NCT06306170

Brief Summary

This is an observational mono-institutional study. Patients with gynecologic tumors treated with advanced radiotherapy- Image Guided Radiotherapy (IGRT), Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT), Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT)- will be included and toxicity and outcomes analyzed.

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
1,000

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for all trials

Timeline
34mo left

Started Feb 2024

Longer than P75 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress44%
Feb 2024Feb 2029

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 14, 2024

Completed
1 day until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 15, 2024

Completed
26 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 12, 2024

Completed
2.9 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 15, 2027

Expected
2 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 15, 2029

Last Updated

April 22, 2025

Status Verified

April 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

3 years

First QC Date

February 14, 2024

Last Update Submit

April 19, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

Gynecologic CancerImage Guided RadiotherapyPET/CTIntensity Modulated RadiotherapyStereotactic Body RadiotherapyOligometastases

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (6)

  • Local Relapse Free Survival

    local control (on the treated site) of the disease

    From date of radiotherapy end until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 120 months

  • Regional Relapse Free Survival

    regional control (regional lymph nodal chain) of the disease

    From date of radiotherapy end until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 120 months

  • Distant Metastases Free Survival

    distant metastases developed after the treatment

    From date of radiotherapy end until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 120 months

  • Disease Free Survival

    absence of disease progression during the follow-up

    From date of radiotherapy end until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 120 months

  • Overall Survival

    survival from all causes

    From date of radiotherapy end until the date of death from any cause, assessed up to 120 months

  • Cancer Specific Survival

    cancer survival

    From date of radiotherapy end until the date of death from disease progression, assessed up to 120 months

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Acute toxicity

    Up to three months from the start of radiotherapy

  • Late toxicity

    From three months after the start of radiotherapy until the end of follow-up or death, assessed up to 120 months

Other Outcomes (2)

  • Predictive factors for disease progression and death

    From radiotherapy end to date of local, regional progression, distant failure, or death, assessed up to 120 months

  • Radiomic predictive factors for disease progression and death

    From radiotherapy end to the first registered event (disease progression or death), assessed up to 120 months

Study Arms (1)

Gynecologic cancer patients

Gynecologic cancer patients treated with IGRT, IMRT, SBRT (advanced radiotherapy-ART)

Radiation: Image Guided Radiotherapy

Interventions

Patients treated with IGRT, IMRT, SBRT for Gynecological cancer will be evaluated

Also known as: Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy, Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy
Gynecologic cancer patients

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 90 Years
Sexfemale(Gender-based eligibility)
Gender Eligibility DetailsGynecologic tumor patients
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodProbability Sample
Study Population

Gynecologic cancer patients, \> 18 years old, treated with IGRT, IMRT, SBRT

You may qualify if:

  • gynecologic cancer patients
  • \>18 years old
  • treated with advanced radiotherapy techniques (IGRT, IMRT, SBRT)

You may not qualify if:

  • other tumors
  • \> 90 years old

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

San Raffaele Scientific Institute

Milan, MI, 20132, Italy

RECRUITING

Related Publications (24)

  • Gavinski K, DiNardo D. Cervical Cancer Screening. Med Clin North Am. 2023 Mar;107(2):259-269. doi: 10.1016/j.mcna.2022.10.006. Epub 2022 Dec 26.

  • Stewart C, Ralyea C, Lockwood S. Ovarian Cancer: An Integrated Review. Semin Oncol Nurs. 2019 Apr;35(2):151-156. doi: 10.1016/j.soncn.2019.02.001. Epub 2019 Mar 11.

  • Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fuchs HE, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2022. CA Cancer J Clin. 2022 Jan;72(1):7-33. doi: 10.3322/caac.21708. Epub 2022 Jan 12.

  • Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, Bray F. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209-249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. Epub 2021 Feb 4.

  • Makker V, MacKay H, Ray-Coquard I, Levine DA, Westin SN, Aoki D, Oaknin A. Endometrial cancer. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2021 Dec 9;7(1):88. doi: 10.1038/s41572-021-00324-8.

  • Berek JS, Matias-Guiu X, Creutzberg C, Fotopoulou C, Gaffney D, Kehoe S, Lindemann K, Mutch D, Concin N; Endometrial Cancer Staging Subcommittee, FIGO Women's Cancer Committee. FIGO staging of endometrial cancer: 2023. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2023 Aug;162(2):383-394. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.14923. Epub 2023 Jun 20.

  • Guckenberger M, Lievens Y, Bouma AB, Collette L, Dekker A, deSouza NM, Dingemans AC, Fournier B, Hurkmans C, Lecouvet FE, Meattini I, Mendez Romero A, Ricardi U, Russell NS, Schanne DH, Scorsetti M, Tombal B, Verellen D, Verfaillie C, Ost P. Characterisation and classification of oligometastatic disease: a European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology and European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer consensus recommendation. Lancet Oncol. 2020 Jan;21(1):e18-e28. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30718-1.

  • Colombo N, Creutzberg C, Amant F, Bosse T, Gonzalez-Martin A, Ledermann J, Marth C, Nout R, Querleu D, Mirza MR, Sessa C; ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO Endometrial Consensus Conference Working Group. ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO Consensus Conference on Endometrial Cancer: diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2016 Jan;27(1):16-41. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdv484. Epub 2015 Dec 2.

  • Tortorella L, Restaino S, Zannoni GF, Vizzielli G, Chiantera V, Cappuccio S, Gioe A, La Fera E, Dinoi G, Angelico G, Scambia G, Fanfani F. Substantial lymph-vascular space invasion (LVSI) as predictor of distant relapse and poor prognosis in low-risk early-stage endometrial cancer. J Gynecol Oncol. 2021 Mar;32(2):e11. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2021.32.e11. Epub 2021 Jan 11.

  • Ramanathan S, Tirumani SH, Ojili V. Nodal metastasis in gynecologic malignancies: Update on imaging and management. Clin Imaging. 2020 Feb;59(2):157-166. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2019.11.006. Epub 2019 Nov 28.

  • Milam MR, Java J, Walker JL, Metzinger DS, Parker LP, Coleman RL; Gynecologic Oncology Group. Nodal metastasis risk in endometrioid endometrial cancer. Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Feb;119(2 Pt 1):286-92. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318240de51.

  • Fournier M, Stoeckle E, Guyon F, Brouste V, Thomas L, MacGrogan G, Floquet A. Lymph node involvement in epithelial ovarian cancer: sites and risk factors in a series of 355 patients. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2009 Nov;19(8):1307-13. doi: 10.1111/IGC.0b013e3181b8a07c.

  • Woelber L, Eulenburg C, Choschzick M, Kruell A, Petersen C, Gieseking F, Jaenicke F, Mahner S. Prognostic role of lymph node metastases in vulvar cancer and implications for adjuvant treatment. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2012 Mar;22(3):503-8. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0b013e31823eed4c.

  • Yang B, Zhu L, Cheng H, Li Q, Zhang Y, Zhao Y. Dosimetric comparison of intensity modulated radiotherapy and three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy in patients with gynecologic malignancies: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Radiat Oncol. 2012 Nov 23;7:197. doi: 10.1186/1748-717X-7-197.

  • Kidd EA, Siegel BA, Dehdashti F, Rader JS, Mutic S, Mutch DG, Powell MA, Grigsby PW. Clinical outcomes of definitive intensity-modulated radiation therapy with fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography simulation in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010 Jul 15;77(4):1085-91. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.06.041. Epub 2009 Oct 31.

  • Chen CC, Lin JC, Jan JS, Ho SC, Wang L. Definitive intensity-modulated radiation therapy with concurrent chemotherapy for patients with locally advanced cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2011 Jul;122(1):9-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.03.034. Epub 2011 Apr 22.

  • Jhingran A, Winter K, Portelance L, Miller B, Salehpour M, Gaur R, Souhami L, Small W Jr, Berk L, Gaffney D. A phase II study of intensity modulated radiation therapy to the pelvis for postoperative patients with endometrial carcinoma: radiation therapy oncology group trial 0418. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Sep 1;84(1):e23-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.02.044. Epub 2012 Apr 28.

  • Jereczek-Fossa BA, Ronchi S, Orecchia R. Is Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) in lymph node oligometastatic patients feasible and effective? Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2015 Nov-Dec;20(6):472-83. doi: 10.1016/j.rpor.2014.10.004. Epub 2014 Nov 7.

  • Ling DC, Vargo JA, Burton SA, Heron DE, Beriwal S. Salvage Curative-Intent Reirradiation Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Isolated Pelvic and/or Paraortic Recurrences of Gynecologic Malignancies. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2019 Nov;9(6):418-425. doi: 10.1016/j.prro.2019.05.012. Epub 2019 May 28.

  • Macchia G, Lazzari R, Colombo N, Laliscia C, Capelli G, D'Agostino GR, Deodato F, Maranzano E, Ippolito E, Ronchi S, Paiar F, Scorsetti M, Cilla S, Ingargiola R, Huscher A, Cerrotta AM, Fodor A, Vicenzi L, Russo D, Borghesi S, Perrucci E, Pignata S, Aristei C, Morganti AG, Scambia G, Valentini V, Jereczek-Fossa BA, Ferrandina G. A Large, Multicenter, Retrospective Study on Efficacy and Safety of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) in Oligometastatic Ovarian Cancer (MITO RT1 Study): A Collaboration of MITO, AIRO GYN, and MaNGO Groups. Oncologist. 2020 Feb;25(2):e311-e320. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0309. Epub 2019 Oct 10.

  • Macchia G, Nardangeli A, Laliscia C, Fodor A, Draghini L, Gentile PC, D'Agostino GR, Balcet V, Bonome P, Ferioli M, Autorino R, Vicenzi L, Raguso A, Borghesi S, Ippolito E, Di Cataldo V, Cilla S, Perrucci E, Campitelli M, Gambacorta MA, Deodato F, Scambia G, Ferrandina G. Stereotactic body radiotherapy in oligometastatic cervical cancer (MITO-RT2/RAD study): a collaboration of MITO, AIRO GYN, and MaNGO groups. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2022 Jun 6;32(6):732-739. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2021-003237.

  • Macchia G, Pezzulla D, Campitelli M, Laliscia C, Fodor A, Bonome P, Draghini L, Ippolito E, De Sanctis V, Ferioli M, Titone F, Balcet V, Di Cataldo V, Russo D, Vicenzi L, Cossa S, Lucci S, Cilla S, Deodato F, Gambacorta MA, Scambia G, Morganti AG, Ferrandina G. Efficacy and Safety of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy in Oligometastatic Uterine Cancer (MITO-RT2/RAD): A Large, Real-World Study in Collaboration With Italian Association of Radiation Oncology, Multicenter Italian Trials in Ovarian Cancer, and Mario Negri Gynecologic Oncology Group Groups. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2023 Oct 1;117(2):321-332. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.04.025. Epub 2023 May 6.

  • Reshko LB, Baliga S, Crandley EF, Harry Lomas IV, Richardson MK, Spencer K, Bennion N, Mikdachi HE, Irvin W, Kersh CR. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in recurrent, persistent or oligometastatic gynecological cancers. Gynecol Oncol. 2020 Dec;159(3):611-617. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.10.001. Epub 2020 Oct 12.

  • Grigsby PW, Singh AK, Siegel BA, Dehdashti F, Rader J, Zoberi I. Lymph node control in cervical cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004 Jul 1;59(3):706-12. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2003.12.038.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Radiation InjuriesDisease Progression

Interventions

Radiotherapy, Image-GuidedRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedRadiosurgery

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Wounds and InjuriesDisease AttributesPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

RadiotherapyTherapeuticsRadiotherapy, ConformalRadiotherapy, Computer-AssistedStereotaxic TechniquesNeurosurgical ProceduresSurgical Procedures, OperativeInvestigative Techniques

Study Officials

  • andrei Fodor, MD

    IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Andrei Fodor, MD

CONTACT

Nadia G Di Muzio, Prof

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
RETROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
MD

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 14, 2024

First Posted

March 12, 2024

Study Start

February 15, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

February 15, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

February 15, 2029

Last Updated

April 22, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

The data that support the findings of this study (anonymized individual participant data) are available on request from the corresponding author to researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal. Requests made to the corresponding author (AF) will be evaluated by the Lombardy Territorial Ethics Committee

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, CSR, ANALYTIC CODE
Time Frame
for another 2 years after the closure of the study
Access Criteria
request from the corresponding author approved by the Lombardy Territorial Ethics Committee

Locations