Human-centered Injury Thrivorship Pathway for Survivors of Physical Trauma
Identifying & Addressing Unmet Needs of Injury Survivors at a Safety Net Hospital in San Francisco
2 other identifiers
interventional
25
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to pilot and evaluate a human-centered injury thrivorship pathway in injury survivors. The main question it aims to answer is: • Is the pathway appropriate, acceptable, and feasible to meet the medical and social needs of injury survivors? Injury survivors will be purposively sampled to enroll in the pathway and asked to participate in in-depth interviews and their use of pathway resources will be tracked.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2027
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 14, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 4, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2027
ExpectedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2027
Study Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2027
May 1, 2026
April 1, 2026
5 months
February 14, 2024
April 29, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Early Implementation Outcomes - Acceptability, Appropriateness, Feasibility
Early implementation outcomes will be assessed via purposive sampling of pathway participants, their caregivers, and trauma care stakeholders for in-depth semi-structured interviews. "Acceptability is the perception among implementation stakeholders that a given treatment, service, practice, or innovation is agreeable, palatable, or satisfactory. Appropriateness is the perceived fit, relevance, or compatibility of the innovation or evidence based practice for a given practice setting, provider, or consumer; and/or perceived fit of the innovation to address a particular issue or problem. Feasibility is defined as the extent to which a new treatment, or an innovation, can be successfully used or carried out within a given agency or setting."
8-12 weeks post-pathway enrollment
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Participant pathway resource utilization - type
8-12 weeks post-pathway enrollment plus subsequent time points if continued resource engagement until study completion up to 1 year
Participant pathway resource utilization - frequency
8-12 weeks post-pathway enrollment plus subsequent time points if continued resource engagement until study completion up to 1 year
Participant pathway resource utilization - duration
8-12 weeks post-pathway enrollment plus subsequent time points if continued resource engagement until study completion up to 1 year
Participant pathway resource utilization - % utilized
8-12 weeks post-pathway enrollment plus subsequent time points if continued resource engagement until study completion up to 1 year
Study Arms (1)
Injury Thrivorship Pathway
EXPERIMENTALEnrollment in the human-centered injury thrivorship pathway.
Interventions
Enrollment in the human-centered injury thrivorship pathway.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patient ≥ 18 years old presenting with a physical injury to Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital
- Admitted to the hospital ≥ 24 hours
- Discharged from the hospital alive
- San Francisco resident or unhoused in San Francisco
- Capacity for informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Patient \< 18 years old
- Deceased during index hospitalization
- Unable to provide informed consent
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital
San Francisco, California, 94110, United States
Related Publications (1)
Proctor E, Silmere H, Raghavan R, Hovmand P, Aarons G, Bunger A, Griffey R, Hensley M. Outcomes for implementation research: conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2011 Mar;38(2):65-76. doi: 10.1007/s10488-010-0319-7.
PMID: 20957426BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Marissa A Boeck, MD, MPH
University of California, San Francisco
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 14, 2024
First Posted
March 4, 2024
Study Start (Estimated)
January 1, 2027
Primary Completion (Estimated)
June 1, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
June 1, 2027
Last Updated
May 1, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
The investigators are undecided how individual participant data will be shared with other researchers, which the investigators will update prior to the initial recruitment date. The primary outcome will be qualitative data from in-depth semi-structured interviews linked to participant demographic and clinical information. The secondary outcome will be quantitative based on resource utilization, also linked to participant demographic and clinical information.