was pulled up 1 centimetre (cm) and the MMR vaccine injection was administered to the area corresponding to the left deltoid muscle. After the vaccine injection, Buzzy® was pulled to the injection site and kept for another 30 seconds.
Control Group
NO INTERVENTIONBefore the vaccine injection, body weight, height and physiological parameters (pulse, blood pressure, SpO2, body temperature) were measured and behavioural pain responses were evaluated by the child, nurse and parent using the Wong-Baker pain scale and fear scale. MMR vaccine injection was routinely administered in the area corresponding to the left deltoid muscle without any intervention or application to the injection site.
Interventions
Slow tapping was performed with rhythmic tapping movements on the left deltoid muscle where the vaccine will be administered to the children. When the needle was to be inserted into the deltoid muscle, the tapping was slightly increased and the needle entry was made with the same movement. After the vaccine injection was given, the needle was rapidly withdrawn from the muscle by increasing the tapping movements while the needle was withdrawn.
The ice pack previously removed from the deep freezer was kept at room temperature for 10 minutes and the hole in the ice pack wing was placed on the hook behind the Buzzy®. The Buzzy® was placed on the left arm deltoid muscle and activated and kept for 30 seconds. After 30 seconds, Buzzy® was pulled up 1 centimetre (cm) and the MMR vaccine injection was administered to the area corresponding to the left deltoid muscle. After the vaccine injection, Buzzy® was pulled to the injection site and kept for another 30 seconds.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- The child being at least 4 years old,
- The administration of the DTP vaccine,
- Being at an appropriate weight for their age,
- The child not having received any analgesic medication during the day,
- The willingness of the parent to participate in the research
You may not qualify if:
- \- Having a neurological illness,
- Having a chronic illness,
- Having an allergy (egg allergy),
- Having a body temperature above 37.5 degrees Celsius
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Tarsus University
Mersin, 33400, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (8)
Ayinde O, Hayward RS, Ross JDC. The effect of intramuscular injection technique on injection associated pain; a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2021 May 3;16(5):e0250883. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250883. eCollection 2021.
PMID: 33939726BACKGROUNDTherese, A. M., & Devi, S. (2014). Effectiveness of Helfer skin tap technique and routine technique on pain reduction among patients receiving intramuscular injection at Government General Hospital, Puducherry. Int J Sci Res, 3(10).
BACKGROUNDJose, R. M., Sulochana, B., & Shetty, S. (2012). Effectiveness of Skin Tap Technique in Reducing Pain Response. International Journal of Nursing Education, 4(1).
BACKGROUNDMahato, E. (2019). Effectiveness of Helfer's Skin Tap Technique Versus Routine Technique on Pain Reduction among Patient's Receiving Intramuscular Injections. International Journal of Nursing Education, 11(1),41-44.
BACKGROUNDTaddio A, McMurtry CM, Shah V, Riddell RP, Chambers CT, Noel M, MacDonald NE, Rogers J, Bucci LM, Mousmanis P, Lang E, Halperin SA, Bowles S, Halpert C, Ipp M, Asmundson GJG, Rieder MJ, Robson K, Uleryk E, Antony MM, Dubey V, Hanrahan A, Lockett D, Scott J, Bleeker EV; HELPinKids&Adults. Reducing pain during vaccine injections: clinical practice guideline. CMAJ. 2015 Sep 22;187(13):975-982. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.150391. Epub 2015 Aug 24. No abstract available.
PMID: 26303247BACKGROUNDShah V, Taddio A, McMurtry CM, Halperin SA, Noel M, Pillai Riddell R, Chambers CT; HELPinKIDS Team. Pharmacological and Combined Interventions to Reduce Vaccine Injection Pain in Children and Adults: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Clin J Pain. 2015 Oct;31(10 Suppl):S38-63. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000281.
PMID: 26201016BACKGROUNDNoel M, Chambers CT, McGrath PJ, Klein RM, Stewart SH. The influence of children's pain memories on subsequent pain experience. Pain. 2012 Aug;153(8):1563-1572. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2012.02.020. Epub 2012 May 3.
PMID: 22560288BACKGROUNDKoc T, Gozen D. The Effect of Foot Reflexology on Acute Pain in Infants: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2015 Oct;12(5):289-96. doi: 10.1111/wvn.12099. Epub 2015 Jul 28.
PMID: 26220257BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 8, 2024
First Posted
March 15, 2024
Study Start
May 1, 2023
Primary Completion
October 2, 2023
Study Completion
October 2, 2023
Last Updated
March 15, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-03