CT-derived Virtual Stenting Optimize Coronary Revascularization (CT-COMPASS)
CT-COMPASS
Computed Tomography Coronary Physiology-derived Virtual Stenting Guided Revascularization Strategy in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease
1 other identifier
interventional
280
1 country
1
Brief Summary
A considerable number of patients presented with anatomically successful PCI results still suffer from functionally unresolved ischemia, which might be the cause for over one-fourth of patients experiencing recurrent angina at 1 year or adverse events at 2 years. Currently, the post-PCI physiology measurement is one of the effective metrics to quantify residual ischemia, and a suboptimal post-PCI result is strongly associated with worse outcomes. However, PCI optimization based on post-PCI physiology is, to certain extent, a provisional rescue action for a suboptimal index procedure, which may not be fully correctable "after the fact" given selected stents, site of deployment and procedural technique. Computed tomography (CT) coronary physiology-derived virtual stenting (CT-VS) based on pre-PCI CCTA angiograms is an augmented reality (AR) approach that simulates the post-stenting physiology assuming that the specified segment of the treated vessel is successfully dilated by implanting virtual stents. Previous studies have demonstrated the feasibility of optimizing PCI with CT-VS, with high consistency between pre-PCI simulated physiology result by CT-VS and actual post-PCI physiology results. Therefore, the application of CT-VS would help physicians to develop the best strategies while planning the procedure. However, there is a lack of knowledge regarding the efficacy of this novel physiological index that is available pre-PCI in achieving final post-PCI optimal physiological result. The Trials of "Computed Tomography Coronary Physiology-derived Virtual Stenting Guided Revascularization Strategy in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease (CT-COMPASS)" was designed to assess the efficacy of a CT-VS vs. standard angiographic guidance in achieving post-PCI optimal physiological result (post-PCI FFR≥0.90).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Mar 2024
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 11, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 28, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 5, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 23, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 20, 2025
CompletedAugust 12, 2025
August 1, 2025
1.3 years
February 11, 2024
August 7, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The proportion of patients with a final post-PCI FFR result ≥0.90
The proportion of patients with a final post-PCI FFR result ≥0.90 will be compared between the randomised groups
1 days
Secondary Outcomes (10)
The proportion of patients with final post-PCI FFR ≤0.80
1 days
The rate of target vessel failure (TVF) and its component features at 6 months.
6 months
The rate of target vessel failure (TVF) and its component features at 1 year.
1 year
Change from baseline in self-reported Health-related quality of life evaluation at 6 months.
6 months
Change from baseline in self-reported Health-related quality of life evaluation at 1 year.
1 year
- +5 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Virtual stenting-guided incremental optimization strategy (VIOS)
EXPERIMENTALVirtual Stenting analysis is conducted based on pre-PCI CCTA angiograms by "Imaging-Heart Team" to determine simulated optimal treatment strategy according VIOS protocol. If the patient is assigned to the VIOS, the result of virtual stenting and recommended treatment strategy will be disclosed to the operator. The operator will then follow the recommended strategy to attempt to obtain the target optimal post-PCI FFR result. Blinded FFR must be obtained after PCI.
Standard angiographic strategy
SHAM COMPARATORVirtual Stenting analysis is conducted based on pre-PCI CCTA angiograms by "Imaging-Heart Team" to determine simulated optimal treatment strategy according VIOS protocol. If the patient is assigned to the standard angiographic strategy, the result of virtual stenting and recommended treatment strategy will be blinded to the operator. The operator will then perform PCI based on international guidelines, local protocols and practice. Blinded FFR must be obtained after PCI.
Interventions
PCI is performed according to strategy recommended by "Imaging-Heart Team" based on VIOS protocol.
PCI is performed based on international guidelines, local protocols and practice.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age ≥ 18 years.
- Able to understand the trial design and provide written informed consent.
- Patients with a coronary CTA performed within 30 days.
- The CCTA angiograms amenable to CT-FFR measurement.
- At least 1 lesion of 50%-90% diameter stenosis in a coronary artery with ≥2.0mm reference vessel diameter by visual assessment.
- And this target vessel is of physiological ischemia as assessed by CT-FFR.
- \. The interrogated vessel is indicated for intervention assessed by operator based on indications other than CT-FFR.
You may not qualify if:
- Cardiogenic shock or severe heart failure (NYHA ≥III or LVEF\<30%).
- Severely impaired renal function: creatinine \>150μmol/L or Cockcroft-Gault calculated GFR \<45 ml/kg/1.73 m2 (calculated with Cockcroft-Gault formula).
- Allergy to iodine-containing contrast agents which cannot be adequately premedicated.
- The CCTA angiograms deems not amenable to CT-FFR measurement.
- Patients with only 1 coronary artery lesion with DS \>90% with TIMI flow \<3.
- An interrogated vessel presented with a CTO lesion.
- All coronary arteries were not physiologically ischemic.
- Coronary lesions favor CABG treatment.
- The interrogated vessel with only 1 coronary artery lesion with DS \>90% with TIMI flow \<3.
- Coronary lesions favor CABG treatment.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100037, China
Related Publications (7)
Sonck J, Nagumo S, Norgaard BL, Otake H, Ko B, Zhang J, Mizukami T, Maeng M, Andreini D, Takahashi Y, Jensen JM, Ihdayhid A, Heggermont W, Barbato E, Mileva N, Munhoz D, Bartunek J, Updegrove A, Collinsworth A, Penicka M, Van Hoe L, Leipsic J, Koo BK, De Bruyne B, Collet C. Clinical Validation of a Virtual Planner for Coronary Interventions Based on Coronary CT Angiography. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2022 Jul;15(7):1242-1255. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2022.02.003. Epub 2022 Apr 13.
PMID: 35798401BACKGROUNDBiscaglia S, Verardi FM, Tebaldi M, Guiducci V, Caglioni S, Campana R, Scala A, Marrone A, Pompei G, Marchini F, Scancarello D, Pignatelli G, D'Amore SM, Colaiori I, Demola P, Di Serafino L, Tumscitz C, Penzo C, Erriquez A, Manfrini M, Campo G. QFR-Based Virtual PCI or Conventional Angiography to Guide PCI: The AQVA Trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2023 Apr 10;16(7):783-794. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2022.10.054. Epub 2023 Mar 8.
PMID: 36898939BACKGROUNDCollison D, Didagelos M, Aetesam-Ur-Rahman M, Copt S, McDade R, McCartney P, Ford TJ, McClure J, Lindsay M, Shaukat A, Rocchiccioli P, Brogan R, Watkins S, McEntegart M, Good R, Robertson K, O'Boyle P, Davie A, Khan A, Hood S, Eteiba H, Berry C, Oldroyd KG. Post-stenting fractional flow reserve vs coronary angiography for optimization of percutaneous coronary intervention (TARGET-FFR). Eur Heart J. 2021 Dec 1;42(45):4656-4668. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab449.
PMID: 34279606BACKGROUNDZhang R, Xu B, Dou K, Guan C, Zhao Y, Wang X, Zou T, Qiao Z, Xie L, Wang H, Yuan S, Song L, Tu S, Wang Y, Wijns W. Post-PCI outcomes predicted by pre-intervention simulation of residual quantitative flow ratio using augmented reality. Int J Cardiol. 2022 Apr 1;352:33-39. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2022.01.054. Epub 2022 Jan 31.
PMID: 35101540BACKGROUNDXu B, Tu S, Song L, Jin Z, Yu B, Fu G, Zhou Y, Wang J, Chen Y, Pu J, Chen L, Qu X, Yang J, Liu X, Guo L, Shen C, Zhang Y, Zhang Q, Pan H, Fu X, Liu J, Zhao Y, Escaned J, Wang Y, Fearon WF, Dou K, Kirtane AJ, Wu Y, Serruys PW, Yang W, Wijns W, Guan C, Leon MB, Qiao S, Stone GW; FAVOR III China study group. Angiographic quantitative flow ratio-guided coronary intervention (FAVOR III China): a multicentre, randomised, sham-controlled trial. Lancet. 2021 Dec 11;398(10317):2149-2159. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02248-0. Epub 2021 Nov 4.
PMID: 34742368BACKGROUNDDing D, Huang J, Westra J, Cohen DJ, Chen Y, Andersen BK, Holm NR, Xu B, Tu S, Wijns W. Immediate post-procedural functional assessment of percutaneous coronary intervention: current evidence and future directions. Eur Heart J. 2021 Jul 15;42(27):2695-2707. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab186.
PMID: 33822922BACKGROUNDNeumann FJ, Sousa-Uva M, Ahlsson A, Alfonso F, Banning AP, Benedetto U, Byrne RA, Collet JP, Falk V, Head SJ, Juni P, Kastrati A, Koller A, Kristensen SD, Niebauer J, Richter DJ, Seferovic PM, Sibbing D, Stefanini GG, Windecker S, Yadav R, Zembala MO; ESC Scientific Document Group. 2018 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Eur Heart J. 2019 Jan 7;40(2):87-165. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy394. No abstract available.
PMID: 30165437BACKGROUND
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Kefei Dou, MD, PhD
Fuwai Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Kefei Dou, MD, Professor, China National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 11, 2024
First Posted
February 28, 2024
Study Start
March 5, 2024
Primary Completion
June 23, 2025
Study Completion
July 20, 2025
Last Updated
August 12, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-08