NCT06286202

Brief Summary

Adults with serious mental illnesses (such as schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorders) often experience a range of cognitive difficulties (such as memory, problem solving difficulties) that affect their ability to lead meaningful life roles. Cognitive remediation is an intervention to address cognitive difficulties in this group of mental health service users. Its implementation in less well-resourced community-based settings is less well-studied. Therefore, the aims of the study are:

  • To investigate the effects of cognitive remediation on various cognitive skills (such as attention, memory, problem-solving, facial expression recognition, taking others' perspectives etc), for participants with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorders in community mental health settings.
  • To investigate if factors such as participants' motivation for engagement and social interaction can affect changes in cognitive skills and functional ability. Participants in the treatment group will attend computer-based cognitive exercises to improve their cognitive skills. They will also participate in group sessions facilitated by therapists to learn how to utilize strategies learned from the computer sessions in their daily lives. Participants in the control group will attend the usual rehabilitation activities in their respective community-based psychiatric rehabilitation centers. This research study will compare the differences in their cognitive performance, functional ability and recovery immediately after the intervention and 8 weeks later.

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
160

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable schizophrenia

Timeline
19mo left

Started Aug 2024

Typical duration for not_applicable schizophrenia

Geographic Reach
1 country

5 active sites

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress53%
Aug 2024Dec 2027

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 22, 2024

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 29, 2024

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 6, 2024

Completed
2.8 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 1, 2027

Expected
6 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2027

Last Updated

January 27, 2026

Status Verified

January 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

2.8 years

First QC Date

February 22, 2024

Last Update Submit

January 25, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

cognitive remediationNeuropsychological and Educational Approach to RemediationMulticontext Treatment Approachmetamotivationpsychiatric rehabilitationschizophreniacommunity mental health

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

  • Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia (BACS)

    The Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia (BACS) assesses the aspects of cognition found to be most impaired and most strongly correlated with outcome in patients with schizophrenia. This assessment was validated and found to be sensitive and highly correlated with the standard battery composite scores in patients (r = 0.76) and healthy controls (r = 0.90) (Keefe et.al., 2004). BACS was also previously normed in English-speaking adult age Singaporeans (Eng et al., 2014), and had demonstrated good convergent validity with education (Lam et al., 2013) and discriminability between healthy controls and schizophrenia (Lam et al., 2014). BACS is now widely used as an outcome measurement for cognitive remediation for schizophrenia.

    Baseline, post-intervention and 8-week follow-up

  • Bell Lysaker Emotion Recognition Task (BLERT)

    The Bell Lysaker Emotion Recognition Task (BLERT) measures the participants' ability to process and recognize seven emotional states: happiness, sadness, fear, disgust, surprise, anger, or no emotion (Bryson, Bell and Lysaker, 1997). The participants will be presented with 21 video clips of an actor demonstrating facial, voice-tonal and upper-body movement cues, while engaging in work-related monologues. Unlike static photos, this measurement appears to simulate real-world situations better and may approximate real world functional outcomes (Pinkham et.al., 2016). Rating was done by computing the total number of correctly recognized emotions (ranging from 0 to 21).

    Baseline, post-intervention and 8-week follow-up

  • Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM)

    The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) is a person-centered tool that measures aspects of functional and personal recovery among clients whose occupational performance and participation are affected by their current psychiatric conditions. Through a semi-structured interview, the clients identify activities in self-care, productivity and leisure that are of personal importance and rate their performance and satisfaction in each activity (Law et.al., 1990). Self-perceived performance and satisfaction are rated on a 10-point Likert scale.

    Baseline, post-intervention and 8-week follow-up

  • Social and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale (SOFAS)

    The Social and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale (SOFAS) is a global rating of current functioning ranging from 0 to 100, with lower scores representing lower functioning (Goldman et.al., 1992). It differs from GAF scale by focusing on social and occupational functioning independent of the overall severity of the individual's psychological symptoms. SOFAS has been used as a functional outcome measurement in cognitive remediation trials (Au-Yeung et.al., 2023; Harris et.al., 2022; Hodge et.al., 2010).

    Baseline, post-intervention and 8-week follow-up

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS)

    Baseline, post-intervention and 8-week follow-up

  • Brief Negative Symptom Scale (BNSS)

    Baseline, post-intervention and 8-week follow-up

  • Brief Regulation of Motivation Scale (BRoMS)

    Baseline, post-intervention and 8-week follow-up

  • Weekly Calendar Planning Activity (WCPA)

    Baseline, post-intervention and 8-week follow-up

Other Outcomes (1)

  • The Global Assessment of Functioning Scale (GAF)

    Baseline only, to exclude participants with a score of 30 or lower.

Study Arms (2)

Cognitive Remediation: Adapted Neuropsychological and Education Approach to Remediation (NEAR)

EXPERIMENTAL

NEAR consists of using carefully selected computer cognitive games to restore cognitive functioning through rehearsal and strategy learning. It will be delivered 3 times a week for 12 weeks at the center. The duration of each session within the week is as follows: 1) First session: 45 min computer-assisted cognitive exercises + 30 min bridging group; 2) Second session: 30 min computer-assisted cognitive exercises + 45 min bridging group; 3) Third session: 45 min computer-assisted cognitive exercises. Computer-assisted cognitive exercises are sessions where participants engage in cognitive games that target different cognitive domains. In addition, the Multicontext Treatment Approach to strategy learning will be carried out. The metacognitive framework of self-evaluation and activity mediation will also be utilized. Bridging groups are conducted twice a week, to aid transfer of learning from the computer game sessions to the participants' everyday life.

Behavioral: Cognitive Remediation: Adapted Neuropsychological and Education Approach to Remediation (NEAR)

Standard Psychiatric Rehabilitation at Anglican Care Centers

OTHER

Participants in the control arm will attend their scheduled activities at their respective Anglican Care Centers. The Anglican Care Centers run a variety of activities to provide psychosocial rehabilitation for clients with serious mental illness. These may include vocational training such as training in a retail shop or café, instrumental activities of daily living training (eg: taking public transport, money management), psychoeducation, social skills training etc. Participants in the control arm will not be enrolled into the cognitive remediation.

Behavioral: Standard Psychiatric Rehabilitation at Anglican Care Centers

Interventions

NEAR consists of computer-assisted cognitive exercises to restore cognitive functioning through rehearsal and strategy learning. Based on the results of the baseline assessments, the therapist will complete the Cognitive Remediation Treatment Plan, to outline targeted cognitive domains and functional goals. During the cognitive games sessions, the Multicontext Treatment Approach will be used, where error patterns are identified. The participants will work on metacognition and use of strategies to overcome challenges faced during the computer games sessions. Bridging groups may include activities for participants to utilize strategies learnt during the computer game sessions to everyday living. Participants will also learn about cognitive impairments and how lifestyle modifications, mood regulation etc can affect cognitive performance. In addition, they will learn about metamotivation and build awareness about their motivation levels through self- reflection and self-monitoring.

Cognitive Remediation: Adapted Neuropsychological and Education Approach to Remediation (NEAR)

Participants in the control arm will attend their usual psychiatric rehabilitation activities. These activities may include vocational training, community living skills training, psychoeducation, social skills training and peer support etc. These activities are also undertaken by participants in the experimental arm.

Standard Psychiatric Rehabilitation at Anglican Care Centers

Eligibility Criteria

Age21 Years - 60 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • A diagnosis of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder according to Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-5th Edition (DSM-V).
  • Completed at least ten years of formal education with English as the main instructional language. Participants need to be able to converse in English and understand English instructions, as the cognitive remediation program will be conducted in English.

You may not qualify if:

  • Known neurological diseases and epilepsy, which affects gains from cognitive remediation.
  • Unable to speak and understand English.
  • Hospitalized within the past one month.
  • Global Assessment of Functioning score of 30 or below, as participants who are too low functioning are unable to benefit from a strategy learning approach.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (5)

Anglican Care Center-Bukit Batok

Singapore, Singapore

RECRUITING

Anglican Care Center-Hougang

Singapore, Singapore

RECRUITING

Anglican Care Center-Pasir Ris

Singapore, Singapore

NOT YET RECRUITING

Anglican Care Center-Simei

Singapore, Singapore

RECRUITING

Anglican Care Center-Yishun

Singapore, Singapore

NOT YET RECRUITING

Related Publications (45)

  • Aas IH. Guidelines for rating Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF). Ann Gen Psychiatry. 2011 Jan 20;10:2. doi: 10.1186/1744-859X-10-2.

    PMID: 21251305BACKGROUND
  • Au-Yeung C, Bowie CR, Montreuil T, Baer LH, Lecomte T, Joober R, Abdel-Baki A, Jarvis GE, Margolese HC, De Benedictis L, Schmitz N, Thai H, Malla AK, Lepage M. Predictors of treatment attrition of cognitive health interventions in first episode psychosis. Early Interv Psychiatry. 2023 Oct;17(10):984-991. doi: 10.1111/eip.13391. Epub 2023 Jan 18.

    PMID: 36653167BACKGROUND
  • Ang MS, Rekhi G, Lee J. Validation of the Brief Negative Symptom Scale and its association with functioning. Schizophr Res. 2019 Jun;208:97-104. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2019.04.005. Epub 2019 Apr 13.

    PMID: 30987926BACKGROUND
  • Eng GK, Lam M, Bong YL, Subramaniam M, Bautista D, Rapisarda A, Kraus M, Lee J, Collinson SL, Chong SA, Keefe RS. Brief assessment of cognition in schizophrenia: normative data in an English-speaking ethnic Chinese sample. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2013 Dec;28(8):845-58. doi: 10.1093/arclin/act060. Epub 2013 Aug 1.

    PMID: 23912998BACKGROUND
  • Goldman HH, Skodol AE, Lave TR. Revising axis V for DSM-IV: a review of measures of social functioning. Am J Psychiatry. 1992 Sep;149(9):1148-56. doi: 10.1176/ajp.149.9.1148.

    PMID: 1386964BACKGROUND
  • Gur RC, Sara R, Hagendoorn M, Marom O, Hughett P, Macy L, Turner T, Bajcsy R, Posner A, Gur RE. A method for obtaining 3-dimensional facial expressions and its standardization for use in neurocognitive studies. J Neurosci Methods. 2002 Apr 15;115(2):137-43. doi: 10.1016/s0165-0270(02)00006-7.

    PMID: 11992665BACKGROUND
  • Hancock N, Scanlan JN, Honey A, Bundy AC, O'Shea K. Recovery Assessment Scale - Domains and Stages (RAS-DS): Its feasibility and outcome measurement capacity. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2015 Jul;49(7):624-33. doi: 10.1177/0004867414564084. Epub 2014 Dec 19.

    PMID: 25526940BACKGROUND
  • Harris AWF, Kightley M, Williams J, Ma C, Dodds C. Does Adding Social Cognitive Remediation Therapy to Neurocognitive Remediation Therapy Improve Outcomes in Young People With a Severe Mental Illness?-The Advantage Trial. Front Psychiatry. 2022 Mar 14;12:789628. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.789628. eCollection 2021.

    PMID: 35368729BACKGROUND
  • Hodge MA, Siciliano D, Withey P, Moss B, Moore G, Judd G, Shores EA, Harris A. A randomized controlled trial of cognitive remediation in schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull. 2010 Mar;36(2):419-27. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbn102. Epub 2008 Aug 20.

    PMID: 18718884BACKGROUND
  • Jiang J, Sim K, Lee J. Validated five-factor model of positive and negative syndrome scale for schizophrenia in Chinese population. Schizophr Res. 2013 Jan;143(1):38-43. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2012.10.019. Epub 2012 Nov 11.

    PMID: 23148897BACKGROUND
  • Kay SR, Fiszbein A, Opler LA. The positive and negative syndrome scale (PANSS) for schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull. 1987;13(2):261-76. doi: 10.1093/schbul/13.2.261.

    PMID: 3616518BACKGROUND
  • Keefe RS, Goldberg TE, Harvey PD, Gold JM, Poe MP, Coughenour L. The Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia: reliability, sensitivity, and comparison with a standard neurocognitive battery. Schizophr Res. 2004 Jun 1;68(2-3):283-97. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2003.09.011.

    PMID: 15099610BACKGROUND
  • Kirkpatrick B, Strauss GP, Nguyen L, Fischer BA, Daniel DG, Cienfuegos A, Marder SR. The brief negative symptom scale: psychometric properties. Schizophr Bull. 2011 Mar;37(2):300-5. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbq059. Epub 2010 Jun 17.

    PMID: 20558531BACKGROUND
  • Lam M, Collinson SL, Eng GK, Rapisarda A, Kraus M, Lee J, Chong SA, Keefe RS. Refining the latent structure of neuropsychological performance in schizophrenia. Psychol Med. 2014 Dec;44(16):3557-70. doi: 10.1017/S0033291714001020. Epub 2014 May 22.

    PMID: 25066336BACKGROUND
  • Lam M, Eng GK, Rapisarda A, Subramaniam M, Kraus M, Keefe RSE, Collinson SL. Formulation of the age-education index: measuring age and education effects in neuropsychological performance. Psychol Assess. 2013 Mar;25(1):61-70. doi: 10.1037/a0030548. Epub 2012 Nov 12.

    PMID: 23148648BACKGROUND
  • Lynch DA, Brown M, Saperstein A, Stefancic A, Medalia A. Assessing metamotivation in schizophrenia: A pilot study of the Brief Regulation of Motivation Scale (BRoMS). Psychiatry Res. 2022 Nov;317:114799. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2022.114799. Epub 2022 Aug 19.

    PMID: 36037743BACKGROUND
  • McDonald S, Bornhofen C, Shum D, Long E, Saunders C, Neulinger K. Reliability and validity of The Awareness of Social Inference Test (TASIT): a clinical test of social perception. Disabil Rehabil. 2006 Dec 30;28(24):1529-42. doi: 10.1080/09638280600646185.

    PMID: 17178616BACKGROUND
  • Pinkham AE, Harvey PD, Penn DL. Social Cognition Psychometric Evaluation: Results of the Final Validation Study. Schizophr Bull. 2018 Jun 6;44(4):737-748. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbx117.

    PMID: 28981848BACKGROUND
  • Scanlan JN, Hancock N, Honey A. The Recovery Assessment Scale - Domains and Stages (RAS-DS): Sensitivity to change over time and convergent validity with level of unmet need. Psychiatry Res. 2018 Mar;261:560-564. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2018.01.042.

    PMID: 29407723BACKGROUND
  • Wykes T, Stringer D, Boadu J, Tinch-Taylor R, Csipke E, Cella M, Pickles A, McCrone P, Reeder C, Birchwood M, Fowler D, Greenwood K, Johnson S, Perez J, Ritunnano R, Thompson A, Upthegrove R, Wilson J, Kenny A, Isok I, Joyce EM. Cognitive Remediation Works But How Should We Provide It? An Adaptive Randomized Controlled Trial of Delivery Methods Using a Patient Nominated Recovery Outcome in First-Episode Participants. Schizophr Bull. 2023 May 3;49(3):614-625. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbac214.

    PMID: 36869733BACKGROUND
  • Kim, Y.E., Brady, A.C., Wolters, C.A., 2018. Development and validation of the Brief Regulation of Motivation Scale. Learn. Individ. Differ. 67, 259-265. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.lindif.2017.12.010

    BACKGROUND
  • Kiresuk, T. J., Smith, A., & Cardillo, J. E. (2014). Goal attainment scaling: Applications, theory, and measurement. Psychology Press.

    BACKGROUND
  • McDonald, S. (2012) New Frontiers in Neuropsychological Assessment: Assessing Social Perception Using a Standardised Instrument, The Awareness of Social Inference Test. Australian Psychologist 47 (2012) 39-48.

    BACKGROUND
  • Chong NIM, Maniam Y, Chua YC, Tang C. The Implementation and Review of Cognitive Remediation Training for First Episode Psychosis in Singapore. Front Psychiatry. 2021 Nov 30;12:784935. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.784935. eCollection 2021.

    PMID: 34916979BACKGROUND
  • De Mare A, Cantarella M, Galeoto G. Effectiveness of Integrated Neurocognitive Therapy on Cognitive Impairment and Functional Outcome for Schizophrenia Outpatients. Schizophr Res Treatment. 2018 Oct 21;2018:2360697. doi: 10.1155/2018/2360697. eCollection 2018.

    PMID: 30420918BACKGROUND
  • Green MF, Kern RS, Braff DL, Mintz J. Neurocognitive deficits and functional outcome in schizophrenia: are we measuring the "right stuff"? Schizophr Bull. 2000;26(1):119-36. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.schbul.a033430.

    PMID: 10755673BACKGROUND
  • Hajduk M, Penn DL, Harvey PD, Pinkham AE. Social cognition, neurocognition, symptomatology, functional competences and outcomes in people with schizophrenia - A network analysis perspective. J Psychiatr Res. 2021 Dec;144:8-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2021.09.041. Epub 2021 Sep 24.

    PMID: 34592511BACKGROUND
  • McGurk SR, Twamley EW, Sitzer DI, McHugo GJ, Mueser KT. A meta-analysis of cognitive remediation in schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry. 2007 Dec;164(12):1791-802. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2007.07060906.

    PMID: 18056233BACKGROUND
  • Medalia A, Dorn H, Watras-Gans S. Treating problem-solving deficits on an acute care psychiatric inpatient unit. Psychiatry Res. 2000 Dec 4;97(1):79-88. doi: 10.1016/s0165-1781(00)00214-6.

    PMID: 11104859BACKGROUND
  • Medalia A, Erlich MD, Soumet-Leman C, Saperstein AM. Translating cognitive behavioral interventions from bench to bedside: The feasibility and acceptability of cognitive remediation in research as compared to clinical settings. Schizophr Res. 2019 Jan;203:49-54. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2017.07.044. Epub 2017 Jul 30.

    PMID: 28768601BACKGROUND
  • Medalia, A., Revheim, N., & Herlands, T. (2009). Cognitive Remediation for Psychological Disorders: Therapist Guide. New York: Oxford University Press.

    BACKGROUND
  • Medalia A, Herlands T, Baginsky C. Rehab rounds: Cognitive remediation in the supportive housing setting. Psychiatr Serv. 2003 Sep;54(9):1219-20. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.54.9.1219. No abstract available.

    PMID: 12954935BACKGROUND
  • Mueller DR, Schmidt SJ, Roder V. One-year randomized controlled trial and follow-up of integrated neurocognitive therapy for schizophrenia outpatients. Schizophr Bull. 2015 May;41(3):604-16. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbu223. Epub 2015 Feb 22.

    PMID: 25713462BACKGROUND
  • Tan BL. Profile of cognitive problems in schizophrenia and implications for vocational functioning. Aust Occup Ther J. 2009 Aug;56(4):220-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1630.2008.00759.x.

    PMID: 20854522BACKGROUND
  • Tan BL, Lee SA, Lee J. Social cognitive interventions for people with schizophrenia: A systematic review. Asian J Psychiatr. 2018 Jun;35:115-131. doi: 10.1016/j.ajp.2016.06.013. Epub 2016 Sep 23.

    PMID: 27670776BACKGROUND
  • Toglia J (2018) The dynamic interactional model and the multicontext approach. In: Katz N and Toglia J (eds) Cognition, Occupation, and Participation Across the Lifespan. Bethesda, MD: AOTA Press, 355-385.

    BACKGROUND
  • Toglia J, Goverover Y, Johnston MV, Dain B. Application of the Multicontextual Approach in Promoting Learning and Transfer of Strategy Use in an Individual with TBI and Executive Dysfunction. OTJR (Thorofare N J). 2011 Winter;31(1):S53-60. doi: 10.3928/15394492-20101108-09.

    PMID: 24650265BACKGROUND
  • Toglia J, Lee A, Steinberg C, Waldman-Levi A. (2020) Establishing and measuring treatment fidelity of a complex cognitive rehabilitation intervention: The multicontext approach. British Journal of Occupational Therapy. 83(6):363-374. doi:10.1177/0308022619898091

    BACKGROUND
  • Ventura J, Hellemann GS, Thames AD, Koellner V, Nuechterlein KH. Symptoms as mediators of the relationship between neurocognition and functional outcome in schizophrenia: a meta-analysis. Schizophr Res. 2009 Sep;113(2-3):189-99. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2009.03.035. Epub 2009 Jul 22.

    PMID: 19628375BACKGROUND
  • Wykes T, Huddy V, Cellard C, McGurk SR, Czobor P. A meta-analysis of cognitive remediation for schizophrenia: methodology and effect sizes. Am J Psychiatry. 2011 May;168(5):472-85. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2010.10060855. Epub 2011 Mar 15.

    PMID: 21406461BACKGROUND
  • Bryson G, Bell M, Lysaker P. Affect recognition in schizophrenia: a function of global impairment or a specific cognitive deficit. Psychiatry Res. 1997 Jul 4;71(2):105-13. doi: 10.1016/s0165-1781(97)00050-4.

    PMID: 9255855BACKGROUND
  • Law M, Baptiste S, McColl M, Opzoomer A, Polatajko H, Pollock N. The Canadian occupational performance measure: an outcome measure for occupational therapy. Can J Occup Ther. 1990 Apr;57(2):82-7. doi: 10.1177/000841749005700207.

    PMID: 10104738BACKGROUND
  • Toglia J. Weekly calendar planning activity: a performance test of executive function. AOTA Press; 2015.

    BACKGROUND
  • Kaizerman-Dinerman A, Roe D, Demeter N, Josman N. Do symptoms moderate the association between participation and executive functions outcomes among people with schizophrenia? BMC Psychiatry. 2023 Jan 17;23(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s12888-022-04510-0.

    PMID: 36650458BACKGROUND
  • Tan BL, Tan N, Koh V, Poh L, Medalia A. Integrative Neuro-social cognitive Strategy Programme for Instilling REcovery (INSPIRE): a community-based cognitive remediation trial-study procotol. BMC Psychiatry. 2024 Sep 19;24(1):621. doi: 10.1186/s12888-024-06070-x.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

SchizophreniaPsychotic Disorders

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Schizophrenia Spectrum and Other Psychotic DisordersMental Disorders

Study Officials

  • Bhing-Leet Tan, PhD

    Bhing-Leet Tan

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
Upon randomization, the co-investigators will indicate the allocated group in a separate spreadsheet from the outcome measurements. The co-investigator who is collecting baseline, post-intervention and 8-week outcome measurements will be blinded to the treatment allocation of each participant.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: The intervention study model is a parallel randomized controlled trial. There will be two arms. The experimental arm is 'cognitive remediation' and the control arm is 'standard psychiatric rehabilitation'. Participants will be assigned to one of the treatment arms at the beginning of the trial and will continue in that arm throughout the length of the trial. Assignment to the group is done using a computer randomization generator. All eligible participants will be randomly assigned to one of the treatment arms (experimental or control arm) based on a 1:1 treatment allocation. Hence, those who are randomly allocated to the experimental arm will receive cognitive remediation throughout the trial, while those randomly allocated to the control arm will receive standard psychiatric rehabilitation throughout the trial. Both treatment arms will run in parallel.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor and Cluster Director

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 22, 2024

First Posted

February 29, 2024

Study Start

August 6, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2027

Last Updated

January 27, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-01

Locations