Pelvis Adaptive Radiotherapy (ART)
Pelvis ART
Pelvis Adaptive Radiation Therapy
1 other identifier
interventional
280
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Pelvis Adaptive radiotherapy (ART) is a two phase study looking at using adaptive radiotherapy to help reduce toxicity for cancer patients having radiotherapy in the pelvic region. Adaptive radiotherapy is a new technology that provides the ability to account for daily changes in anatomy. Adaptive radiotherapy also provides a foundation for which radiotherapy margins might be safely reduced. Phase 1 of this study is looking to see if a radiation therapist centred adaptive workflow can be implemented. If phase 1 of this study is safe and feasible, the study will proceed to phase 2. Phase 2 of the study looks at using adaptive technology to reduce radiation treatment margins. The primary aim of this study is to see whether margin reduced treatment using adaptive radiotherapy can reduce side effects for patients with cancer in the pelvic area.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Oct 2025
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 17, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 21, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 9, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 30, 2029
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 30, 2031
February 5, 2026
February 1, 2026
4.1 years
October 17, 2024
February 3, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Dose coverage of Clinical Target Volume (CTV) (% of CTV receiving 95% of prescribed dose) will be performed between the two arms (Safety).
The CTV dose coverage must be equal or better in 90% of fractions for 90% of patients in the adaptive arm will be compared with the virtual image guided radiotherapy (IGRT) fraction. Dose coverage will be calculated as the percent of CTV receiving at least 95% of the prescribed dose (TD). Percentage will be measured from 0-100%, a higher % is a better outcome.
12 months
The percentage of organ at risk (OAR) dose volume histogram (DVH) metrics satisfying departmental protocol constraints will be compared for each patient between the two arms (Safety).
The OAR DVH dose constraints must be equal or better in 90% of fractions for 90% of patients compared with the virtual image guided radiotherapy (IGRT) fraction (safety). Percentage will be measured from 0-100%, a higher % is a better outcome.
12 months
The percentage of successfully delivered fractions on the adaptive arm will be measured (feasibility).
At least 90% of patients must have 90% of planned adaptive treatments successfully delivered in phase 1 of the study. Percentage will be measured from 0-100%, a higher % is a better outcome.
12 months
Acute patient reported toxicity
The study will measure the difference in patient reported combined maximum genitourinGU and GI toxicity (Grade 2 or higher) as per PRO-CTCAE between the two treatment arms. PRO-CTCAE scale is generally measured from 0 to 5, higher scale being a worse outcome.
Within 90 days of patients completing treatment
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Acute clinician reported toxicity
Within 90 days of patients completing treatment
Late clinician reported toxicity
5 years
Late patient reported toxicity
5 years
Disease free survival (DFS) (incorporating biochemical DFS for prostate cancer patients
5 years
Time differences between treatment arms
5 years
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Adaptive radiotherapy +/- margin reduction
ACTIVE COMPARATORPhase 1 and 2: Treating Radiation Therapists (RTs) on the treatment machine will review the treatment target and organs at risk contours that are automatically generated on the plan of the day. They will modify these safely, as required, and then also approve the computer generated re-plan of the day, within the bounds of departmental protocols and decision guides (RT led). Phase 2 only: Margin reduction facilitated by adaptive radiotherapy.
Standard radiotherapy
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients will receive standard image guided radiotherapy
Interventions
Radiotherapy using adaptive technology to recontour and re-plan daily as required. Reductions in the PTV margin will also be introduced in the second phase of this study.
Standard radiation treatment used in the department of radiation oncology for cancer in pelvic area
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age \> 18
- ECOG performance status 0-2
- Patients receiving curative or adjuvant pelvic radiation including:
- Prostate cancer where nodal treatment is required
- Prostate cancer post prostatectomy
- Bladder cancer
- Rectal cancer
- Anal cancer
- Adjuvant radiotherapy for gynaecological cancers
- Pelvic Lymph nodes only
- Ability to understand and the willingness to sign an informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Hip prosthesis
- Patient separation from approximate radiation centre to skin edge \> 24cm, measured on diagnostic scan
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Northern Sydney Local Health District
St Leonards, New South Wales, 2065, Australia
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Andrew Kneebone
Northern Sydney Local Health District
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 17, 2024
First Posted
October 21, 2024
Study Start
October 9, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
November 30, 2029
Study Completion (Estimated)
November 30, 2031
Last Updated
February 5, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-02