Action Observation Therapy Versus Mirror Therapy on Upper Limb in Stroke
Comparison of Action Observation Therapy Versus Mirror Therapy on Upper Limb Physical Performance and Quality of Life in Stroke
1 other identifier
interventional
50
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Stroke is a medical condition which causes the cessation of blood flow to the brain cells and results in cell death and ultimately can lead to motor disorders, perception disorders, language disorders, sensory disturbances.It is well known that stroke is the leading cause of death and one of the greatest causes of long-term motor disability in adults.The incidence of stroke is increasing day by day in low-income countries as compared to high-income countries because of the effects of not using evidence-based practice in health-related conditions in low-income countries. In the last few years, several approaches have been used for the recovery of hand dexterity after stroke. Among them, the Mirror therapy, task-oriented therapy, robot-assisted rehabilitation and action observation has gained greatest attention.Action observation training is one of the new developing rehabilitation technique that targets motor learning by the activation of mirror neurons and is the most important approach that targets the motor and functional recovery in stroke patients. In action observation training, the movements are produced because of the external stimuli in which actually the visual attention recruit the cerebellar-thalamic-cortical circuit of the brain. Action observation is based on activities of the motor neuron system and they discharge mostly in association with complex tasks as compared to simple tasks.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable stroke
Started Oct 2022
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable stroke
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 14, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 16, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2023
CompletedDecember 12, 2022
December 1, 2022
5 months
September 14, 2022
December 9, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Fugel Meyer assessment scale for upper limb
An assessment scale for post stroke hemiplegic patients and is performance-based impairment index. This scale is having 5 domains namely Motor functioning, Sensory Functioning, Balance, Joint Range of Motion and Joint pain. I divided the motor functioning for upper extremity into 0 to 66 points and evaluates mobility, speed and coordination
week 6
Box and Block Test (BBT)
This test is used to evaluate the manual dexterity of post stroke patients. BBT is composed of wooden box with two equal compartments having 150 boxes in one compartment and patient is asked to move the boxes from one compartment to another within 60 seconds. Before starting the test an extra 15 seconds time is given to the patient for familiarization with the test. First the patient performed the activity with the healthy arm and then with the affected arm. Scoring is done on the basis of the number of boxes transferred from one compartment to another within 60 seconds
week 6
Functional Independence Measure (FIM)
The FIM is a commonly used scale for assessing the performance in basic daily activities. It contains 18 items (i.e., 13 motor and 5 cognition items), and the total score ranges from 0 to 126
week 6
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Stroke Impact Scale (SIS) version 3.0
week 6
Study Arms (2)
Action Observation Therapy
EXPERIMENTALThe patients in the action observation therapy group will be required to observe the upper limb movements or functional actions in video clips. (i.e., the observation phase) and to execute what they had observed to the best of their ability (i.e., the execution phase). Three common categories of movements and tasks will be elected in the action observation therapy protocol based on the related literature
Mirror Therapy
ACTIVE COMPARATORDuring the mirror therapy, the patients will be seated in front of a mirror box placed at their mid-sagittal plane. The affected arm of the participants will be placed inside the mirror box and the unaffected arm in front of the mirror. The patient will be instructed to watch the mirror reflection of the movement performed by his/her unaffected hand carefully and to imagine that the movement was performed by the affected hand.
Interventions
following phases will be included in action observation therapy group: 1. upper limb active range of motion (AROM) exercises. 2. reaching movement or object manipulation. 3. upper limb functional tasks.
following phases will be included in mirror therapy group: 1. AROM exercises), 2. reaching movement or object manipulation, and 3. functional task practice
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Both male and female
- Middle cerebral artery stroke
- to 6 months of stroke onset
- Baseline score of the Fugyl Myer Assessment is between 20 and 60 for the upper limb.
- Modified Ashworth scale with a score of 2 Ability to follow the study instructions-Mini mental state examination (MMSE) score \>25
You may not qualify if:
- Participants failing to fall in this category would be excluded from the study.
- Patients who cannot perform the active movement of the upper limb in pre-stroke condition due to musculoskeletal problems
- cardiopulmonary diseases which could hinder their ability to participate in the rehabilitation program in this study
- Patient with impaired cognition
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Helping hand institute of rehabilitation sciences
Mansehra, Pakistan
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ayesha Afridi, PhD*
Riphah International University
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 14, 2022
First Posted
September 16, 2022
Study Start
October 1, 2022
Primary Completion
March 1, 2023
Study Completion
March 1, 2023
Last Updated
December 12, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share